Case law

Money & Tax Help, Inc. v. Moody

180 S.W.3d 561 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 3, 2005

Brown. *563 On December 19,1994, Mr. Moody entered into an agreement with Mr. … Brown, on behalf of Tax Help, Inc. signed a nearly identical agreement on September 1,1998. On June 16, 1999, Mr. Brown sold the assets of Tax Help, Inc. to Henry J.

Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. v. Oliver

25 Tenn. App. 114 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 19, 1941

In Brown v. Brown, 86 Tenn., 277, 304 , 6 S. W., 869 , 7 S. … The Court said in Brown v. Brown, 86 Tenn., 277, 304 , 6 S. W., 869 , 7 S.

Julia Browning v. Mark D. Browning

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 27, 2018

08/27/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 1, 2018 JULIA BROWNING V. MARK D. … Browning a default judgment. However, trial court judges have “broad discretionary authority to control their dockets and the proceedings in their courts,” Hessmer v. Hessmer, 138 S.W.3d 901, 904 (Tenn. Ct.

Mallicoat v. Poynter

722 S.W.2d 681 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 9, 1986

In Petty v. … The rationale was expressed in the early case of Brown v.

Bells Banking Co. v. Jackson Centre, Inc.

938 S.W.2d 421 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 26, 1996

Co. v. Crush Int'l 726 S.W.2d 926, 931 (Tenn.App.1986). … Co. v.

Sparks v. Mena

294 S.W.3d 156 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 6, 2008

State v. Copeland, 226 S.W.3d 287, 301 (Tenn.2007); Brown v. Crown Equipment Corp., 181 S.W.3d 268, 273 (Tenn.2005). … Brown v. Crown Equipment Corp., 181 S.W.3d at 268, 274 (Tenn.2005).

Earls v. Earls

42 S.W.3d 877 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 20, 2000

Brown v. Brown, No. 02A01-9108-CV-00168, 1992 WL 5243 , at *3 (Tenn.Ct.App. Jan.16, 1992) (No Tenn.R.App.P. 11 application filed). *883 The trial court in this case brushed Brown v. … See Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 169 (Tenn.Ct.App.1994); Ingram v. Ingram, 721 S.W.2d 262, 264 (Tenn.Ct.App.1986).

Ronald E. Crook v. Angela R. Jock

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 13, 2005

App. 2004) (citing Harbour v. Brown for Ulrich, 732 S.W.2d 598, 599 (Tenn. 1987)). … See Harbour v. Brown for Ulrich, 732 S.W.2d 598, 600 (Tenn. 1987).

In Re Estate of Leath

294 S.W.3d 571 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 3, 2008

Sanders v. McClanahan, 59 Tenn.App. 590 , 442 S.W.2d 664, 667 (1969) (citing Haven v. Wrinkle, 29 Tenn.App. 195 , 195 S.W.2d 787, 793 (1946)). As noted by this Court in Shrum v. … Again, the appellants seek to rely upon Brown, ibid,., in support of their argument and again, we find a clear distinction between Brown and this case.

Janice Bunch v. Tiffany Jones

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 30, 2015

Carr, III and Glankler Brown, PLLC.  OPINION I. Background On March 18, 2009, Glankler Brown, PLLC (“Glankler”) and Oscar C. … In its notice of attorney‟s lien, Appellees argue, in relevant part, that: With regard to attorney fees incurred by Glankler Brown . . . Glankler Brown and Plaintiff Janice L.

Anderson v. Carter

512 S.W.2d 297 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 29, 1974

V. “The Chancellor erred in theorizing that the reason the Board took no action against the funeral director’s license of Joe F. Anderson was because the Board had reservations concerning the proof before it.” … State Board of Dental Examiners v. Savelle, 90 Colo. 177 , 8 P.2d 693, 697 . That which violates ethical code of profession or such conduct which is unbecoming member of profession in good standing. People v.

Sircy v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County

182 S.W.3d 815 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 3, 2005

In support of its argument, Metro relies primarily on the cases of City of Lebanon v. Baird, 756 S.W.2d 236 (Tenn.1988) and Brown v. City of Manchester, 722 S.W.2d 394 (Tenn.Ct.App.1986). … Metro also contends that the trial court misapplied the case of Brown v. City of Manchester. See Brown, 722 S.W.2d at 394 .

Brannon v. County of Shelby

900 S.W.2d 30 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 19, 1994

See Carter v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Nashville, 377 S.W.2d 914, 916 (Tenn.1964); Christopher v. Spooner, 640 S.W.2d 833, 835 (Tenn.App.1982). … Schmittou v. City of Nashville, 208 Tenn. 290 , 345 S.W.2d 874, 878 (1961); Johnson v. City of Jackson, 42 Tenn.App. 296 , 302 S.W.2d 355, 361 (1956).

Marshall v. Sevier County

639 S.W.2d 440 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 21, 1982

Jamieson v. Trevelyan, 10 Exch. 748, 28 Eng.Law & Eq. 535; Perkins v. Brown, 135 Tenn. 140 , 185 S.W. 1073 (1916). Also see Raskind v. Raskind, 45 TenmApp. 583, 325 S.W.2d 617 (1959). … The superintendent was successful and was in turn sued by the members of the school board seeking to declare the statute unconstitutional.

Dossett v. City of Kingsport

258 S.W.3d 139 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 28, 2007

Wood v. *144 Metro. … In Neese v.

421 Corp. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County

36 S.W.3d 469 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 26, 2000

The proper vehicle for reviewing decisions of local boards of zoning appeals is the common-law writ of certiorari. See McCallen v. City of Memphis, 786 S.W.2d 633, 639 (Tenn.1990). … See Hoover, Inc. v. Metropolitan Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 955 S.W.2d at 55 . II. The Board’s Interpretation of the Local Zoning Ordinance and Reliance on State Law Mr.

Tennessee Department of Health, Division of Health Related Boards and The Board of Medical Examiners v. W. Dwight Frisbee, M.D.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 9, 1998

See Dockery v. Board of Prof’l Responsibility, 937 S.W.2d 863, 866 (Tenn. 1996); Miller v. Alman Constr. Co., 666 S.W.2d 466, 468 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983). … One jurisdiction appears to apply the locality rule, see Franz v. Board of Med. Quality Assurance, 642 P.2d 792, 798 n.4 (Cal. 1982); while another jurisdiction has specifically declined to apply it. See Spray v.

Barret v. County of Shelby

619 S.W.2d 390 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 21, 1981

In Grant v. … Motlow v.

Gay v. City of Somerville

878 S.W.2d 124 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 26, 1994

Bagley & Co. v. Union-Buffalo Mills Co., 9 Tenn.App. 63, 68 (1928). The specific acts of the Board which lead us to this conclusion are discussed through this opinion. … Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 542 , 105 S.Ct. 1487, 1493 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985) (quoting Mullane v.

Steve Rogers v. State

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 18, 2003

See Caton v. Pic-Walsh Freight Co., 211 Tenn. 334, 338, 364 S.W.2d 931, 933 (1963); Brown v. Brown, 198 Tenn. at 618-19, 281 S.W.2d at 501. … Judgments or orders entered by courts without subject matter jurisdiction are void, see Brown v. Brown, 198 Tenn. at 610, 281 S.W.2d at 497; Riden v. Snider, 832 S.W.2d 341, 343 (Tenn.Ct.App.1991); Scales v.