Case law

Howell v. Thompson

95 Tenn. 396 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1895

Greene v. Starnes, 1 Heis., 582; Saylors v. Saylors, 3 Heis., 533; O’Neal v. Smith, 10 Lea, 340 ; McBee v. Bearden, 7 Lea, 733 ; Howell v. Cobb, 2 Cold., 104 ; Armstrong v. Croft, 3 Lea, 191 ; Spencer v. … Marshall v. Hudson, 9 Yer., 57 ; Maxey v. Carter, 10 Yer., 521 ; Cocke v. Hoffman, 5 Lea, 109 ; Reeves v. Pulliam, 7 Bax., 120 ; Jamison v. Lillard, 12 Lea, 690 ; Gibson v. Jones, 13 Lea, 684 ; Glass v.

Fleming v. City of Memphis

126 Tenn. 331 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1912

Memphis v. Lasser, 9 Humph., 757 ; Nashville v. Brown, 9 Heisk., 1 , 24 Am. Rep., 289 ; Niblett v. Nashville, 12 Heisk., 684 , 27 Am. Rep., 755 . In Knoxville v. … Even in Williams v.

Tennessee Cent. Ry. Co. v. Pharr

183 Tenn. 658 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 13, 1946

and commissions, for the reason that it was suspended by Section 10618, as held by us in Woodroof v. … State v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 330 Mo. 729 , 51 S. W. (2d) 73, 76 ; Board of Levee Com’rs v. Johnson, 178 Ky. 287 , 199 S. W. 8, 12 , L. R. A. 1918E, 202.

Barnum v. Le Master

110 Tenn. 638 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1903

In Templeton v. Brown, 86 Tenn., 55 , 5 S. … Nelson v. Trigg, 2 Tenn. Cas., 645 ; Spurlock v. Brown, 91 Tenn., 241, 257 , 18 S. W., 868 .

Keen v. Allison

166 Tenn. 218 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 20, 1933

Mitchell v. Usilton, 146 Tenn., 419 ; City of Nashville v. Latham, 160 Tenn., 581 ; American Mutual Liability Co. v. Otis Elevator Co., 160 Tenn., 248 ; McCreary v. Nashville C. & St. L. Ry., 161 Tenn., 691 ; Revell v. … I.), 146 Atl., 484 , and Kelly v. North British R. Co. (1915), 53 Scot. L. R., 53, As observed in American Mutual Liability Co. v.

Rodgers v. Rodgers

53 Tenn. 489 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1871

Brown, 7 John. C. R., 222. … Jarman, vol. 1, p. 160, and approved by this court in Brown v.

Sweeton v. Tennessee Consol. Coal Co.

179 Tenn. 216 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1942

Kinnard v. Tennessee Chem. Co., 157 Tenn., 206 , 7 S. W. (2d), 807 . Actual dependency for support is the test. See Wilmoth v. Phoenix Utility Co., 168 Tenn., 95, 97 , 75 S. W. (2d), 48 . … What this young man had heretofore contributed had been little, if anything, more than his reasonable board and other expenses.

Day v. Sharp

128 Tenn. 340 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1913

It was held in Lewis v. … State v. Rose, supra; United States v. Hartwell, 6 Wall., 385, 393 , 18 L. Ed, 830, 832; People v. Duane, 121 N. Y., 367, 375 , 24 N. E., 845 .

Perkins v. Perkins

56 Tenn. 95 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1871

Brown & Walker and Campbell & McEwen. The complainant brings the case up by writ of error. … solicitors of the several parties are entitled to a lien upon the recovery of their «clients for reasonable fees, and this lien has been held to attach to real estate, where it is the subject matter of litigation: See Hunt v.

McClain v. Henry I. Siegel Co.

834 S.W.2d 295 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1992

date that the judgment or decree is entered at an annual rate of interest five (5) *296 percentage points above the average prime loan rate for the most recent week for which such an average rate has been published by the board … See, e.g., Fowler v.

Washington v. Robertson County

29 S.W.3d 466 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 2, 2000

In Carr v. … The Supreme Court has recently reaffirmed this holding in Board of County Comm’r v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

Ford v. State

184 Tenn. 443 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1945

Proof of a particular threat is made to his' wife that he would kill her if she “turned him up” to the Draft Board, and it is shown that she nevertheless did report to the Board that he was not supporting her or the children … Hays v. State, 159 Tenn. 388 , 19 S. W. (2d) 313 ; Williams v. State, 164 Tenn. 562 , at page 570, 51 S. W. (2d) 482 ; Rowe v. State, 164 Tenn. 571 , at page 579, 51 S. W. (2d) 505 ; Hutchins v.

Smith v. Nashville

7 L.R.A. 469 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1890

Town of West Hartford v. The Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Hartford, 44 Conn., 361 . … The strongest adverse case is that of City of Louisville v. Commonwealth, 1 Duvall, 295.

Keyt v. Keyt

244 S.W.3d 321 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 19, 2007

Flannary, 121 S.W.3d at 650 ; Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 166 (Tenn.Ct.App.1994). … McFarland v. McFarland, No. M2005-01260-COA-R3-CV, 2007 WL 2254576 , at *6 (Tenn.Ct.App. Aug.6, 2007). First, the contributions must be “real and significant.” Id.; Brown, 913 S.W.2d at 167 .

Weakley v. Barrow

137 Tenn. 224 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1916

Johns v. Montgomery, 265 Ill., 21 , 106 N. E., 497 , L. R. A., 1916B, 1073, Ann. Cas., 1916A, 996, following Curtiss v. Brown, 29 Ill., 201 ; Lenow v. Arrington, 111 Tenn., 720 , 69 S. W., 314 ; Ricardi v. … In Burroughs v.

Seeber v. Watlington

192 Tenn. 521 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1951

Seeber, in his official capacity as County Judge for Anderson County, Tennessee, against the defendants as members of the Anderson County Board of Commissioners of Elections. … This Court in State v. True, 116 Tenn. 294 , 95 S.

State Ex Rel. Gillard v. Cook

528 S.W.2d 545 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1975

Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972) and Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778 , 93 S.Ct. 1756 , 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973). … Therefore, Petitioner strongly argues that the holding of Mempa v.

Oliver v. Nashville

106 Tenn. 273 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1901

State v. Barksdale, 5 Hum., *278 154 ; Nashville v. Brown, 9 Heis., 2; Niblett v. Nashville, 12 Heis., 684; Poole v. … Jones v. Telephone Co., 17 Pick., 443 .

Shockley v. Morristown Produce & Ice Co.

158 Tenn. 148 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1928

Chemical Co. v. … White v. Bates, 234 Ill., 276 ; Hendricks v. Calloway, 211 Mo. 536 .

State v. Simmons

199 Tenn. 479 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1956

Lea v. Brown, 166 Tenn. 669, 692, 693 , 64 S. W. (2d) 841, 848 , 91 A. L. R. 1246, is appropriate: • “A-party- may waive any provision of a contract-statute, or constitution intendéd for his benefit. … Lea v. Brown, supra., ... .. The trial judge’s second grqund for holding the Act invalid was that the Act “was not the law of the.land” within the meaning of the Constitution.