Case law

Hudson v. Gaitan

675 S.W.2d 699 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1984

We hold that the owner of a ship in navigable waters owes to all who are on board for purposes not inimical to his legitimate interests the duty of exercising reasonable care under the circumstances of each case.” … Eddy v. Syracuse University, supra; Poulin v. Colby College, supra; O’Leary v. Coenen, supra.

State v. Edgefield & Kentucky Railroad

74 Tenn. 353 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1880

By petitioners’ solicitors we are cited to Fosdick v. Schall and Hale v. Frost, 9 Otto, and Meyer v. Johnston, 53 Ala., 237 . … This court held, in Bird v. Bank of Tennessee, 1 Sneed, 262 , and Pride v.

Mascari v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America Local Union No. 667

187 Tenn. 345 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1948

In the recent case of State v. … In the case of Bethlehem Steel Company et al. v. New York Labor Relations Board et al., 330 U. S. 767 , 67 S. Ct. 1026, 1029 , 91 L. Ed. 1234, 1245 , Mr.

Harrison v. Henderson

54 Tenn. 315 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1872

In case of Smith v. … In case of Girdner v.

Hill v. Eagle Bend Manufacturing, Inc.

942 S.W.2d 483 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1997

Fink v. … Townsend v. State, 826 S.W.2d 434, 436 (Tenn.1992); Cunningham v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 811 S.W.2d 888, 891 (Tenn.1991); Smith v. Smith’s Transfer Corp., 735 S.W.2d 221 (Tenn.1987); Boling v.

Henderson v. United States Steel Corp.

729 S.W.2d 85 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1987

Plaintiff then called the Worker’s Compensation Board and they advised her to get an attorney. … Scott in mid-May or June complied with the requirements of Masters v.

Tennessee Commercial Warehouse, Inc. v. Woods

603 S.W.2d 130 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1980

Automatic Merchandising Co. v. Atkins, 205 Tenn. 547 , 327 S.W.2d 328 (1959); Hamilton National Bank v. McCanless, 176 Tenn. 570 , 144 S.W.2d 768 (1940). As stated by the Court in Woods v. … Reynolds Tobacco Company, Phillip Morris, and Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation.

Maples v. State

565 S.W.2d 202 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1978

See also Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977), for further discussion of the issue of double jeopardy. … State v. Bowlus, 50 Tenn. 29 (1870). On March 7,1977, we released our opinion in Kane v.

Southern Greyhound Lines v. City of Knoxville

181 Tenn. 622 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1944

In the case of Fox v. … W. 1028 , it was held that a bill would lie to enjoin the enforcement of a void assessment by the State Board of Equalization and to enjoin the County Trustee from collecting the taxes. See also Southern Express Co. v.

Nutritional Support Services, Ltd. v. Taylor

803 S.W.2d 213 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1991

Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 , 103 S.Ct. 1933 , 76 L.Ed.2d 40 (1983), and Northcross v. Board of Education, 611 F.2d 624 (6th Cir.1979). … In Kahn v.

Sale v. Eichberg

52 L.R.A. 894 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 24, 1900

Thus in Ressequie v. … Brown, in his note to Ressequie v.

Graham v. Life Ass'n

98 Tenn. 48 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1896

Champion, Head & Brown, general counsel for the company, and asked their advice. … Counsel cite, in support of this contention, the case of Morgan v. Duffy, 10 Pickle, in which it was said, viz.: £ ‘Actual malice, in the sense of ill will or personal hatred, need not be shown.

Chism v. Mid-South Milling Co., Inc.

762 S.W.2d 552 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1988

See generally Payne v. The Western & Atlantic Railroad Company., 81 Tenn. 507 (1884); Whittaker v. Care-More, Inc., 621 S.W.2d 395 (Tenn.App.1981); Little v. … E.g., Sheets v.

State v. Harmon

775 S.W.2d 583 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1989

In United States v. … See Murray v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 108 S.Ct. 2529 , 101 L.Ed.2d 472 (1988). In Murray, 108 S.Ct. at page 2533 , citing from Nix v.

Tharpe v. Dunlap

51 Tenn. 674 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 17, 1871

Brown, a witness for *684 the defendant, proves that he wrote the deed of trust, as requested by John C. … See Mills v. Haynes, 3 Head, 335 , 336; Goss v. Singleton, 2 Head, 77 ; Breedlove v. Stump, 3 Yer., 266 , 267; Robertson v. Sublett, 6 Hum., 316 .

Tharpe v. Dunlap

51 Tenn. 674 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 17, 1871

Brown, a witness for *684 the defendant, proves that he wrote the deed of trust, as requested by John C. … See Mills v. Haynes, 3 Head, 335 , 336; Goss v. Singleton, 2 Head, 77 ; Breedlove v. Stump, 3 Yer., 266 , 267; Robertson v. Sublett, 6 Hum., 316 .

R. C. Owen Co. v. Butler

215 Tenn. 599 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1965

Owen Co. v. … Owen Co. v.

Brett Rosasco v. West Knoxville Painters, LLC

Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 18, 2021

See Hames v. State, 808 S.W.2d 41, 44 (Tenn. Ct. … In contrast, in Jackson v.

Sepulveda v. State

90 S.W.3d 633 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 1, 2002

State v. Garrison, 40 S.W.3d 426, 429 (Tenn.2000). In Strickland v. … State v. Middlebrooks, 840 S.W.2d 317, 336 (Tenn.1992); see also State v. Brown, 756 S.W.2d 700, 703 (Tenn.Crim.App.1988).

State v. Hartman

42 S.W.3d 44 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 18, 2001

They testified that the driver of the patrol car was a white male, with shoulder-length brown hair, wearing a green military-type jacket. … See State v.