Case law

King v. Sullivan County

128 Tenn. 393 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1913

R. v. County Court of Davidson County, 1 Sneed, 637 [ 62 Am. Dec., 424 ]; Nichol v. Nashville, 9 Humph., 268 ; Adams v. M. & L. R. O. Co., 2 Cold., 656 ; McCallie v. Chattanooga, 3 Head, 322 ; Shelby County v. … A., 717]; Edmondson v. Board of Education, 108 Tenn., 558 [ 69 S. W., 274 , 58 L. R. A., 170.]

Lennon Company v. Ridge

219 Tenn. 623 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1967

In Sichterman v. … This language seems difficult to reconcile with the “positional risk” concept utilized in the case of O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., supra. Likewise, in the case of Armstrong v.

Craig v. State

50 Tenn. 227 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1871

A question very similar to this, was determined by this court in Armstrong v. The State, 1 Cold., 338 . … We express no opinion as to whether, upon the facts, the case is within the principles announced in Simpson v.

Coal Co. v. Land Co.

106 Tenn. 41 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1900

In Barry v. Railroad, 34 Fed. … In Barry v.

State v. Caughron

855 S.W.2d 526 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 10, 1993

Arterburn v. State, 216 Tenn. 240 , 391 S.W.2d 648, 655 (1965); State v. Taylor, 645 S.W.2d 759, 762 (Tenn.Crim.App.1982). Dr. Blake was a board certified forensic pathologist in practice in that field since 1963. … QUALIFICATIONS OF TWO JURORS The record shows that juror Jerry McGill was related to State’s witness John Brown by marriage.

Memphis Consolidated Gas & Electric Co. v. Speers

113 Tenn. 83 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1904

his order; that the wires were his property and under his exclusive control; that under an ordinance of the city of Memphis it made a connection with these wires only after an inspection of them by the electrician and the board … Co. v. Denver Gas & Electric Co., 63 Pac., 949 .

Smith v. ASARCO Inc.

627 S.W.2d 946 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1982

See Consolidated Coal Co. v. Brown, 225 Tenn. 572 , 474 S.W.2d 416 (1971); Tennessee Products & Chem. Corp. v. Reeves, 220 Tenn. 148 , 415 S.W.2d 118 (1967); A. C. Lawrence Leather Co. v. … Britt, 220 Tenn. 444 , 414 S.W.2d 830 , 418 S.W.2d 660 (1967); Adams v. American Zinc Co., 205 Tenn. 189 , 326 S.W.2d 425 (1959).

Tedder v. Odom

49 Tenn. 68 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1870

That such a contract was not illegal on the part of the defendant, was decided by this Court at its recent term, in the case of Naff v. Crawford, 1 Heiskell’s R., 116. … But the mere fact that the person to whom the board or lodging or any articles are furnished, is a prostitute, does not invalidate the contract therefor, unless the very object of the agreement be to pander to her prostitution

Pierce v. Lawrence

84 Tenn. 572 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1886

And see Brown v. Bigley, 3 Tenn. Ch., 618. … Cas., 609; Simpson v. Jones, 2 Sneed, 36 ; Boles v. Smith. 5 Sneed, 105 ; Haynes v. Gates, 2 Head, 598 ; Campbell v. Hall, 16 N. Y., 575 ; Montgomery v. Rich, 3 Tenn. Ch., 660.

Castleman Construction Company v. Pennington

222 Tenn. 82 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1968

“In [Fecheimer-Keifer] v. … United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v.

Cantor v. Grievance Committees of Washington County

189 Tenn. 536 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1949

W. 417 ], “In searching our decisions for some clue to the attitude of the appellate Courts on the nature or scope of a decree of disbarment it has been noted that in State Board [of Law Examiners] v. … “In Ingle v. Kivett, [30 Tenn. App.1], 201 S.

Memphis Gayoso Gas Co. v. Williamson

56 Tenn. 314 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1872

Reynolds v. … In the case of Whirley v.

Zack Cheek Builders, Inc. v. McLeod

597 S.W.2d 888 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1980

A succinct statement of this rule appears in Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. … See also Saalfrank v. O’Daniel, 533 F.2d 325, 330 (6th Cir. 1976).

Seaton v. Seaton

516 S.W.2d 91 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1974

An examination of the record reveals that the wife, appellee here, filed her petition for separate maintenance or bed and board divorce on July 13, 1973. … See Thompson v. Thompson, 40 Tenn. 527 (1859); Carden v. Carden, 37 S.W. 1022 (Tenn.Ch.App.1896); Wagner v. Wagner, 8 Tenn.C.C.A. (Higgins) 254 (1917).

Garner v. State

73 Tenn. 213 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1880

Thompson v. Anderson, 1 Leg. Rep., 44 . And see Monteeth v. Caldwell, 7 Hum., 13 . … There was a patch of brown paper across its back. Defendant paid witness for the warrant- and took it back.

State Ex Rel. McCormack v. American Building & Loan Ass'n

177 Tenn. 385 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 3, 1941

In Post v. … after March' 31, 1936, and all future dues payments as made until instructed otherwise by the Board.”

Shelby County v. King

620 S.W.2d 493 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1981

State v. Brown, 171 Tenn. 612 , 106 S.W.2d 861 (1937). … In the United States v.

Scales v. Kelley

70 Tenn. 706 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1879

The account sued on was for the board of one Egan and the hands employed by him in working on the line of a railroad. … Bean v. Quimby, 5 N. H., 94. And it is universally construed to embrace communications, of or to a person who acts as agent between attorney and client. 1 Dan. Ch. Pr., 576.

Robert Crotty v. Mark Flora, M.D.

Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 29, 2023

For example, in Brown v. Wal-Mart Disc. Cities, the plaintiff was injured by slipping in spilled water and ice while in a store owned by defendant Wal-Mart. 12 S.W.3d 785, 786 (Tenn. 2000). … Brown, 12 S.W.3d at 787–88.

Nolan v. Gardner

54 Tenn. 215 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1872

In the ease of Prince v. Hazelton, 20 Johns. … Browning, in the Supreme Court of Georgia, 22 Georgia It., the testator being mortally wounded, made a nuncupative will, and died some twelve hours after.