Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstennctapp

8,955 results

1.27s

  • In re Estate of John J. Burnette

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 16, 2016

    Similarly, in Brown v. Daly, 884 S.W.2d 121, 124 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994), we held that a local rule regarding a demand for a jury trial conflicted with Tenn. R. Civ. P. 38.02. … Brown, 884 S.W.2d at 123-24; accord First Citizens Bank of Cleveland v. Cross, No. 03A01-9806-CH-00203, 1999 WL 76079, at *3 (Tenn. Ct. App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Papachristou v. University of Tennessee

    29 S.W.3d 487 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 29, 2000

    Clay County Manor, Inc. v. State of Tennessee, 849 S.W.2d 755, 759 (Tenn. -5- 1993) (quoting Southern Railway Co. v. … Bryant v. Tennessee State Board of Accountancy, No. 01A01-9303-CH-00088, Davidson County (Tenn. Ct. App. filed September 1, 1993 at Nashville) (citing Metropolitan Gov’t. of Nashville v.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Tetra Tech, Inc. v. Performa Entertainment Real Estate,Inc.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 3, 2008

    Tetra Tech’s July 20 fax also included a budget estimate for enclosures at three locations and a cover letter from its senior project manager, Adam Brown (Mr. Brown). Mr. … Welch v. Thuan, 882 S.W.2d 792, 793 (Tenn. App. 1994); Merriman v. Smith, 599 S.W.2d 548, 559 (Tenn. App. 1979).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Union & Planters Bank & Trust Co. v. Evans

    8 Tenn. App. 63 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 22, 1928

    It is the insistence of the defendant that where usury appears upon the face of the note sued on, usury need not be pleaded' (citing Richardson v. Brown, 68 Tenn., 242 ; Bang v. Windmill Co., 96 Tenn., 365 ). … But this holding- has been expressly disapproved in Richardson v. Brown, 9 Baxter, 242 -249, as not in harmony with our laws defining usury.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Indiana State District Council of Laborers and HOD Carriers Pension Fund v. Gary Brukardt

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 19, 2009

    In Anthony v. … The lexicon seems to be referenced as “Revlon duties” from the discussion of board obligations in seeking or considering a merger in Revlon v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Clark Earls v. Shirley Earls

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 31, 2000

    Brown v. Brown, No. 02A01-9108-CV-00168, 1992 WL 5243, at *3 (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 16, 1992) (No Tenn. R. App. P. 11 application filed). The trial court in this case brushed Brown v. … See Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 169 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994); Ingram v. Ingram, 721 S.W.2d 262, 264 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986). Tenn.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Schering Healthcare v. St. Bd. Equalization

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 23, 1998

    In Austin v. … Goss, at 824, 825; Tyrolf v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hall v. TN Bd. of Paroles

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 15, 1999

    Ellison v. Alley, 902 S.W.2d 415 (Tenn. App. 1995). … Therefore, Appellant had no right to appointment of counsel in Parole Board matters. Flowers v. Traughber, Tenn. App. No. 01A01-9609-CH-00392, filed March 27, 1997, perm. app. denied July 14, 1997.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Willis v. Franklin Co. Bd. of Education

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 15, 1998

    The term is not ambiguous, see Anderson v. … This section does not prevent the superintendent or the school board from determining a laid off teacher’s competency, compatibility, and suitability for a particular position. See Randall v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Union Planters Corp. v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.

    733 S.W.2d 509 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 26, 1987

    See Belsky v. Payne, 560 S.W.2d 78, 81 (Tenn.App.1977); Read v. Thomas, 679 S.W.2d 467, 469 (Tenn.App.1984); and Keystone Insurance Company v. Griffith, 659 S.W.2d 364, 366 (Tenn.App.1983). … In Cohen v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. McReynolds

    886 S.W.2d 233 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 27, 1994

    We do not think L & N Railroad v. Bate supports Stewart Title’s argument. That case upheld the power of the courts to review the action of the board of railroad assessors by the common law writ of certiorari. … See Brown v. Tennessee Real Estate Comm., 494 S.W.2d 506 (Tenn.App.1972). The court did not say that the petitioner had the right to a trial of the assessments in the courts.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Carolyn Phelps v. Michael McGill, Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 9, 2002

    Phelps then appealed to the TDOL Board of Review (hereinafter “Board”) and the Board, by letter dated August 1, 2000, affirmed the decision of the Tribunal. … Weaver v. Wallace, 565 S.W.2d 867, 870 (Tenn. 1978)(citing Detterer v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 168 Pa. Super. 291, 77 A.2d 886 (1951); Boynton Cab Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Xiaohua Jiang v. Kevin Furness d/b/a Premium Auto Repair

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 19, 2024

    Brown v. Crown Equip. Corp., 181 S.W.3d 268, 281 (Tenn. 2005) (citing Gaston v. Tenn. Farmers Mut. Ins. Co., 120 S.W.3d 815, 819 (Tenn. 2003)). … Goree, 490 S.W.3d at 430 (citing Brown v. Christian Bros. Univ., 428 S.W.3d 38, 50 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carey Faulkner v. City of Bartlett

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 29, 2009

    Lee v. City of LaVergne, No. M2001-02098-COA-R3-CV, 2003 WL 1610831, at *2 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 28, 2003); King v. TFE, Inc., 15 S.W.3d 457, 460 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999); Thompson v. … Kerr v. Cross, Nos. 40 and 41, 1986 WL 6611, at *1 (Tenn. Ct. App. E.S. June 13, 1986) (citing State v. City of Memphis, 452 S.W.2d 346 (Tenn. 1970)); see also Watson v. City of LaVergne, No.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Corp. v. Metro Gov't of Nashville

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 26, 2000

    The proper vehicle for reviewing decisions of local boards of zoning appeals is the common-law writ of certiorari. See McCallen v. City of Memphis, 786 S.W.2d 633, 639 (Tenn. 1990). … See Riggs v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thomas Joiner v. Dora Taylor Joiner

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 10, 2000

    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 10, 2000 THOMAS HORACE JOINER v. … Hill v. City of Germantown, 31 S.W.3d 234, 237 (Tenn. 2000). Wife contends that the language of Tenn.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • General Oils Company, Division of Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Claude Ramsey, Assessor of Property for Hamilton County, Tennessee and TN State Board of Equalization

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 12, 1996

    Presley v. Bennett, 860 S.W.2d 857, 859 (Tenn. 1993). … Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. King, 678 S.W.2d 19, 23 (Tenn. 1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1075 (1985); Tennessee Manufactured Hous. Ass’n v. Metro Gov't, 798 S.W.2d 254, 257 (Tenn. App. 1990).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Patey v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

    19 Tenn. App. 634 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 18, 1936

    Co. v. McCrary, 161 Tenn., 389, 392-394 , 32 S. W. (2d) 1052 . … See, also, Bowen v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 17 Tenn. App., 322, 337 , 67 S. W. (2d), 164 ; Blagg v. Missouri State Life Insurance Company, 15 Tenn. App., 242 . In the recent case of Miller v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kaileigh Marie Dunn v. Russell Allen Dunn, III

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 8, 2026

    See Cook v. State, 606 S.W.3d 247, 255 (Tenn. 2020). … See Camp v. Camp, 361 S.W.3d 539, 548 (Tenn. Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shaleen Fowler v. Morristown-Hamblen Hospital Association

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 24, 2019

    Acts, c. 474, § 27. 3 Appellants argue that the three factor analysis of Brown v. Tennessee Title Loans, Inc., 328 S.W.3d 850, 855 (Tenn. 2010) is applicable. … In Scott v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.