Case law

State v. Reid

981 S.W.2d 166 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1998

Shettles v. State, 209 Tenn. 157, 161-62 , 352 S.W.2d 1, 3 (1961); Brewer v. State, 187 Tenn. 396, 400 , 215 S.W.2d 798, 800 (1948); Denton v. Woods, 86 Tenn. 37 , 5 S.W. 489 (1887); State v. … United States v. Hall, 152 F.3d 381, 398 (5th Cir.1998); see also Brown v.

Win Myint and Patti Kay Myint, et. ux. v. Allstate Insurance Company

Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1998

Should repair of an H-6 structure be denied, the owner must first appeal to the Housing Appeals Board for a variance. … See State v.

State v. Moore

774 S.W.2d 590 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1989

In United States v. … See also People v. Yellen, 704 P.2d 306 (Colo.) cert. denied 474 U.S. 1036 , 106 S.Ct. 603 , 88 L.Ed.2d 582 (1985); People v. Browning, 104 Mich.App. 741 , 306 N.W.2d 326 (1981); and Gilbreath v.

State v. Wilson

179 Tenn. 54 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 29, 1942

Southern General Life Company is a corporation under the laws of Tennessee, and that it owns the entire bond issue of the Obion River Drainage District No. 1, and that the bonds and coupons are due and unpaid; and that the board … Citing Flatley, Adm’r, v. Memphis & C. Railroad Co., 56 Tenn. (9 Heisk.), 230, and other cases. On page 236 in Flatley, Adm’r, v. Memphis & C.

Turner v. State

119 Tenn. 663 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1907

In the leading case of Dale v. … In Swan v.

Stewart v. Illinois Central Railroad

143 Tenn. 146 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1920

In State v. … In Traphagen v. Jersey City, 52 N. J.

Taylor v. State

191 Tenn. 670 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1950

Ashby v. State, 124 Tenn. 684, 697-699 , 139 S. W. 872 . See also Earless v. State, 189 Tenn. 419 , 225 S. W. (2d) 258, 259 . … Wiley v. State, 43 Tenn. 362 ; Moody v. State, 159 Tenn. 245 , 17 S. W. (2d) 919 ; Wynn v. State, 181 Tenn. 325 , 181 S. W. (2d) 332 ; McGhee v. State, 183 Tenn. 20 , 189 S. W. (2d) 826 , 164 A. L. R. 617.

White v. Dougherty

8 Tenn. 616 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1827

Everston v. Booth, 19 John. Rep. 63 ; Hawley v. Mancius, 7 John. Ch. Rep. 184; 17 Ves. 520. There are some exceptions to this rule, of which the supposed case would not be one. … Sugden, 387, Brown v. Gilman; 4 Wheat. 255 , 292. Besides taking a mortgage on these, he took a mortgage on three other lots.

White v. Dougherty

8 Tenn. 616 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1827

Everston v. Booth, 19 John. Rep. 63 ; Hawley v. Mancius, 7 John. Ch. Rep. 184; 17 Ves. 520. There are some exceptions to this rule, of which the supposed case would not be one. … Sugden, 387, Brown v. Gilman; 4 Wheat. 255 , 292. Besides taking a mortgage on these, he took a mortgage on three other lots.

White v. Dougherty

8 Tenn. 616 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1827

Everston v. Booth, 19 John. Rep. 63 ; Hawley v. Mancius, 7 John. Ch. Rep. 184; 17 Ves. 520. There are some exceptions to this rule, of which the supposed case would not be one. … Sugden, 387, Brown v. Gilman; 4 Wheat. 255 , 292. Besides taking a mortgage on these, he took a mortgage on three other lots.

Wdod Broadcasting Corp. v. Stokes

180 Tenn. 677 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 17, 1941

Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Chamberlain, supra; Pacific Telephone, etc., Co. v. Tax Commission, supra. … Ed., 165 ; Matson Navigation Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 297 U. S., 441 , 56 S. Ct., 553 , 80 L. Ed., 791 ; Western Live Stock v. Bureau of Revenue, 303 U. S., 250 , 58 S. Ct., 546 , 82 L. Ed., 823 , 115 A. L.

Charles Youree, Jr. v. Recovery House of East Tennessee, LLC

Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 22, 2025

(quoting Ferguson v. Brown, 291 S.W.3d 381, 387 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008))); Campbell v. Archer, 555 S.W.2d 110, 112– 13 (Tenn. 1977); see also Pryor, 338 S.W.3d at 885. … This Court reiterated the Continental Bankers elements without referring to the Allen factors in cases such as Electric Power Board of Chattanooga v. St.

Deaderick v. Lampson

58 Tenn. 523 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1872

Brown, John W. Mathes, and David J. Gibson, who, as the bill says, are now acting Elders of the congregation occupying the church building, and who are denominated “Quasi Trustees” of this congregation. … The rule is thus laid down, and we think correctly, by Judge Robertson, ’of the Supreme Court of Kentucky, in the case of Gartin v. Penick, 9th Am.

Deaderick v. Lampson

58 Tenn. 523 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1872

Brown, John W. Mathes, and David J. Gibson, who, as the bill says, are now acting Elders of the congregation occupying the church building, and who are denominated “Quasi Trustees” of this congregation. … The rule is thus laid down, and we think correctly, by Judge Robertson, ’of the Supreme Court of Kentucky, in the case of Gartin v. Penick, 9th Am.

Deaderick v. Lampson

58 Tenn. 523 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1872

Brown, John W. Mathes, and David J. Gibson, who, as the bill says, are now acting Elders of the congregation occupying the church building, and who are denominated “Quasi Trustees” of this congregation. … The rule is thus laid down, and we think correctly, by Judge Robertson, ’of the Supreme Court of Kentucky, in the case of Gartin v. Penick, 9th Am.

Chattanooga Machinery Co. v. Hargraves

111 Tenn. 476 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1903

Brown v. Waterman, 10 Cush., 117 ; Lichtenhein v. Boston & P. R. Co., 11 Cush., 70 ; Cass v. Railroad, 14 Allen, 448 ; Lane v. Railroad, 112 Mass., 455 ; Hoyt v. Jeffers, 30 Mich., 182 . … Nailing v. Nailing, 2 Sneed, 631 , 632.

Levy's Ladies Toggery, Inc. v. Bryant

183 Tenn. 372 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1946

The complainant’s counsel have cited Wolfe v. Bryant, 181 Tenn. 357 , 181 S. W. (2d) 343 , and Guaranty Mortgage Co., etc., v. Bryant, 179 Tenn. 579 , 168 S. … As stated by the Supreme Court of Washington in McDermott v.

Fry v. McCord Bros.

95 Tenn. 678 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1895

If any of the within claims have been settled, please advise the agency promptly relative thereto, and the secretary of your local board.” … Bank v. Bowdre, 8 Pick., 740 ; Banner v. The State, 16 Lea, 176 .

Third National Bank of St. Louis v. Hays

119 Tenn. 729 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1907

It is. said on behalf of Cheek & Co. that “the title to goods does not pass to the purchasers on their delivery on board cars, where the seller consigns them to his own order at the place of final delivery.” … In Means v.

Baker v. Hickman County

164 Tenn. 294 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1932

Co. v. Canal Board, 204 N. Y., 471 , 97 N. E., 964 , Ann. Cas., 1913C, 1228. … And in Berry v.