Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstennctapp

8,955 results

0.86s

  • DERRY M. THOMPSON v. TIMOTHY A. GRAHAM

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 5, 2025

    Landers, 872 S.W.2d at 675 (citing Brown v. Brown, 296 S.W. 356 (Tenn. 1927)). This Court must possess subject matter jurisdiction in order to adjudicate a claim, and subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived. Id. … In re Estate of Trigg, 368 S.W.3d 483, 489 (Tenn. 2012) (citing Redwing v. Catholic Bishop for the Diocese of Memphis, 363 S.W.3d 436, 445 (Tenn. 2012); Brown v. Brown, 281 S.W.2d 492, 497 (Tenn. 1955)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Barnes v. Scott

    35 Tenn. App. 135 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 8, 1950

    W. 739 ; Casey-Hedges Co. v. Browning, 2 Tenn. Civ. App. 358. In the former the trial Court’s attention was timely called to the error. In the latter, it does not appear whether attention was timely called. … Under the definition of remote contributory negligence adopted in this state in numerous cases, such as Elmore v. Thompson, 14 Tenn. App. 78, 100 ; Phillips-Buttorff Mfg. Co. v. McAlexander, 15 Tenn.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ranson v. Carlisle

    8 Tenn. App. 448 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 3, 1928

    Code, sections 4571, 4575 and 4579; Bandy v. Walker, 3 Head, 568 , 569; Foster v. Burem, 1 Heisk., 783 ; Brown v. Rocco & Co., 9 Heisk., 187 . See also. … Brown v. Rocco & Co., 9 Heisk., 187 , 188.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Knoxville's Community Development Corp. v. Woodfam Investments, L. P.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 24, 2000

    Davidson v. Greer, 35 Tenn. 384 (Tenn. 1855). Kyle v. Kyle, 74 S.W.2d 1065 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1934). However, written contracts and instruments may be reformed upon a showing of a mutual mistake or fraud. Pierce v. … McDonald v. Scott County, 87 S.W.2d 1019, 1021 (Tenn. 1935).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • James C. Breer v. Quenton White

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 23, 2005

    In Willis v. … The petition does not empower the courts to inquire into the intrinsic correctness of the board's decision. Arnold v. Tenn. Bd. of Paroles, 956 S.W.2d 478, 480 (Tenn.1997); Robinson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dickson v. State, Department of Environment & Conservation, Division of Underground Storage Tanks

    116 S.W.3d 738 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 9, 2003

    City of Chattanooga v. Davis, 54 S.W.3d 248 (Tenn.2001). … The Court said in City of Chattanooga v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • TECO Barge Line, Inc., n/k/a U.S. United Barge Line, LLC v. Justin P. Wilson, Tennessee Comptroller of the Treasury

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 9, 2010

    board to hear constitutional claims was before our Supreme Court in Colonial Pipeline Co. v. … Ott v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lawrence County v. George Shaffer, et ux

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 12, 2009

    Brown had no personal knowledge as to exactly when Jarel Lane became a County Road. … Collins v. Smithson, 585 S.W.2d 598, 603 (Tenn. 1979); Hodge v. Cornelison, 159 S.W.3d 32, 39 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rebecca Coleman, DVM v. The Humane Society of Memphis and Shelby County, A Tennessee not for profit organization and Ginger Morgan

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 14, 2014

    On December 2, one of the board members sent an email to the board and to Ms. … V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chiozza v. Chiozza

    315 S.W.3d 482 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 20, 2009

    Chiozza’s brief lists only one case (cited as “Lee Brown vs. Kelly Sue Brown (Tenn. 2006)”); however, from our review, this case is not actually cited in the brief. This is a violation of Tenn. R. App. P.27(a)(2). Tenn. … Whalum v. Marshall, 224 S.W.3d 169, 180-81 (Tenn. Ct. App.2006) (citing Banks v. St. Francis Hosp., 697 S.W.2d 340, 343 (Tenn.1985)).

    Cited 247 timesPublished
  • K.G.R., by and through his parents, Rachel Riffe and Jeffrey v. Union City School District

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 14, 2016

    Rye 477 S.W.3d at 250 (citing Estate of Brown, 402 -3- S.W.3d 193, 198 (Tenn. 2013); Hughes v. New Life Dev. Corp., 387 S.W.3d 453, 471 (Tenn. 2012)). … Mason v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cty., 189 S.W.3d 217, 222-223 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005) (citing Kindred v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools, 946 S.W.2d 47 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996); Chudasama v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Arthur McRae v. Knox County

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 7, 2004

    Case v. Shelby County Civil Service Merit Bd., 98 S.W.3d 167, 172 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). If any possible reason exists justifying the board or tribunal’s decision, such decision must be upheld. McCallen v. … In Town of East Ridge v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stephny Denise Young v. Richard Jordan, MD

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 20, 2016

    See, e.g., Rye v. … P. 56.04; Mathews Partners, L.L.C. v. Lemme, No. M2008- 01036-COA-R3-CV, 2009 WL 3172134, at *3 (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2009) (citing Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn.1997)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. St. Louis Mutual Life Insurance

    2 Tenn. Ch. R. 727 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 15, 1877

    Salvin v. James, 6 East, 571; Wood v. Dwarris, 11 Exch. Rep. 493; Rose v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co., 24 N. Y. 653 . … In the summer of 1873 a new board of directors seems-to have been elected by the policy-holders of the St.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Becky Elliott v. James G. Neeley

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 22, 2005

    Armstrong v. Neel, 725 S.W.2d 953, 955 n.1 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986). … Clay County Manor, Inc. v. State, 849 S.W.2d 755, 759 (Tenn. 1993) (quoting S. Ry. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 682 S.W.2d 196, 199 (Tenn. 1984)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • James Ray Bartlett v. Gail Corder

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 17, 2004

    He asked that the defendants be impeached and/or disbarred and reported to the Board of Professional Responsibility for disciplinary action. Mr. … Brown v. Birman Managed Care, Inc., 42 S.W.3d 62, 67 (Tenn. 2001).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Linda Epps v. Civil Service Commission of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, and the Metropolitan Action Commission

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 30, 2011

    Code Ann. § 27- 8-101; see also Demonbreun v. Metropolitan Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 206 S.W.3d 42, 46 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005); McCallen v. City of Memphis, 786 S.W.2d 633, 639 (Tenn. 1990). … Cooper v. Williamson County Bd. of Educ., 746 S.W.2d 176, 179 (Tenn. 1987). Our review of the evidence on appeal can be no broader or more comprehensive than the trial court’s review. Watts v. Civil Serv.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re: Estate of Murrey Louis Wakefield, AMSouth Bank and Judith Wakefield Sandlin, Co-Executors, Linda Wakefield Melvin and Judith Sandlin Melvin and Judith Sandlin v. Estate of Nancy Wakefield Coleman

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 22, 2004

    Brown and Gary C. Shockley, Nashville, for the appellant Estate of Nancy Wakefield Coleman, Ted R. Browning, Executor. Charles Trost, Joseph A. Woodruff, Stephanie J. … Browning, who was named as executor of her estate.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kenard P. Wallace v. Commissioner of Labor & Workforce Development

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 7, 2012

    Wallace then appealed the Appeals Tribunal decision to the Board of Review. On July 13, 2010, the Board affirmed the Appeals Tribunal decision. A rehearing was denied on August 5, 2010. … Armstrong v. Neel, 725 S.W.2d 953, 956 (Tenn. Ct. App.1986) (citing Boynton Cab Co. v. Neubeck, 296 N.W. 636, 640 (Wis.1941)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rebecca Stafford Shell v. Jon E. Shell

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 9, 2008

    Anderson v. … The Tennessee Supreme Court in Brown v. Brown, 155 Tenn. 530 (Tenn. 1927) recognized these principles.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.