Case law

Shelby County Health Care Corp. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.

325 S.W.3d 88 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 13, 2010

Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn. 1997); Cowden v. Sovran Bank/Cent. S., 816 S.W.2d 741, 744 (Tenn. 1991). … Phifer v. Gulf Oil Co., 401 S.W.2d 782, 785 (Tenn. 1966); Rent-a-Car Co. v.

State v. Gulf American Fire & Casualty Co.

680 S.W.2d 455 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1984

In State v. … The Court of Appeals based its decision on a prior Kentucky Supreme Court decision, Louisville and Jefferson County Board of Zoning Adjustment v.

Marr v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

85 Tenn. 529 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1887

Sweatland v. Illinois & Mississippi Telegraph Company, 27 Iowa, 432 ; Telegraph Company v. Griswold, 37 Ohio State, 301 ; Manville v. Telegraph Company, 37 Iowa, 214 ; Graham v. … In addition to those already cited, we may refer to the following: Telegraph Company v. Cohen, 78 Georgia; Dryburg v. Telegraph Company, 35 Penn. State, 298; Telegraph Company v. Brown, 58 Texas, 170 ; Bartlett v.

State v. Wilson

179 Tenn. 54 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 29, 1942

Southern General Life Company is a corporation under the laws of Tennessee, and that it owns the entire bond issue of the Obion River Drainage District No. 1, and that the bonds and coupons are due and unpaid; and that the board … Citing Flatley, Adm’r, v. Memphis & C. Railroad Co., 56 Tenn. (9 Heisk.), 230, and other cases. On page 236 in Flatley, Adm’r, v. Memphis & C.

Cline v. State

204 Tenn. 251 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1958

It must be conceded that under the authority of Delaney v. … Williams v. State, 16 Okl.Cr. 217, 182 , P. 718, 723. “An ‘overt act’ is some act done to effect the object of the conspiracy.

Knoxville Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. City of Knoxville

153 Tenn. 536 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1925

In State v. … Citing Anderson v. Turbeville, 46 Tenn. (6 Cold.), 158; Railroad *Page 578 v. Bingham, 87 Tenn. 530 , 11 S.W. 705 ; Smith v. Railroad, 87 Tenn. 630 , 11 S.W. 709 ; Hamilton v.

Alfred Phosphate Co. v. Duck River Phosphate Co.

120 Tenn. 260 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1907

See Harding v. Goodlett, 3 Yerg., 52 , 24 Am. Dec., 546 ; Clack v. White, 2 Swan, 540 ; Rice v. Alley, 1 Sneed, 51 ; Carson v. … Waddell's Appeal, 84 Pa., 90 ; Board of Health v. Van Hoesen, 87 Mich., 533 , 49 N. W., 894 , 14 L. R. A., 114; Amador Queen Mining Co. v. De Witt, 73 Cal., 482 , 15 Pac., 74 ; Channel Co. v. R. R., 51 Cal., 269 .

Kighwaunda M. YARDLEY v. HOSPITAL HOUSEKEEPING SYSTEMS, LLC

470 S.W.3d 800 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 21, 2015

YARDLEY v. … Warnek v.

Wdod Broadcasting Corp. v. Stokes

180 Tenn. 677 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 17, 1941

Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Chamberlain, supra; Pacific Telephone, etc., Co. v. Tax Commission, supra. … Ed., 165 ; Matson Navigation Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 297 U. S., 441 , 56 S. Ct., 553 , 80 L. Ed., 791 ; Western Live Stock v. Bureau of Revenue, 303 U. S., 250 , 58 S. Ct., 546 , 82 L. Ed., 823 , 115 A. L.

Furnace v. City of Dayton

197 Tenn. 477 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1954

Bales v. Hamilton County, 170 Tenn. 371 , 95 S. W. (2d) 618 , and State ex rel. Smith v. City of Chattanooga, 176 Tenn. 642 , 144 S. W. (2d) 1096 . … In supplemental brief Hicks v. Rhea County, 189 Tenn. 383 , 225 S. W. (2d) 544 , and Donathan v. McMinn County, 187 Tenn. 220 , 213 S.

Hix v. Gosling

69 Tenn. 560 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1878

Ryland v. Brown, 2 Head, 275 ; Cohen v. Woollard, 2 Tenn. Ch., 689. And of course there is no pretense for sustaining the bill on the ground of interpleader. … Richards v. Chambers, 10 Ves., 580; Lee v. Muggeridge, 1 V. & B., 118; Sturgis v. Corp, 13 Ves., 190; Robinson v. Dart, Dud. Eq., 128.

Keith v. Clarke

72 Tenn. 718 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1880

It w-as settled in the case of Furman v. … In the case of Furman v.

Billy Overstreet v. TRW Commercial Steering Division - Concurring

Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 17, 2008

Code Ann. § 68-11-1502 (2006) (“Every patient entering and receiving care at a health care facility licensed by the board for licensing health care facilities has the expectation of and right to privacy for care received … See Baylaender v. Method, 594 N.E.2d 1317, 1324-25 (Ill. Ct. App. 1992); Alberts v. Devine, 479 N.E.2d 113, 118-20 (Mass. 1985); State ex rel. Dean v. Cunningham, 182 S.W.3d 561, 566-68 (Mo. 2006); Sorensen v.

Murray v. Allred

39 L.R.A. 249 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1897

Midland Rail Co. v. Checkley, L. R., 4 Eq., 19; Heat v. Gill, 7 Ch., 669; Attorney General v. Tomblin, 5 Ch. D., 762.) … Their fugitive and wandering existence within the limits of a particular tract, is uncertain, as said by Chief Justice Agnew, in Brown v. Vandergrift, 80 Pa., 147 , 148.

Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. v. Morgan

160 Tenn. 316 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1929

Crutcher v. Kentucky, 141 U. S., 61 ; Powell v. Pennsylvania, 127 U. S., 678 . … Co. v. Board of Public Utility Comrs., 254 U. S., 394 .

State v. Pike

978 S.W.2d 904 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1998

State v. Bland, 958 S.W.2d 651, 660 (Tenn.1997); State v. Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530, 539 (Tenn.1992). … Bland, 958 S.W.2d at 660 ; Brown, 836 *915 S.W.2d at 541-42 ; State v. West, 844 S.W.2d 144, 148 (Tenn.1992).

State of Tennessee v. Gerald Powers - Dissenting

Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 6, 2002

In Patton v. … See Alicia Brown, Comment, Evidence–State v. Hurley: Erosion of the Marital Privilege for Confidential Communications in Tennessee, 25 U. Mem. L. Rev. 835 (1995).

Charles Haynes v. Formac Stables, Inc.

463 S.W.3d 34 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 27, 2015

v. … In Fowler v.

Darryl F. Bryant, Sr. v. Darryl F. Bryant, Jr.

522 S.W.3d 392 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 19, 2017

enacting the Act of 1784, chapter 22, section 6. 1 Edward Scott, Laws of the State of Tennessee, Including Those of North Carolina Now in Force in this State From the Year 1715 to the Year 1820, Inclusive 294 (Heiskell & Brown … Board, 194 Tenn. 223 , 250 S.W.2d 82, 84 (1952); see also Runions, 207 S.W.2d at 1019 (reasoning that “the conveyance should operate, as nearly as possible, to produce the effect intended by the parties”).

Baker v. Promark Products West, Inc.

692 S.W.2d 844 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1985

transactions); Pisano v. … See, e.g., Bona v. Graefe, 264 Md. 69 , 285 A.2d 607 (1972); Leake v. Meredith, 221 Va. 14 , 267 S.E.2d 93 (1980); Martin v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., 353 A.2d 581 (Del.1976); and R. & W. Leasing v.