Case law

Scott v. Burton

173 Tenn. 147 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1938

It is an eleemosynary, nonprofit corporation, and the defendants constitute a majority of its board of trustees. … Hale v. Johnston, 140 Tenn., 182 , 203 S. W., 949 ; Vance v. Shelby County, 152 Tenn., 141 , 273 S. W., *152 557; Johnson v. Hamilton County, 156 Tenn., 298 , 1 S.

Liberty Cash Grocers, Inc. v. Atkins

202 Tenn. 448 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1957

Pitts v. Nashville Baseball Club, 127 Tenn. 292 , 154 S.W. 1151 . … Co. v. California State Board of Equalization, 137 Cal. App.2d 87 , 290 P.2d 20 .

Cynthia Bratton v. Michael Bratton - Concurring/Dissenting

Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 30, 2004

See Spurlock v. Brown, 18 S.W. 868, 871-72 (Tenn. 1892); Sanders v. Sanders, 288 S.W.2d 473, 477 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1955). … See Gilley v. Gilley, 778 S.W.2d 862, 864 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1989).

Moody v. State

160 S.W.3d 512 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 22, 2005

MOODY v. … See Stephenson v.

State ex rel. Nashville Pure Milk Co. v. Town of Shelbyville

192 Tenn. 194 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 7, 1951

Riesland v. Bailey, 146 Ore. 574 , 31 P. (2d) 183 , 92 A. L. R. 1207; Sansom v. Mercer, 68 Tex. 488 , 5 S. W. 62 , 2 Am. St. Rep. 505 ; Baird v. Board of Sup’rs of Kings County, 138 N. Y. 95 , 33 N. E. 827 , 20 L. R. … In the case of City of Wewoka v.

Faught v. Estate of Faught

730 S.W.2d 323 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 18, 1987

See Spurlock v. Brown, 91 Tenn. 241 , 18 S.W. 868, 873 (1892); Mayrand v. Mayrand, 194 Ill. 45 , 61 N.E. 1040, 1041 (1901). … In Mayrand v.

Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Jones

103 Tenn. 245 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1899

Webster v. Helm, 9 Pickle, 325 ; Stiefel v. Clark, 9 Bax., 470 . … Young v. Mutual Ins. Co., 47 S. W. R., 428; Williams v. Otey, 8 Hum., 563 ; Loughmiller v. Harris, 2 Heis., 553; Brown v. Foote, 2 Tenn. Ch., 255, 263; Harris v. Smith, 14 Pickle, 286 ; Whatley v. Ogles by, 44 S. W. R.

Virginia Iron v. Hamilton

107 Tenn. 705 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1901

It fell on the running board, and rolled off and hit plaintiff on the head.” … Iron Co. v. Pace, 101 Tenn., 484 .

Thompson v. City of Chattanooga

143 Tenn. 477 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1920

Los Angeles, 141 Cal., 503 , 75 Pac., 111 ; Columbus v. Mc *485 Daniel, 117 Ga., 823 , 45 S. E., 59 Atchison v. King, 9 Kan., 550 ; Lincoln v. Finkle, 41 Neb., 575 , 59 N. W., 915 ; Reining v . City of Buffalo, 102 N. … The case of Railroad v. Brown, 125 Tenn., 354 , 143 S.

Pool v. Metric Constructors, Inc.

681 S.W.2d 543 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1984

Plaintiff accepted Defendant’s offer of $10.50 per hour, $25.00 per diem per day for room and board, and $.20 per mile travel reimbursement. … Anderson v. Sam Monday Motors, supra; Eslinger v. F & B Frontier Construction Co., supra.

Walker v. Williams

215 Tenn. 195 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1964

See Comeau v. Comeau, 285 Mass. 578 , 189 N.E. 588 , 92 A.L.R. 1002 ; Greenfield v. Miller, 173 Wis. 184 , 180 N.W. 834 , 12 A.L.R. 982 ; Page v. Murphy, 194 Minn. 607 , 261 N.W. 443 ; Sanders v. … Brown, 73 Ariz. 116 , 238 P.2d 941 ; Goldberg v. Straus, Fla., 45 So.2d 883 ; McNamara v. Hall, 38 Wash.2d 864 , 233 P.2d 852 ; Keretian v. Asadourian, 349 Ill.App. 390 , 110 N.E.2d 679 ; Maher v.

Emerson v. Porter

203 Tenn. 492 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 2, 1958

Winfree v. State, 175 Tenn. 427, 430 , 135 S.W. 2d 454 . … In Cochran v.

Bowers by Bowers v. City of Chattanooga

826 S.W.2d 427 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1992

Hale v. Johnston, 140 Tenn. 182, 197 , 203 S.W. 949 , 953, (1918). … As Chief Justice Shepard of Indiana said in Peavler v. Board of Commissioners, 528 N.E.2d 40, 45 (Ind.1988): The distinction between planning and operational functions is a standard, rather than a precise rule.

Deitch v. City of Chattanooga

195 Tenn. 245 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1953

Bristol v. Burrow, 73 Tenn. 128 ; McMinnville v. Stroud, 109 Tenn. 569 , 72 S. W. 949 ; Kelly & Co. v. Conner, 122 Tenn. 339, 390 , 123 S. W. 622 , 25 L. R A., N. S., 201; City of Nashville v. … Brinkley v. State, 125 Tenn. 371, 386 , 143 S. W. 1120 , 1123.

Adams v. Mayor of Somerville

39 Tenn. 363 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1859

It is no valid objection, therefore, that the Board, in the exercise of this discretionary power, has proceeded upon a different principle, or in a different mode, from that adopted by the Legislature in respect to State … Mayor and Aldermen of Columbia v. Beasly, 1 Hum., 232 , 240. The principle of taxation applicable to property, is altogether impracticable in regard to privileges.

Brooks v. McCoy

192 Tenn. 586 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1951

Wells v. McCanless, 184 Tenn. 293 , 198 S. … Probably counsel have fallen into this error by reason of the fact that the Commissioner of that Department exercises some quasi-judicial functions, but this Department is an administrative board only and its commissioner

Elvis Presley Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Memphis

Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 24, 2021

Consequently, consideration of EPE’s Supplemental Plan, which was scheduled for EDGE’s September 2017 board meeting, was removed from the agenda. … Jackson v. Smith, 387 S.W.3d 486, 491 (Tenn. 2012) (citing Creech v. Addington, 281 S.W.3d 363, 376 (Tenn. 2009); Richardson v. Tenn. Bd. of Dentistry, 913 S.W.2d 446, 459 (Tenn. 1995)).

State ex rel. Roberts v. Henderson

223 Tenn. 115 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1969

Gouge v. … Lockhart, 69 Tenn. 195 ; Keith v. Funding Board, 127 Tenn. 441 , 155 S.W. 142 ), this Court does not have the right to declare a policy or rule contrary thereto.

Hopkins v. Railroad

32 L.R.A. 354 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1896

Davis v. Fall River, 155 Mass., 96 ; Atherton v. Brown, 14 Mass., 153 . In Michigan the' same practice prevails. In Carver v. … Brown v. Frost, Hay’s Rep., 131, 132; Turnbull v. Rivers, 3 McCord, 131 ; Davis v. Railroad, 21 S. C., 101.

State v. Jones

220 Tenn. 477 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1966

Childress v. State, 133 Tenn. 121 , 179 S.W. 643 (1915); Juvenile Court of Shelby County v. State ex rel., 139 Tenn. 549 , 201 S.W. 771 (1918); State ex rel. Jackson v. Bomar, 215 Tenn. 9 , 383 S.W.2d 41 (1964). … him to a juvenile institution, he could later be transferred to the penitentiary upon recommendation of the Superintendent and approval of the Commissioner of Corrections; or, in the alternative, his name certified to the Board