Case law

Fiser v. City of Knoxville

584 S.W.2d 659 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 16, 1979

But boards of this nature are not legislative bodies, as explained in Reddoch v. Smith, 214 Tenn. 213 , 379 S.W.2d 641 (1964). … Zoning Board of Review of Cranston, 85 R.I. 152 , 128 A.2d 342 (1957); City of Naperville v.

Jack E. Miller v. Boyd Wyatt

457 S.W.3d 405 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 26, 2014

the conduct of the affairs of such board, commission, agency, authority, or other governing body.” … The United States Supreme Court, in Bogan v.

Bravo Ex Rel. Gamboa v. Sumner Regional Health Systems, Inc.

148 S.W.3d 357 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 5, 2004

As part of his service on the Tenn-Care Board, Dr. … Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d 208, 211 (Tenn.1993).

Louisville and Nashville R.R. Co. v. Dillehay

3 Tenn. App. 476 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 7, 1926

In Person v. … In Wilcox v.

Smith v. Redwine

26 Tenn. App. 104 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 27, 1942

The following regulation was adopted by the Board, and by such adoption became the law with reference thereto: “d. … Bay City Bank v. White, 283 Mich. 267 , 277 N. W. 888 ; Ridge Investment Corp. v. Nicolosi, 193 A. 710 , 15 N. J. Misc. 569.

Mary Kruger v. The State of Tennessee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 28, 2013

Hannan v. … V.

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Clark's Creek Drainage Dist. 6

4 Tenn. App. 380 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 12, 1926

City of Bristol v. Boswick, 139 Tenn., 304 ; City of Bristol v. Boswick, 146 Tenn., 205 ; Cass v. Smith, 146 Tenn., 218 ; Kimball v. Parks, 151 Tenn., 103 . … City of Bristol v. Bostwick, 139 Tenn., 304 ; City of Bristol v. Bostwick, 146 Tenn., 205 ; Cass v. Smith, 146 Tenn., 218 ; Kimball v. Parks, 151 Tenn., 103 .

Christian Home for the Aged, Inc. v. Tennessee Assessment Appeals Commission

790 S.W.2d 288 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 9, 1990

City of Nashville v. State Board of Equalization, 210 Tenn. 587 , 360 S.W.2d 458 (1962). … Ass’n v. State Board of Equalization, 760 S.W.2d 954, 956 (Tenn. App.1988).

City of Morristown v. Rebecca A. Long

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 31, 2005

Cappello v. Albert, C/A No. M2000-02104-COA-R3-CV, 2001 WL 1141220, 2001 Tenn. App. LEXIS 721 at *18 (Tenn. Ct. App. M.S., filed September 27, 2001). … Co. v. Board of Equalization, 682 S.W.2d 196,199 (Tenn. 1984). We also note the Board of Review’s acknowledgment of the possibility that Ms. Long’s “office co-worker”, apparently Ms.

Owens v. Church

675 S.W.2d 178 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 15, 1984

App. filed June 30, 1983, in Nashville), and Brown v. Fuqua, 9 Tenn.App. 22 (1928), which we believe are distinguishable from the instant matter. … Therefore, it cannot be said that Brown v. Fuqua or Austin preclude the granting of the relief afforded by the chancellor in this case. In Austin the court quoted with approval from Brown v.

Flightless-N-Bird Farm v. Dughman

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 21, 1999

Board and Care. FNBF shall provide care, maintenance and board for the Breeding Paris [sic]. … See Stovall v. Battel, 619 S.W.2d 125 (Tenn. App. 1981).

Diane Worley v. White Tire of Tennessee, Inc. and Gazazbo, L.L.C.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 22, 2005

As said in Brown v. Brown, 45 Tenn. App. 78, 94, 320 S.W.2d 721, the rule announced in many of our early Tennessee cases has been consistently followed. One of these cases is Littlejohn v. … Id., see also GRW Enterprises , Inc., v. Davis, 797 S.W.2d 606 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1990); Brown v. Brown, 320 S.W.2d 721 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1958). This issue is also without merit.

Raleigh Court Condominiums, Homeowners' Association, Inc. v. E. Doyle Johnson Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 29, 2013

The President shall preside at all meetings of the Association and the Board. … Brown v. Tennessee Title Loans, Inc., 328 S.W.3d 850, 855 (Tenn. 2010).

McRedmond v. Estate of Andrew Marianelli

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 16, 2000

Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d 208 (Tenn. 1993). … Johns v. Caldwell, 601 S.W.2d 37 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1980); Acree v. E.I.F.C., Inc., 502 S.W.2d 43 (Ky. 1973). Controlling shareholders likewise owe a fiduciary duty to minority shareholders. Nelms v.

Lowe v. Irvin

52 Tenn. App. 356 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 19, 1963

In Adams v. Brown, 37 Tenn. App. 258, 263 , 262 S. W. (2d) 79, 81 , the Court quoting from 38 Am. Jur. … Brown was that the Court should have directed a verdict, and our Supreme Court following the rule set forth in the above quotation and making reference to Holt v. Walsh, 180 Tenn. 307 , 174 S.

Dan Johnson v. Department of Correction

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 31, 2002

State v. Johnson, No. 61, 1989 W L 8657 3 (Tenn. Crim. App. Aug. 2, 198 9), perm. app. denied (Tenn. Dec. 4, 198 9).  As a result of the robbery conviction, the Tennessee Board of Paroles revoked Mr. … Bradley v. State ex rel. Haggard, 222 Tenn. 535, 540, 438 S.W.2d 738, 740 (1969); Lamb v. State, 207 Tenn. at 163, 338 S.W.2d at 586; Tusant v.

Allen Riggs v. Richard B. Wright

510 S.W.3d 421 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 7, 2016

Brown, 160 S.W.3d 462, 478–79 (Tenn. 2005) (quoting Turner v. Jordan, 957 S.W.2d 815, 818 (Tenn. 1997)). … Brown, 160 S.W.3d 462, 479 (Tenn. 2005)).

Roland Digital Media, Inc. v. City of Livingston

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 7, 2019

Thus, Roland’s petition is distinguishable from other cases in which petitioners have named individual members of a particular board or commission instead of the board or commission itself. See Tankesly v. Pugh, No. … App. 2001) (where petitioner named prison guards and members of the prison disciplinary board as defendants but not the prison disciplinary board itself); Seals v.

Lawuan Stanford v. The Commissioner of the Department of Labor and Workforce Development and Altama Footwear

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 2, 2005

As a result of this decision, Stanford filed an appeal to the Department’s Board of Review (“Board”) on June 30, 2003. … Armstrong v. Neel, 725 S.W.2d 953, 955 n.2 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986) (citing S. Ry. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 682 S.W.2d 196, 199 (Tenn. 1984); Pace v.

Betty Bryant v. Roy Bryant

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 23, 2003

Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 168 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). Such a division is to be achieved upon consideration of the statutory factors found in Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-121(c) (Supp. 2002). … Smith v. Smith, 984 S.W.2d 606, 610 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997) (citing Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994)).