Case law

Mitchell v. W. L. Stewart & Bro.

57 Tenn. 18 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1872

See Yancey v. Brown & Appleton, 3 Sneed.0 Reverse the judgment and remand the cause for a new trial.

Hannum v. State

90 Tenn. 647 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1891

In the case of Turner v. … This Court has decided that it will not reverse upon defendant’s unsupported affidavit (Brown v. State, 85 Tenn., 439 ), and there was uo error for refusing a new trial on this ground.

Kidd v. McCanless

200 Tenn. 273 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1956

The citation of Smiley v. … See State v.

East Tennessee Coal Co. v. Taylor

131 Tenn. 11 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1914

Wooldridge v. Bank, 1 Sneed (33 Tenn.), 298; Williams v. Neil, 4 Heisk. (51 Tenn.), 282; Hughes v. Brown, 4 Pick. (88 Tenn.), 578, 13 S. W., 286 , 8 L. R. A., 480; Realty Co. v. … Williams v. Otey, supra. Certainly third parties could not complain.

Hanover v. Ruch

809 S.W.2d 893 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1991

Powell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 217 Tenn. 503 , 398 S.W.2d 727, 732 (1966). “Where the reason fails the rule should not apply.” Brown v. Selby, 206 Tenn. 71 , 332 S.W.2d 166, 169 (1960). … U.S., 757 S.W.2d 687, 711 (Tex.1988); Vt.Stat.Ann. tit. 15, Sec. 1001 (Supp.1984); Va.Code Sec. 8.01-220 (1984); Lund v. Caple, 675 P.2d 226 , 100 Wash.2d 739 (1984); Brown v.

State v. Taylor

993 S.W.2d 33 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1999

State v. Barnard, 899 S.W.2d 617, 622 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994). … State v.

Staggs v. State

210 Tenn. 175 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 4, 1962

In the case of Turner v. … Sm ith v. State, 90 Tenn. 575 , 18 S.W. 248 ; King v. State, 91 Tenn. 617 , 20 S.W. 169 ; Morgan v. Duffey, *183 94 Tenn. 686 , 30 S.W. 735 ; Ferguson v. Moore, 98 Tenn. 342 , 39 S.W. 341 .’ Sherman v.

Read v. Watkins

79 Tenn. 158 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1883

Iir the case of Smith, Trustee, v. … But in Brown v.

Bank v. Bowdre Bros.

92 Tenn. 723 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1893

McCampbell v. Thornburg, 3 Head, 109 ; Shirley v. Keathy, 4 Cold., 29 ; West v. Walker, 2 Swan, 32 ; Hackett v. Brown, 2 Heis., 264. In Hackett v. … In the case of Sheehan et al. v.

Sherman v. State

125 Tenn. 19 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1911

Brown v. State, 85 Tenn., 439 ; Hannum v. State, 90 Tenn., 653 . … In the case of Odle v. State, 6 Bax., 159 , the jury was taken to board at a small two-room house, at which place the prosecutor and his two daughters also came to board.

Newport Cotton Mill Co. v. Mims

103 Tenn. 465 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 11, 1899

In the Chicago City Railway Company v. … Wondner v. Sharp, 4 C. B., 404; New H. Cent. R. R. Co. v. Johnson, 30 N. H., 390; Livesey v. Omaha Hotel Co., 5 Neb., 56 ; Oldtown & L. R. R. Co. v. Veazie, 39 Me., 571.

Kendricks. v. Dallum

1 Tenn. 489 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1812

See the case of Taylor and Quarles v. Brown, S. C. U. S. February, 1812; MSS. 3 Binn. 120 ; Hardin, 193. 3 1 Fonb. … B. 1, c. 6, § 9; Francis's Maxims, 13th Maxim; 2 Dall. 428 ; 4 Dall. 210 , 218; 2 Day, 166 ; Taylor and Quarles v. Brown, Sup. Ct. U. S. 1812, MSS., Campbell's Lessee v. Erwin, Fed. Court, West Ten. 4 Vide Taylor v.

Chamberlain v. Aetna Life & Casualty Insurance Co.

593 S.W.2d 661 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1980

State v. Henderson, 220 Tenn. 701 , 423 S.W.2d 489 (1968); Nance v. State, 210 Tenn. 328 , 358 S.W.2d 327 (1962). … Exempting a witness from a general rule of exclusion probably came into our law as a result of the opinion of this Court in Wisener & Brown v. Maupin, 61 Tenn. 342 (1872).

State v. Elliston

63 Tenn. 99 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874

The case of Dickson, et als. v. … The case of Franklin v.

Hawkins v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.

742 S.W.2d 253 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1987

Brown Shoe Co. v. Reed, 209 Tenn. 106 , 350 S.W.2d 65 (1961); *255 Reed v. Genesco, Inc., Tenn., 512 S.W.2d 1 (1974). … Div. v. Cannon, Tenn., 523 S.W.2d 360, 361 (1975); Imperial Shirt Corp. v. Jenkins, 217 Tenn. 602 , 399 S.W.2d 757 (1966); Murray Ohio Manufacturing Company v. Vines, Tenn., 498 S.W.2d 897 (1973); Norton Co. v.

Pritchitt v. Nashville Trust Co.

96 Tenn. 472 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1896

. *482 In Bouch v. … Practically the same rule as that announced in Minot v. Paine, supra, seems to prevail in Maine (Richardson v. Richardson, 75 Me., 570; S. C., 46 Am. R., 430), in Rhode Island (Petition of Brown & Larned, 14 R.

Memphis Bank and Trust Co. v. Garner

624 S.W.2d 551 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1981

The decision of the Chancellor was rendered before release of the opinion of this Court in Commerce Union Bank of Chattanooga v. State Board of Equalization, 615 S.W.2d 151 (Tenn.1981). … In American Bemberg Corp. v.

Venable v. Curd

39 Tenn. 582 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1859

Taylor v. Skaine, 2 South Ca. Rep., 696; People v. Collins, 7 Johns. Rep., 549; McInstry v. Tanner, 9 Johns. Rep., 135. The same rule is laid down by this Court in Pearce v. Hawkins, 2 Swan, 87 . … We have been referred by the counsel of the plaintiffs in error, to Gregg v. Cooke, Peck’s Rep., 82, and Brown v. Newby, 6 Yer., 395 . But it is manifest that in these cases, as also in Smith v.

Jenkins v. Loudon County

736 S.W.2d 603 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1987

Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County v. Poe, 215 Tenn. 53, 73 , 383 S.W.2d 265 , 274 (1964) (citations omitted). See also Shelby County Civil Service Merit Board v. … Shelby County Civil Service Merit Board v.

Kernodle v. Peerless Life Insurance

213 Tenn. 631 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 8, 1964

See Bryan v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 174 Tenn. 602 , 130 S.W.2d 85 (1939), and Maddux v. National Life & Accident Ins. Co., 36 Tenn. App. 275, 277-278 , 254 S.W.2d 433 (1952). … Co. v.