Case law

McClanahan v. McClanahan

104 Tenn. 217 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1900

In Thomas v. … In Lyle v.

Wattenbarger v. Tullock

197 Tenn. 279 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1954

Vineyard v. Vineyard, 26 Tenn. App., 232, 239 , 170 S. W. (2d) 917 . Nor does the fact that the suit was dismissed as to the Bank make it a final decree that is appealable by the complainants. In Isreal v. … McMorrow v. Hunt, 137 Tenn. 243 , 192 S. W. 931 , that this supervisory or superintending writ may be granted in a proper case .although the decree is not final. In the case of Conners v.

Oman v. Delius

162 Tenn. 192 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1931

It was so held in Hughes v. Brown, 88 Tenn., 578, 584 , 8 L. R. … Parkes v. Clift, supra. In Southern Ry. Co. v.

Roney v. Luttrell

200 Tenn. 403 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1956

certio-rari otherwise in lieu of appeal because the revisory power of the higher court is limited to the correction of errors of tribunals located within the territorial jurisdiction of the appellate body, citing McKee v. … Board of Elections, 173 Tenn. 269 , 117 S.W.2d 752 .

Foster & Creighton Co. v. Graham

154 Tenn. 412 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1926

Ed., 1139 , and Texas Co. v. Brown, 258 U. S., 466 , 42 S. Ct., 375 , 66 L. Ed., 721 . … In Thompson v.

Jenkins v. Loudon County

736 S.W.2d 599 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1987

Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County v. Poe, 215 Tenn. 53, 73 , 383 S.W.2d 265, 274 (1964) (citations omitted). See also Shelby County Civil Service Merit Board v. … See, e.g., Read v. Thomas, 679 S.W.2d 467 (Tenn.App.1984); Rogers v. Anderson, supra; Anderson v. Hayes, supra; McGee v. County of Wilson, 574 S.W.2d 744 (Tenn.App.1978). Cf. Shelby County Civil Service Merit Board v.

Bank v. Penland

101 Tenn. 445 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1898

Bank v. Stockell, 8 Pickle, 256 . … Bearden v. Moses, 7 Lea, 459 .

Taylor v. Continental Tennessee Lines, Inc.

204 Tenn. 556 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1959

Thus in Wattenbarger v. Tullock, 197 Tenn. 279 , 271 S.W.2d 628, 631 , it was held, Mr. Justice Swepston writing the opinion: “It is settled by the case of State ex rel. McMorrow v. … In the case of Conners v.

State of Tennessee v. Michael Rimmer

Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 16, 2021

State v. Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530, 541 (Tenn. 1992). Finally, the Defendant asserts the death penalty should not be an option in a trial with errors. … State v. Davidson, 121 S.W.3d 600, 614 (Tenn. 2003). Proof of premeditation may be shown by direct or circumstantial evidence. State v. Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530, 541 (Tenn. 1992).

Toncray v. Toncray

2 Shan. Cas. 408 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1877

In the case of Gordon v. … And thus it was held in Raymond v.

Frankfort Distillers Corporation v. Liberto

190 Tenn. 478 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1950

Under similar facts, this Court refused relief in United Artists Corporation v. Board of Censors, Tenn. Sup., 225 S. W. (2d) 550 . … There, the unqualified foreign corporation sought relief against the Board of Censors of the City of Memphis.

Blalock v. State

108 Tenn. 185 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1901

Rogers v. Railway Co., 70 Ga., 717 ; Board v. Dart, 67 Ga., 765 ; Penn P. Co. v. Scheiern, 12 Montana, 122; Houghwont v. Boisanbin, N. J., Eq., 318; Kendall v. Kingsly, 120 Mass., 94 . In Thorne v. … In Rogers v.

Rosenbaum v. Campbell

196 Tenn. 555 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 21, 1954

Burkett v. Burkett, 193 Tenn. 165 , 245 S. W. (2d) 185 . … It seems to us that the appellant would be no more entitled to bail now than he would be if he was in the penitentiary and was applying to the parole board or to the Governor pending his application before that body or the

Ruckhart v. Schubert

224 Tenn. 139 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1970

In Prescott v. … This identical situation was presented in Prescott v. Duncan, supra, where the same duties were transferred to a board of commissioners, with a few minor additions.

Mayes v. Fidelity

672 S.W.2d 773 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1984

The Plaintiff is chairman of the board, president and sole stockholder of his construction company, Mayes and Associates, Inc. … Jose v. Equifax, Inc., supra, at 84; See also Clevenger v. Plexco, Div. of Amstead Industries, 614 S.W.2d 356, 360 (Tenn.1981).

Ward v. State

102 Tenn. 724 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1899

This is clearly a case falling within the rule announced in Ker v. Illinois, rather than that enforced in United States v. Rausch, 119 U. S., 407 . … Woods v. State, 15 Pickle, 186 ; Spence v. State, 15 Lea, 539 . Holden fell within the rule which disqualifies, and the trial Judge was in error in forcing the prisoner to challenge him peremptorily.

Stinson v. Daniel

220 Tenn. 70 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1967

Auto Co. v. Ely, supra; Consolidated Coach Company v. … Brown v. Barber, 26 Tenn.App. 534 , 174 S.W.2d 298 (1943). Unless plaintiff’s contributory negligence appears from Ms proof, the burden of showing its existence rests on the defendant. Taylor v.

Schilling v. Darmody

102 Tenn. 439 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 8, 1899

Schilling was then keeping- a boarding house in Memphis, and defendant *441 and his’ family were boarding with her. Afterward they intermarried. … Joiner v. Franklin, 12 Lea, 422 ; Cox v.

State v. L.W.

350 S.W.3d 911 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 17, 2011

Co. v. State, 33 S.W.3d 727, 729 (Tenn.2000). … See Studdard v.

State v. Chilhowee Woolen Mills Co.

115 Tenn. 266 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1905

In the case of Treadwell v. … To the same effect, see Trisconi v. Winship, 43 La. Ann., 45 , 9 South., 29 , 26 Am. St. Rep., 175 , and Slee v. Bloom, 19 Johns., 456 , 10 Am. Dec., 273 .