Case law

State v. Wade

863 S.W.2d 406 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1993

In Black v. … In Wilson v.

McCallie v. Mayor of Chattanooga

40 Tenn. 317 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1859

On the 21st of August, 1854, by an ordinance of the board, a subscription of $100,000 of the stock of said “Wills' Yalley ” Road was made on behalf of the corporation of Chattanooga. … This case is wholly unlike the case of The State of New Jersey v. Wilson, 7 Cranch, 164 .

Marler v. Claunch

221 Tenn. 693 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1968

Jennings *699 v. Jennings (1932) 165 Tenn. 295 , 54 S.W.2d 961 ; Shannon v. Board of Education of Kingsport (1955) 199 Tenn. 250 , 286 S.W.2d 571 , and other cases there cited. … The defendants attempt to distinguish the present case from Commerce Union Bank v. Albert, supra, on the grounds (1) that Mr.

Albert v. Williamson County

798 S.W.2d 758 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1990

In King v. … Earnest v.

Buice v. Scruggs Equipment Co.

194 Tenn. 129 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1952

Cobble v. Langford, 190 Tenn. 385 , 230 S. W. (2d) 194 . … Dillard & Coffin Co. v. Richmond Cotton Oil Co., 140 Tenn. 290 , 204 S. W. 758 ; State ex rel. v. Holston *138 Trust Co., 168 Tenn. 546 , 79 S. W. (2d) 1012 .

Deming v. Nichols

135 Tenn. 295 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1916

State, etc., v. Taxing Dist. of Shelby County, 16 Lea, 251 ; State v. Mason, 3 Lea, 649 ; Greenwood v. State, 6 Baxt., 567 , 32 Am. Rep., 539 . … Mayor of Nashville v. Fisher, 1 Shan. Cas., 345 .

Dickson v. Dickson's Heirs

9 Tenn. 110 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1826

The act referred to in the decree, was passed in 1808, ch. 31; the first and second sections of which give the circuit courts power to grant divorces for different causes; one of which is the abandonment of the bed and board … The wretch who, for an infamous crime, has b een foi v^-ar- confined in a state prison, and his wife divorced *114 from him for this cause, may emigrate to the stale of /permessee?

Mooney v. Sneed

30 S.W.3d 304 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 13, 2000

State v. Sliger, 846 S.W.2d 262, 263 (Tenn.1993). See also Gleaves, 15 S.W.3d at 802 ; Worley v. Weigels, Inc., 919 S.W.2d 589, 593 (Tenn.1996); Owens v. State, 908 S.W.2d 923, 926 (Tenn.1995). … Prior to its repeal, Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-26-102(4) (1980) defined “health care provider” for purposes of the Medical Malpractice Review Board and Claims Act of 1975: " 'Health care provider' includes but is not limited to

State v. Campbell

Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 20, 2001

Brown, Judge No. … State v. Lavender, 967 S.W.2d 803, 806 (Tenn. 1998); State v. Fletcher, 805 S.W.2d 785, 788 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1991).

State ex rel. Rambo v. Maloney

92 Tenn. 62 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1892

State of Tennessee v. Glenn, 7 Heis., 472; State of Tennessee v. McKee, 8 Lea, 24 ; State of Tennessee v. Leonard, 2 Pickle, 485 . … Powers v. Hurst, 2 Hum., 24 ; Brewer v. Davis, 9 Hum., 209 ; Keys v. Mason, 3 Sneed, 8 . The rule is different, however, under the Constitution of 1870.

Boillin-Harrison Co. v. Lewis & Co.

182 Tenn. 342 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1945

Board of Trade of Chicago v. Christie [Grain, etc., Co.], supra, 198 U. S. (236), 249, 25 S & Ct. 637, 639, 49 L. Ed. 1031 .” Lyons Milling Co. v. Goffe & Carkener, supra [8 Cir., 46 F. (2d) 241, 247, 83 A. L. R. 501].’ … The Supreme Court of the United States has very clearly distinguished *363 these transactions from wagering or gambling contracts in its opinion in the case cited by the Conrt of Appeals of Board of Trade, etc., v.

State v. Chalmers

28 S.W.3d 913 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 5, 2000

I had some kind of automatic rifle, it had a clip in it, black and brown color. “Dre” had a .380 automatic or something, look [sic] black to me. I think “Black” had a shotgun. … Burns, 979 S.W.2d 276 (Tenn.1998); State v. Howell, 868 S.W.2d 238 (Tenn.1993); State v. Boyd, 797 S.W.2d 589 (Tenn.1990); State v. Johnson, 762 S.W.2d 110 (Tenn.1988); State v.

State ex rel. Pitts v. Nashville Baseball Club

127 Tenn. 292 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1912

Richardson v. Young, 122 Tenn., 471 , 125 S. W., 664 ; Kelly v. State, 123 Tenn., 516 , 132 S. W., 193 ; Brown v. Sullivan County, 126 Tenn., 689 , 151 S. W., 50 ; Martin v. … Arnold v. Knoxville, supra. The supposed holding in Hayes v.

State v. Lyons

802 S.W.2d 590 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1990

See, e.g., State v. Wilkins, 655 S.W.2d 914 (Tenn.1983); State v. Thomas, 635 S.W.2d 114 (Tenn. 1982); State v. Schimpf 782 S.W.2d 186, 188-189 (Tenn.Cr.App.1989); State v. Alcorn, 741 S.W.2d 135, 138-139 (Tenn.Cr. … Marion County Board of Commissioners v. Marion County Election Commission, 594 S.W.2d 681, 685 (Tenn.1980); see also State v. Hudson, 562 S.W.2d 416, 418-419 (Tenn.1978).

First Community Bank, N. A. v. First Tennessee Bank, N. A.

Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 14, 2015

―Each conspirator must have the intent to accomplish this common purpose, and each must know of the other‘s intent.‖ Brown v. Birman Managed Care, Inc., 42 S.W.3d 62, 67 (Tenn. 2001) (citing Dale, 208 S.W.2d at 353-54). … Brown, __ S.W.3d __, No. E2014-00673-SC-R11-CD, 2015 WL 7748275, at *6 (Tenn. Dec. 2, 2015); State v. Wooden, __ S.W.3d __, E2014-01069-SC-R11-CD, 2015 WL 7748034, at *5 (Tenn. Dec. 2, 2015).

City of Nashville v. Dad's Auto Accessories, Inc.

154 Tenn. 194 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1926

See Railroad Co. v. Cemetery Co., 116 Tenn., 400 , 94 S. W., 69 . Of the latter class was the recent case of Chattanooga v. N. C. & St. L. Ry., 284 S. W., — -,- cited by petitioner. … In Railroad v. Campbell, 109 Tenn., 640 , 75 S.

McConnell v. State

12 S.W.3d 795 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 14, 2000

While it is true that a plea bargain agreement is contractual, see State v. Howington, 907 S.W.2d 403, 407 (Tenn. 1995), contract principles extend only so far, accord State v. Brown, 928 S.W.2d 453, 456 (Tenn. Crim. … .”); Forbe rt v.

State Ex Rel. Ball v. City of Knoxville

177 Tenn. 162 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1941

In City of Knoxville v Smith, 176 Tenn., 73 , 138 S. … Anderson v. City of Knoxville, 176 Tenn., 541 , 144 S.

Shelby Abbott v. Blount County, Tennessee

Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 10, 2001

In Gaston v. Tenn. Farmers Mut. Ins. … (quoting Bill Brown Constr. Co. v. Glens Falls Ins. Co., 818 S.W.2d 1, 13 (Tenn. 1991)). Under this principle, an insurer “may not fail to act and then seek to enforce exclusionary terms of a policy.” Id. at 820.

Win Myint and wife Patti KI. Myint v. Allstate Insurance Company

970 S.W.2d 920 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1998

Should repair of an H-6 structure be denied, the owner must first appeal to the Housing Appeals Board for a variance. … See State v.