Case law

Black v. Corder

217 Tenn. 613 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1966

Rose & Co. v. Snyder, 185 Tenn. 499 , 206 S.W.2d 897 (1947); Mason-Dixon Lines v. Lett, 201 Tenn. 171 , 297 S.W.2d 93 (1956). … In Snavely v.

Chumbley v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.

166 Tenn. 35 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 20, 1933

Goetz v. Smith, 152 Tenn., 451 , 278 S. W., 417 . As said in Davis v. … Of similar import are our cases of Cannon v. Mathes, 8 Heisk., 504 ; Kizer v. State, 140 Tenn., 591 , and House v. Creveling, 147 Tenn., 598 . House v.

Cumberland Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. United Electric Railway Co.

93 Tenn. 492 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1894

Co. v. Baker, L. … See, also, Gay v. Knoxville, 85 Tenn., 92 ; Street Ry. Co. v. Doyle, 88 Tenn., 747 ; Myers v. St. Louis, 82 Mo., 378 ; Abendarth v. Manhattan Ry. (N. Y.), 19 Am. St. Rep., 461 .

Mayor of Nashville v. Knight

80 Tenn. 700 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1883

In the case of Chandler v. … The complainant is entitled to hold all of the parties on both bonds liable for the recovery: Odom v. Owen, 2 Baxt., 446 ; McGlothlin v. Wyatt, 1 Lea, 717 .

Matill v. City of Chattanooga

175 Tenn. 65 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1939

In State v. Railroad Co., 124 Tenn., 1 , 135 S. W., 773 , 775, Ann. … The latter Ordinance creates a Board of Electrical Examiners for Chattanooga and provides for the licensing of persons and firms “engaged in the business of electrical contracting and for the licensing of electricians and

Whitehaven Utility District of Shelby County v. Ramsay

215 Tenn. 435 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1964

State v. McPhail, 156 Tenn. 459 , 2 S.W.2d 413 (1927); Samuel v. King, 158 Tenn. 546 , 14 S.W.2d 963 (1928); Robertson v. Davis, 169 Tenn. 659 , 90 S.W.2d 746 (1936); Bernard v. … In Consolidated Gray-Fordtown-Colonial Heights Utility District v.

Chattanooga v. Norman

92 Tenn. 73 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 11, 1892

Knoxville v. King, 7 Lea, 441 . There is no doubt, therefore, that had the ordinance “covered the whole city it would have' been valid. … XV1IL, pages 747, 748, and cases cited; Railroad Co. v. Richmond, 96 U. S., 521 (Lawyers’ Co-op.

Bird Bros. v. Southern Surety Co.

139 Tenn. 11 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1917

Co. v. Falls, 92 Tenn., 607 , 22 S. W., 856 . … Stone Co. v. Board of Publication, 91 Tenn., 200 , 18 S. W., 406 ; Bassett v. Bertorelli, 92 Tenn., 548 , 22 S. W., 423 ; Reeves v. Henderson, 90 Tenn., 522 , 18 S. W., 242 ; Cole Mfg. Co. v. Falls, supra.

Cook v. State

170 Tenn. 245 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 23, 1936

The plaintiff in error, a young man, came to Jackson on March 23, 1935, and applied for board with Mrs. Lanier and was taken in by her. … In Anderson v.

Johnson v. State

100 Tenn. 254 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1898

It appears that the Board of Mayor and Aldermen had laid out and ordered to be opened, a street, eighteen feet in width, in front of defendant’s property. … The capacity to know right from wrong, and to know that the particular act being committed is wrong, is the rule recognized in -this State for testing criminal accountability. *261 Wilcox v. State, 10 Pickle, 117 .

Hutton v. Campbell

78 Tenn. 170 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1882

Ridley, 2 Yer., 63 ; Love v. Smith, 4 Yer., 117 ; McBee v. State, Meigs, 133; Pratt v. Phillips, 1 Sneed, 543 . … Cas., 271 ; Browning v. Har- *174 ford, 5 Denio, 586 ; Shannon v. McMullin, 25 Gratt., 211 .

Louisville, Nashville & Great Southern R. R. v. Harris

77 Tenn. 180 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1882

: Hibbard v. … Y., 455 ; State v. Campbell, 32 N. J. L., 309; Fulton v. Grand Trunk R. Co., 17 U. C., 428. The strict rule thus laid down ought, perhaps, to be *187 confined to willful violations of contract upon proper demand.

State Ex Rel. Campbell County v. Delinquent Taxpayers of 1939

183 Tenn. 64 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1945

In Robbins v. Phillips, 175 Tenn. 568, 574 , 136 S. … It is shown by the stipulation that the proceeds of this levy were used to pay off warrants issued to the Sheriff of Fentress County for jail turnkeys and for boarding prisoners.

Jones v. Matthews

76 Tenn. 84 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1881

The discussion resuscitates the famous cases of Walton v. Shelley, 1 Term. Rep., 296, and Jordaine v. … Justice Field, more than half a century afterwards, in Davis v. Brown, 94 U. S., 426 . The same thing had been done in the still earlier case of Townsend v. Bush, 1 Conn., 260 . The case of Stump v.

Stallings v. Jones

193 Tenn. 200 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1951

In East Tennessee V. & G. Railroad Co. v. … Y., 463; Brown on Statute of Frauds, 36; Taylor’s Landlord and Tenant, 21.” *204 The language of the lease contract now before us is capable of no other construction than that the complainant may continue in possession of

Lunati v. Progressive Building & Loan Ass'n

167 Tenn. 161 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1934

See United States Building & Loan Association v. Silverman, 85 Pa., 394 . … Nelson v. North, 1 Overt., 33 ; Swope v. Jordan, 107 Tenn., 166 , 64 S. W., 52 ; Gardenhire v. McCombs, 1 Sneed, 83 ; Brandon v. Green, 7 Humph., 130 ; McAdoo v. Smith, 5 Baxt., 695 .

City of Charleston v. Ailey

210 Tenn. 211 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 4, 1962

In Marion County v. … Knoxville v. Harth, 105 Tenn. 436 , 58 S.W. 650 , 80 Am.St.Rep. 901 ; Knoxville v. Hunt, 156 Tenn. 7 , 299 S.W. 789 ; Wood v. Foster & Creighton Co., 191 Tenn. 478 , 235 S.W.2d 1 . In Wood v.

Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. Stewart, Estes & Donnell

232 S.W.3d 18 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 20, 2007

Similarly, another early case, Shadden v. … Inc. v.

William Andrew Dixon v. Flora J. Holland, Warden and William Andrew Dixon v. Donal Campbell, Commissioner of TDOC

Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 4, 2001

Dixon was scheduled for his first parole board hearing on April 30, 1998. Pursuant to statute, the board of probation and parole contacted the sentencing trial judge regarding Dixon’s upcoming parole hearing. … McLaney v. Bell, 59 S.W.3d 90, 92 (Tenn. 2001) (citing State v. Ritchie, 20 S.W.3d 624, 630 (Tenn. 2000)). The petition must establish that a judgment is void. Id.

Super Flea Market of Chattanooga, Inc. v. Olsen

677 S.W.2d 449 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1984

See, e.g., Beltran v. Cohen, 303 F.Supp. 889 (N.D.Gal.1969), and Detwiler v. United States, 406 F.Supp. 695 (E.D.Pa.1975). Plaintiffs’ argument is without merit. … Big Fork Mining Co. v. Tennessee Water Quality Control Board, 620 S.W.2d 515, 519 (Tenn.App.1981), citing United States Civil Service Commission v.