Case law

State Ex Rel. Day Pulverizer Co. v. Fitts

166 Tenn. 156 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 20, 1933

Wait v. Baker, 2 Exch. 1; Proctor & Gamble Co. v. Peters, White & Co., 233 N. Y., 97 , 134 N. E., 849 . … (Clarkson v. Stevens, 106 U. S., 505 .)

State v. Crump

834 S.W.2d 265 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 18, 1992

See State v. Smith, 834 S.W.2d 915 (Tenn.1992). Prior to Miranda v. … Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603-04 , 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2261-62 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416, 427 (1975); State v. Chandler, 547 S.W.2d 918, 920 (Tenn.1977).

Nashville, Etc., Railway Co. v. Norman

108 Tenn. 324 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1902

In Whirley v. … In Barr v.

Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Paint Rock Flume & Transportation Co.

128 Tenn. 277 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1913

Colcough v. N. & R. R. Co., 2 Head, 172 ; Tennessee & A. Co. v. Adams, 3 Head, 597 ; Railroad v. Cochrane, 3 Lea, 479 ; Parker v. Railroad , 13 Lea,. 670; Saunders v. Railroad, 101 Tenn., 206 , 47 S. W., 155 ; Doty v. … Gilmer v. Lime Point, 18 Cal., 229 ; Talbot v. Hudson, 16 Gray (Mass.), 417 ; Township Board of Education v. Hackmann, 48 Mo., 243 ; Coster v. Tide Water Co., 18 N. J. Eq., 54; Pocantico Waterworks v. Bird, 130 N.

Mechanics' Bank & Trust Co. v. Knoxville, S. & E. Ry. Co.

148 Tenn. 113 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1922

Oliver Manufacturing Company the aforesaid amount the Knoxville, Sevierville & Eastern Railway Company through its officers, acting under authority extended by the board of directors, does hereby assign, sell, and transfer … Marr v. Bank, 4 Cold., 471 ; Mosbey v. Williamson, 5 Heisk., 278 ; Comfort v. Patterson, 2 Lea, 671 ; Comfort v. McTeer, 7 Lea, 660 ; Tradesmen Pub. Co. v. Knoxville Car Wheel Co., 95 Tenn., 634 , 32 S. W., 1097 , 31 L.

Memphis Gayoso Gas Co. v. Williamson

56 Tenn. 314 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1872

Reynolds v. … In the case of Whirley v.

Smith v. Louisville & N. R.

131 Tenn. 531 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1914

See cases collated in note to Texas v. Missouri, etc., R. Co., 99 Tex., 516 , 91 S. W., 214 , 13 Ann. Cas., 1072, at 5 L. R. A. (N. S.), 783, and, on kindred subject-matters, Kates v. … The stock would have to remain on board cars during the delay incident to the switching operations, a matter affecting their being fed and watered.

D & E Construction Co. v. Robert J. Denley Co.

38 S.W.3d 513 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 19, 2001

City of Knoxville v. Brown, 195 Tenn. 501 , 260 S.W.2d 264, 268 (1953). … Co. v.

Johnson v. State

71 Tenn. 469 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1879

Metropolitan Board of Exercise v. John Barrie et als., 34 N. Y., 657 ; Calder v. Kirby, 5 Gray, 597 ; Commonwealth v. Brennan, 103 Mass., 70 ; Adams v. Hackett, 7 Fost., 289; State v. Phalen, 3 Harr., 441 ; Boyd v.

Jeffers v. Sterling Garrett Coal Co.

583 S.W.2d 594 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1979

In Blankenship v. Old Republic Ins. Co., 539 S.W.2d 23 (Tenn.1976) and Moore v. Old Republic Ins. … The case of Peabody Coal Co. v.

State of Tennessee v. Westley A. Albright - Dissenting

Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 11, 2018

The “Specialized Probation Conditions for Sex Offenders” required Albright to “attend, participate in, and pay for treatment or counseling with an approved treatment provider as deemed necessary by the Board, the Court or … App. 2014); State v. Boseman, 863 A.2d 704, 712 (Conn. App. Ct. 2004); State v. Monson, 518 N.W.2d 171, 173 (N.D. 1994); State v.

Batson v. Cigna Property & Casualty Companies

874 S.W.2d 566 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1994

In Mayes v. … Thus, this case is more akin to Gluck Brothers, Inc. v. Pollard, 221 Tenn. 383 , 426 S.W.2d 763 (1968) and Minton v.

Ritter v. Custom Chemicides, Inc.

912 S.W.2d 128 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1995

Prairie Production, Inc. v. Agchem Div. … Sperry Rand Corp., 128 Mich.App. 557 , 340 N.W.2d 326, 327-29 (1983); National Crane Corp. v. Ohio Steel Tube Co., 213 Neb. 782 , 332 N.W.2d 39, 44 (1983); Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas v.

Ali v. Fisher

145 S.W.3d 557 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 25, 2004

See Woodson v. Porter Brown Limestone Co., 916 S.W.2d 896, 907 (Tenn. 1996).3 The Court of Appeals has, however, addressed related issues in its negligent entrustment cases. In Mathis v. … McHaffie v.

Lacy & McGhee v. Sugarman

59 Tenn. 354 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1873

In the still later case of Maddox v. … In the case of Rhodes v.

Lacy & McGhee v. Sugarman

59 Tenn. 354 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1873

In the still later case of Maddox v. … In the case of Rhodes v.

Haverty Furniture Co. v. Foust

174 Tenn. 203 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1939

representative capacity or the drawing of papers, pleadings or documents or the performance of any act in such capacity in connection with' proceedings pending or prospective before any Court, commissioner, referee or any body, board … Sellent-Repent Corp. v. Queens Borough Gas & Electric Co., 160 Misc., 920 , 290 N. Y.

Sale Creek Coal & Coke Co. v. Priddy

117 Tenn. 168 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1906

“In Caruthers v. … In Lucey v.

Estate of Bell v. Shelby County Health Care Corp.

318 S.W.3d 823 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 31, 2010

Rev. 540, 544-45 (1957). 5 See also The Federalist No. 44, at 299 (James Madison) (Easton Press 1979); 2 Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution § 1398, at 272 (Boston, Little, Brown and Company, 5th … Doe v. Sundquist, 2 S.W.3d 919, 924 (Tenn. 1999). The Court in Miller v.

State v. Dewayne Butler, Fredrick D. Butler, and Eric D. Alexander

Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1998

Mark Ward & Sherrye Brown Michael E. … See Harmelin v.