Case law

Randolyn Laferney v. Kim Livesay

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 25, 2022

We also call for regular inspections of all facilities that board to train, or day care facilities. … (citing Redwing v. Catholic Bishop for the Diocese of Memphis, 363 S.W.3d 436, 445 (Tenn. 2012); Brown v. Brown, 281 S.W.2d 492, 497 (1955)).

Paris v. The City of Lebanon Personnel Review Bd.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 12, 1993

The Petition for Certiorari, filed more that sixty (60) days after the January 6, 1994 agreed settlement before the Board of Review, would be filed too late, Wilson v. Town of Greenville 509 S.W.2d 495. … Huddleston v.

Owens v. Church

675 S.W.2d 178 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 15, 1984

App. filed June 30, 1983, in Nashville), and Brown v. Fuqua, 9 Tenn.App. 22 (1928), which we believe are distinguishable from the instant matter. … Therefore, it cannot be said that Brown v. Fuqua or Austin preclude the granting of the relief afforded by the chancellor in this case. In Austin the court quoted with approval from Brown v.

City of Morristown v. Rebecca A. Long

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 31, 2005

Cappello v. Albert, C/A No. M2000-02104-COA-R3-CV, 2001 WL 1141220, 2001 Tenn. App. LEXIS 721 at *18 (Tenn. Ct. App. M.S., filed September 27, 2001). … Co. v. Board of Equalization, 682 S.W.2d 196,199 (Tenn. 1984). We also note the Board of Review’s acknowledgment of the possibility that Ms. Long’s “office co-worker”, apparently Ms.

Diane Worley v. White Tire of Tennessee, Inc. and Gazazbo, L.L.C.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 22, 2005

As said in Brown v. Brown, 45 Tenn. App. 78, 94, 320 S.W.2d 721, the rule announced in many of our early Tennessee cases has been consistently followed. One of these cases is Littlejohn v. … Id., see also GRW Enterprises , Inc., v. Davis, 797 S.W.2d 606 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1990); Brown v. Brown, 320 S.W.2d 721 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1958). This issue is also without merit.

Carey Faulkner v. City of Bartlett

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 29, 2009

Lee v. City of LaVergne, No. M2001-02098-COA-R3-CV, 2003 WL 1610831, at *2 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 28, 2003); King v. TFE, Inc., 15 S.W.3d 457, 460 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999); Thompson v. … Kerr v. Cross, Nos. 40 and 41, 1986 WL 6611, at *1 (Tenn. Ct. App. E.S. June 13, 1986) (citing State v. City of Memphis, 452 S.W.2d 346 (Tenn. 1970)); see also Watson v. City of LaVergne, No.

Flightless-N-Bird Farm v. Dughman

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 21, 1999

Board and Care. FNBF shall provide care, maintenance and board for the Breeding Paris [sic]. … See Stovall v. Battel, 619 S.W.2d 125 (Tenn. App. 1981).

Lawuan Stanford v. The Commissioner of the Department of Labor and Workforce Development and Altama Footwear

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 2, 2005

As a result of this decision, Stanford filed an appeal to the Department’s Board of Review (“Board”) on June 30, 2003. … Armstrong v. Neel, 725 S.W.2d 953, 955 n.2 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986) (citing S. Ry. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 682 S.W.2d 196, 199 (Tenn. 1984); Pace v.

Betty Bryant v. Roy Bryant

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 23, 2003

Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 168 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). Such a division is to be achieved upon consideration of the statutory factors found in Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-121(c) (Supp. 2002). … Smith v. Smith, 984 S.W.2d 606, 610 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997) (citing Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994)).

Randy Hensley v. Dept of Correction

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 30, 2002

Winchester v. Little, 996 S.W.2d 818, 824 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). Mr. Hensley alleges that the prison disciplinary board failed to accord him due process of law. … This argument is nothing more than a challenge to the intrinsic correctness of the board’s decision which is not the sort of relief a common-law writ of certiorari can provide. Arnold v.

The Honorable Frank v. Williams, Iii

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 16, 1996

Ford v. Traughber, 813 S.W.2d 141, 144 (Tenn. App. 1991). In Sabastian v. Bible, 649 S.W.2d 593, 594-5 (Tenn. … There is substantial and material evidence that supports the Board’s findings on this issue. In addition, there must be a causal connection between the employment and the illness or disability. Cawthron v.

150 4th Ave. N. Tenant, LLC D/B/A WeWork v. The Metropolitan Nashville Board of Zoning Appeals - Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 17, 2020

THE METROPOLITAN NASHVILLE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ET AL. … Whittemore v. City of Brentwood Planning Comm’n, 835 S.W.2d 11, 16 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992) (citing Sokol v. City of Lake Oswego, 786 P.2d 1324, 1325 (Or. Ct. App. 1990)).

Lowe v. Irvin

52 Tenn. App. 356 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 19, 1963

In Adams v. Brown, 37 Tenn. App. 258, 263 , 262 S. W. (2d) 79, 81 , the Court quoting from 38 Am. Jur. … Brown was that the Court should have directed a verdict, and our Supreme Court following the rule set forth in the above quotation and making reference to Holt v. Walsh, 180 Tenn. 307 , 174 S.

Sherman Matthews v. UPS Store Center 3138

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 25, 2021

See Biscan v. Brown, 160 S.W.3d 462, 468 (Tenn. 2005). Mr. Matthews testified that his stereo receiver was “extremely damaged” during shipment. … Prewitt v. Brown, 525 S.W.3d 616, 623 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). Or damages can sometimes be measured by the “difference in the fair market value of the property immediately before [and after] the incident.” Id.

Louisville and Nashville R.R. Co. v. Dillehay

3 Tenn. App. 476 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 7, 1926

In Person v. … In Wilcox v.

Mary Kruger v. The State of Tennessee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 28, 2013

Hannan v. … V.

Forrest City Grocery Company v. Tennessee Department of Revenue

917 S.W.2d 247 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 19, 1995

Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 63 S.Ct. 307, 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943). … Finding that the California Act allowed wine prices to be fixed by private persons and not the state, the Supreme Court held that the state action immunity recognized in Parker v. Brown did not apply.

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Clark's Creek Drainage Dist. 6

4 Tenn. App. 380 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 12, 1926

City of Bristol v. Boswick, 139 Tenn., 304 ; City of Bristol v. Boswick, 146 Tenn., 205 ; Cass v. Smith, 146 Tenn., 218 ; Kimball v. Parks, 151 Tenn., 103 . … City of Bristol v. Bostwick, 139 Tenn., 304 ; City of Bristol v. Bostwick, 146 Tenn., 205 ; Cass v. Smith, 146 Tenn., 218 ; Kimball v. Parks, 151 Tenn., 103 .

Richard A. Berent v. CMH Homes, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 28, 2014

Brown v. Tenn. Title Loans, Inc., 216 S.W.3d 780, 783 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). … Thus, as we held in Brown and McGregor, the Supreme Court’s decision in Taylor is controlling here.

Charles Conner v. Commissioner Michael Magill, Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 18, 2004

As an initial matter, we must review the Board’s findings of fact to determine whether they are supported by substantial and material evidence. Gluck v. Civil Serv. Comm’n, 15 S.W.3d 486, 489-90 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). … We must now examine the Board’s conclusions of law to determine whether they are supported by the record and have a reasonable basis in the law. Sabastian v. Bible, 649 S.W.2d 593, 594-95 (Tenn. Ct.