Case law

Graphic Systems, Inc. v. Taylor

791 S.W.2d 27 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 21, 1990

Marchica v. State Board of Equalization, 107 Cal.App.2d 501 , 237 P.2d 725 (1951) involved a California Civil Fraud penalty similar to Tennessee’s. … The record at trial also shows that both company’s officers were extremely cooperative and above board with the State auditors and investigators.

Jenkins v. Loudon County

736 S.W.2d 603 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1987

Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County v. Poe, 215 Tenn. 53, 73 , 383 S.W.2d 265 , 274 (1964) (citations omitted). See also Shelby County Civil Service Merit Board v. … Shelby County Civil Service Merit Board v.

Clark v. Memphis Street Railway Co.

123 Tenn. 232 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1910

There does not, however, seem to have been any change in the personnel of the board. … In Thompson v.

McClain v. Henry I. Siegel Co.

834 S.W.2d 295 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1992

date that the judgment or decree is entered at an annual rate of interest five (5) *296 percentage points above the average prime loan rate for the most recent week for which such an average rate has been published by the board … See, e.g., Fowler v.

Andrew Campbell v. John M'iver

5 Tenn. 60 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 6, 1817

Brown, sheriff.” … Williams, 10 Yer. 234 ; Conrad v. Darden, 4 Yer. 307 . See McCarrol v. Weeks, 5 Hay. 246 ; King’s Digest, 397, 3339, 3949, 3950, 11,535, 11,538, 11,539.

State v. Stamper

863 S.W.2d 404 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1993

In United States v. … Furthermore, in Nix v.

State v. Hart

106 Tenn. 269 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1901

Burkhalter, v. Banks at al., and 'the' two cases were heard to- *270 getlier. We are of opinion they do not involve the same questions, though each case is somewhat-dependent on the other. … Here we have the unanimous action of the entire board — one, Walton, being without question do jure a director,, and the other two, Banks and Andrews, do facto *272 officers, in. a mater involving the rights of a third person

State ex rel. Newsom v. Henderson

221 Tenn. 24 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1968

Folds v. Hunt, 216 Tenn. 195, 202 , 391 S.W.2d 629, 632 , quoting with approval from Riddle v. … Underwood v. Brown, 193 Tenn. 113 , 244 S.W.2d 168 , where it is said that the purpose of habeas corpus is to strike down a judgment where it is void and not merely a voidable judgment.

Seeber v. Watlington

192 Tenn. 521 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1951

Seeber, in his official capacity as County Judge for Anderson County, Tennessee, against the defendants as members of the Anderson County Board of Commissioners of Elections. … This Court in State v. True, 116 Tenn. 294 , 95 S.

Western Pipe Line Constructors, Inc. v. Dickinson

203 Tenn. 248 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1958

Commonwealth v. Work Co., 301 Pa. 150 , 151 A. 786 ; Morrison-Knudson Co., Inc. v. State Board of Equalization, 58 Wyo. 500 , 135 P.2d 927 . … Commonwealth *256 v. Wark Co., supra; Morrison-Knudson Co., Inc., v. State Board of Equalization, supra; In re Kingston Realty Co. 2 Cir., 160 F. 445 ; Morley v. E. E.

State v. Simmons

199 Tenn. 479 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1956

Lea v. Brown, 166 Tenn. 669, 692, 693 , 64 S. W. (2d) 841, 848 , 91 A. L. R. 1246, is appropriate: • “A-party- may waive any provision of a contract-statute, or constitution intendéd for his benefit. … Lea v. Brown, supra., ... .. The trial judge’s second grqund for holding the Act invalid was that the Act “was not the law of the.land” within the meaning of the Constitution.

Maples v. State

50 Tenn. 408 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1872

Beatty went to the magistrate’s office, where,” he says, “he found the prisoner under arrest, as well as Dick Brown, another negro implicated in the poisoning. … A remark of tbe court in the case of State v. Fields, Peck R., p. 143, is relied on to sustain this objection.

State ex rel. Inman v. Quarterly County Court of Cocke County

209 Tenn. 153 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1961

On the strength of this action the County Board of Education let contracts for the school construction committing $266,856.00 of the September 7th bond sale. … Hanover v. Boyd, 173 Tenn. 426 , 121 S.W.2d 120 ; Seaver v. Shaver, 206 Tenn. 39 , 331 S.W.2d 288 .

Shockley v. Morristown Produce & Ice Co.

158 Tenn. 148 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1928

Chemical Co. v. … White v. Bates, 234 Ill., 276 ; Hendricks v. Calloway, 211 Mo. 536 .

State of Tennessee v. Peter Allen Ross - Dissenting

Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 9, 2001

The distinction between a disclaimer and an abandonment of proprietary interest was elucidated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in United States v. Brown, 64 F.3d 1083 (7th Cir. 1995). … The principle explained in Brown applies with even greater force to the case under submission.

North American Capital Corporation v. McCants

510 S.W.2d 901 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1974

Appellees desired to open a federal savings and loan association which required a charter from the Federal Home Loan Bank Board. … Justice Traynor in Lloyd v.

Sherrill v. Souder

325 S.W.3d 584 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 28, 2010

In Teeters v. … Because it was undisputed that the Board meeting Roe attended provided her with information that was sufficient, as a matter of law, to put her on notice, her complaint was untimely. In Stanbury v.

Wright v. Jackson Construction Co.

138 Tenn. 145 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1917

Crisman v. McMurray, 107 Tenn., 469 , 64 S. W., 711 ; Connor v. Frierson, *150 98 Tenn., 183 , 38 S. W., 1031 ; McElya v. Hill, 105 Tenn., 319 , 59 S. W., 1025 . The case of Madison Trust Co. v. … Brown, 132 Tenn., 294 , 177 S. W., 1158 , L. R. A., 1915F, 723, Ann.

Moneypenny v. Third Nat. Bank

172 Tenn. 237 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1937

In the opinion in New York Life Insurance Co. v. Bank (Shelby Equity), 172 Tenn., 226 , 111 S. … Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bank, 127 Tenn., 720 , 157 S. W., 414 ; Ford v. H. C. Brown & Co., 114 Tenn., 467 , 88 S. W., 1036 , 1 L. R. A. (N. S.), 188; Freeman v. Bank, 167 Tenn., 399 , 70 S. W. (2d), 25 ; Barry v.

Tennessee Cent. Ry. Co. v. Pharr

183 Tenn. 658 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 13, 1946

and commissions, for the reason that it was suspended by Section 10618, as held by us in Woodroof v. … State v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 330 Mo. 729 , 51 S. W. (2d) 73, 76 ; Board of Levee Com’rs v. Johnson, 178 Ky. 287 , 199 S. W. 8, 12 , L. R. A. 1918E, 202.