Case law

Laminite Plastics Mfg. Co. v. Greene

561 S.W.2d 458 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1978

Weight of the boards ranged from fifteen to twenty-five pounds. … Central Motor Express Inc. v. Burney, 214 Tenn. 118 , 377 S.W.2d 947 (1964); Brown Shoe Co. v. Reed, 209 Tenn. 106 , 350 S.W.2d 65 (1961).

Douglas Ralph Beier v. Board of Professional Responsibility of The Supreme Court of Tennessee

Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 2, 2020

Citing Board of Professional Responsibility v. … In arguing for a two-year suspension, the Board compares Mr. Beier’s conduct to the violations in Board of Professional Responsibility v. Justice, 577 S.W.3d 908 (Tenn. 2019).

In Re Danny K. DOCKERY

970 S.W.2d 956 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1998

Dockery v. Board of Professional Responsibility, 937 S.W.2d 863 (Tenn. 1996). … Dockery filed a response denying the allegations, asking to reopen the investigation regarding his suspension, and requesting damages from the Board.

Paty v. McDaniel

547 S.W.2d 897 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1977

Braunfeld v. Brown, supra, 366 U.S., at 607 , 81 S.Ct., at 1148 . … As in West Virginia Board of Education v.

Reagan v. McBroom

164 Tenn. 476 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1932

Shields v. McMahan, 112 Tenn., 1 . The appeal is in the nature of a writ of error, and the finding of the trial judge is'conclusive on the facts, if sustained by any material evidence. Brown v. … Smith v. Hubbard, 85 Tenn., 306 ; Montague v. Thompson, 91 Tenn., *484 168, 176; Nance v. Smyth, 118 Tenn., 349 ; Southern Railway Co. v. Bickley, 119 Tenn., 528 ; Kittel v. Steger, 121 Tenn., 400 . In Smith v.

Melanie Lemon v. Williamson County Schools

Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 7, 2021

We review the trial court’s legal conclusions regarding the adequacy of the complaint de novo. 346 S.W.3d 422, 426 (Tenn. 2011) (citations omitted) (quoting Brown v. Tenn. … Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46 cmt. h; see Brown v. Mapco Exp., Inc., 393 S.W.3d 696, 704 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). The Court of Appeals detailed the factual allegations in Ms.

Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Board of Equalization for Assessment of Railroad Property

122 Tenn. 1 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1908

Porter v. Rockford Railroad Co. ( 76 Ill., 561 ), supra; Law v. People, 87 Ill., 385 ; State Railroad Tax Cases, 92 U. S., 575 , 23 L. Ed., 663 ; City of Dubuque v. C., D. & M. Railroad Co., 47 Iowa, 196 . … See, also, State, ex rel., v. Chicago, Rock Island, Railroad Co., 162 Mo., 391 , 63 S. W., 495 ; St. Louis, Iron Mountain, etc., Railroad Co. v. Miller Co., 67 Ark., 498, 55 S. W., 926 ; Burlington Railroad Co. v.

Robert Allen Doll, III v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee

Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 20, 2024

The trial court said it understood the holdings in Meehan v. Board of Professional Responsibility of Supreme Court of Tennessee, 584 S.W.3d 403 (Tenn. 2019) and Beier v. … Because this case was appealed under Section 33, the Board says this Court’s review is under the same standard of review as the trial court, citing Board of Professional Responsibility v.

Shugart v. Shugart

111 Tenn. 179 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1903

Law (2 Ed.), 1016-1020; McEwen v. Troost, 1 Sneed, 186 ; Trowell v. Carraway, 10 Heisk., 104 ; Marshall v. Russell, 93 Tenn., 261 , 25 S. W., 1070 . … Law (2 Ed.), 1029-1062; Brunson v. Brunson, 19 Tenn., *185 630 ; Donnell v. Donnell, 38 Tenn., 270 ; Brown v. Moore, 40 Tenn., 671 .

Sanford v. Waugh & Co., Inc.

328 S.W.3d 836 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 17, 2010

(c) A corporation having fifty (50) or fewer shareholders may dispense with or limit the authority of a board of directors by describing in its charter who will perform some or all of the duties of a board of … Biscan v. Brown, 160 S.W.3d 462, 468 (Tenn. 2005). The trial court’s ruling was based on the facts that (1) Mr. Sanford never pled interference with contract, and (2) Mr.

In Re Guy S. DAVIS

970 S.W.2d 458 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1998

Davis For Board of Professional Guy S. Davis, Pro Se Responsibility P. O. … Based on the foregoing events and Davis’s admission, the Board filed a petition asking that Davis be held in contempt for violating the temporary suspension order.

State ex rel. Town of Arlington v. Shelby County Election Commission

209 Tenn. 289 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1961

“In the very recent decision in Board of Education of Memphis et al. v. … In our recent case of Board of Education of Memphis et al. v.

Brian Philip Manookian v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee (Dissenting)

Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 16, 2024

Resp. v. Parrish, 556 S.W.3d 153 (Tenn. 2018); Bd. of Pro. Resp. of Sup. Ct. of Tenn. v. Sheppard, 556 S.W.3d 139 (Tenn. 2018); Napolitano v. Bd. of Pro. Resp., 535 S.W.3d 481 (Tenn. 2017); Reguli v. Bd. of Pro. … See Cotten v. Wilson, 576 S.W.3d 626, 654 (Tenn. 2019) (Lee, J., dissenting); Borne v.

State of Tennessee v. LaJuan Harbison

539 S.W.3d 149 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 9, 2018

State v. Dellinger, 79 S.W.3d 458, 468 (Tenn. 2002); State v. Brown, 795 S.W.2d 689, 693 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1990); see State v. Alcorn, 741 S.W.2d 135, 140 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987). … (quoting Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 (1977))).

Nashville Street Railway v. Griffin

49 L.R.A. 451 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1900

Tbe propositions criticized are, in substance, tbat if tbe plaintiff boarded tbe car after it left tbe transfer station, and if tbe conductor, when be boarded bis car between tbe transfer station and car shed, rang tbe motorman … Turner v. Railroad, 16 Pickle, 213 . Now, we have, upon the defendant’s own theory, this state of facts.

Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee v. H. Owen Maddux

Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 27, 2004

v. … Galbreath v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility, 121 S.W.3d 660, 665 (Tenn. 2003).

Athlon Sports Communications, Inc. v. Stephen C. Duggan

549 S.W.3d 107 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 8, 2018

Blasingame, 654 S.W.2d at 666 (quoting Brown 185 N.W.2d at 259). … Dedmon v. Steelman, 535 S.W.3d 431, 451 (Tenn. 2017) (quoting Powell v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 398 S.W.2d 727, 732 (Tenn. 1966)). “Where the reason fails the rule should not apply.” Id. (quoting Brown v.

American Can Co. v. McCanless

183 Tenn. 491 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1946

Chief Justice Green states and approves this rule in Brown v. Hows, 163 Tenn. 138, 144 , 40 S. … Jur., p. 460, concluding a discussion of the subject “Provisos”, and citing, among other cases, Brown v.

Cathey v. State

235 S.W.2d 601 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1951

235 S.W.2d 601 (1951) CATHEY v. STATE. Supreme Court of Tennessee. January 13, 1951. James R. Brown, Centerville, for plaintiff in error. Knox Bigham, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. TOMLINSON, Justice. … Compare Joyce v. State, 32 Tenn. 667 -668.

Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee v. Candes Vonniest Prewitt

Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 6, 2022

The Board points to Mabry v. … We find that Maddux v. Board of Professional Responsibility, 288 S.W.3d 340 (Tenn. 2009), is more comparable to this case.