Case law

Hanover Insurance Company v. Haney

221 Tenn. 148 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1968

Tobacco Board of Trade (warehousemen) and representatives of the tobacco companies, several weeks prior to the actual closing date, and after a survey of the market is made to determine how much unsold tobacco is in the area … Marron v. Scarbrough, 44 Tenn.App. 414 , 314 S.W.2d 165 .”

Sutton v. State

33 L.R.A. 589 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1896

Vanzant v. Waddel, 2 Yer., 259 ; Wally v. Kennedy, Ib., 555; Bank v. Cooper, Ib., 600; Jones v. Perry, 10 Yer., 71 ; Sheppard v. Johnson, 2 Hum., 296 ; Budd v. The State, 3 Hum., 483 ; Mayor v. … Dearmon, 2 Sneed, 103 ; Brown v. Haywood, 4 Heis., 357; State v. Burnett, 6 Heis., 186; State v. Rauscher, 1 Lea, 97 ; Davis v. The State, 3 Lea, 379 ; Maney v. The State, 6 Lea, 221 ; Hatcher v.

Continental Bankers Life Insurance Co. of the South v. Bank of Alamo

578 S.W.2d 625 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1979

See, e. g., Fisser v. International Bank, 282 F.2d 231 (2d Cir. 1960); Majestic Co. v. Orpheum Circuit, Inc., 21 F.2d 720 (8th Cir. 1927); Brown v. Margrande Compania Naviera S. … Ass’n v.

Biggs v. Beeler

180 Tenn. 198 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1943

Query: If this is all that was intended, then, since the Legislature has the inherent power to tax (Vertrees v. State Board, 141 Tenn., 645 , at page 658, 214 S. … For example, in Ms able opinion in the leading and carefully considered case of Vertrees v. State Board of Elections, 141 Tenn., at page 660 , 214 S. W., at page 741, Mr.

Baptist Hospital v. City of Nashville

156 Tenn. 589 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1928

The corporation is controlled by a Board of Directors, chosen by the Tennessee Baptist Convention. … Church, South, v. Hinton, 92 Tenn., 188 , and previous decisions referred to therein. It can hardly be urged at this period in our development that such an institution is not a charity.

Whitehaven Utility District of Shelby County v. Ramsay

215 Tenn. 435 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1964

State v. McPhail, 156 Tenn. 459 , 2 S.W.2d 413 (1927); Samuel v. King, 158 Tenn. 546 , 14 S.W.2d 963 (1928); Robertson v. Davis, 169 Tenn. 659 , 90 S.W.2d 746 (1936); Bernard v. … In Consolidated Gray-Fordtown-Colonial Heights Utility District v.

Mannery v. WAL-MART DISTRIBUTION CENTER

69 S.W.3d 193 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 1, 2002

Townsend v. State, 826 S.W.2d 434, 437 (Tenn.1992); Humphrey v. David Witherspoon, Inc., 734 S.W.2d 315, 315 (Tenn.1987). … Id.; Cook v. Great West Casualty Co., 779 S.W.2d 365, 366-67 (Tenn.1989); F.H. Lawson Co. v. Rambo, 225 Tenn. 217 , 465 S.W.2d 732, 735 (1971); Matthews v.

Mendolia v. State

192 Tenn. 656 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1951

Brown v. State, 186 Tenn. 378 , 210 S. W. (2d) 670 . … In Glasgow v.

Pruitt v. Lambert

201 Tenn. 291 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1957

Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co., 336 U.S. 490 , 69 S.Ct. 684 , 93 L.Ed. 834 ; International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Hanke, 339 U.S. 470 , 70 S.Ct. 773 ; Building Service Emp. Intern. Union v. … In Watson Co. v.

Black v. Corder

217 Tenn. 613 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1966

Rose & Co. v. Snyder, 185 Tenn. 499 , 206 S.W.2d 897 (1947); Mason-Dixon Lines v. Lett, 201 Tenn. 171 , 297 S.W.2d 93 (1956). … In Snavely v.

Cumberland Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. United Electric Railway Co.

93 Tenn. 492 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1894

Co. v. Baker, L. … See, also, Gay v. Knoxville, 85 Tenn., 92 ; Street Ry. Co. v. Doyle, 88 Tenn., 747 ; Myers v. St. Louis, 82 Mo., 378 ; Abendarth v. Manhattan Ry. (N. Y.), 19 Am. St. Rep., 461 .

Madison v. Ducktown Sulphur, Copper & Iron Co.

113 Tenn. 331 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1904

Laches and neglect are always discountenanced, and therefore from the beginning of this jurisdiction there was always a limitation to suits in this court.” 3 Brown, Ch. Rep., 640, note. … Banbury Board of Health, L. R., 1 Eq., 47, 51; Goodson v. Richardson, 9 L. R., Ch., 223, 224; Robinson v. Baugh, 31 Mich., 291 ; Susquehanna Fertilizer Co. v. Malone, 73 Md., 268, 282 , 20 Atl., 900 , 9 L. R.

Mayor of Nashville v. Knight

80 Tenn. 700 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1883

In the case of Chandler v. … The complainant is entitled to hold all of the parties on both bonds liable for the recovery: Odom v. Owen, 2 Baxt., 446 ; McGlothlin v. Wyatt, 1 Lea, 717 .

Matill v. City of Chattanooga

175 Tenn. 65 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1939

In State v. Railroad Co., 124 Tenn., 1 , 135 S. W., 773 , 775, Ann. … The latter Ordinance creates a Board of Electrical Examiners for Chattanooga and provides for the licensing of persons and firms “engaged in the business of electrical contracting and for the licensing of electricians and

Searle v. Juvenile Court for Williamson County

188 S.W.3d 547 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 13, 2006

Lea v. … See South Carolina v.

Chattanooga v. Norman

92 Tenn. 73 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 11, 1892

Knoxville v. King, 7 Lea, 441 . There is no doubt, therefore, that had the ordinance “covered the whole city it would have' been valid. … XV1IL, pages 747, 748, and cases cited; Railroad Co. v. Richmond, 96 U. S., 521 (Lawyers’ Co-op.

Bird Bros. v. Southern Surety Co.

139 Tenn. 11 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1917

Co. v. Falls, 92 Tenn., 607 , 22 S. W., 856 . … Stone Co. v. Board of Publication, 91 Tenn., 200 , 18 S. W., 406 ; Bassett v. Bertorelli, 92 Tenn., 548 , 22 S. W., 423 ; Reeves v. Henderson, 90 Tenn., 522 , 18 S. W., 242 ; Cole Mfg. Co. v. Falls, supra.

Cook v. State

170 Tenn. 245 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 23, 1936

The plaintiff in error, a young man, came to Jackson on March 23, 1935, and applied for board with Mrs. Lanier and was taken in by her. … In Anderson v.

Hutton v. Campbell

78 Tenn. 170 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1882

Ridley, 2 Yer., 63 ; Love v. Smith, 4 Yer., 117 ; McBee v. State, Meigs, 133; Pratt v. Phillips, 1 Sneed, 543 . … Cas., 271 ; Browning v. Har- *174 ford, 5 Denio, 586 ; Shannon v. McMullin, 25 Gratt., 211 .

Louisville, Nashville & Great Southern R. R. v. Harris

77 Tenn. 180 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1882

: Hibbard v. … Y., 455 ; State v. Campbell, 32 N. J. L., 309; Fulton v. Grand Trunk R. Co., 17 U. C., 428. The strict rule thus laid down ought, perhaps, to be *187 confined to willful violations of contract upon proper demand.