Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,256 results
1.55s
106 Tenn. 384 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1901
State v. Schlitz Brewing Co., 20 Pick., 720 ; State v. Brown, 19 Pick., 455 ; Story’s Cons. Lim., side page 144; State v. Yardly, 11 Pick., 546 ; Cannon v. Mathes, 8 Heis., 519; Garvin v. State, 13 Lea, 166 . … We think' the case falls within the rule laid down in State v. Yardly, 11 Pick., 546 , and State v. Brewing Co., 20 Pick., 720 , and that the reasoning and holding in those causes is applicable and controlling in this.
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited Services Automobile Ass'n v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
222 Tenn. 168 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1968
Brown v. Tenn.
Cited 2 timesPublishedIn re Forked Deer Drainage District
133 Tenn. 684 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1915
Smith v. Carter, 131 Tenn., 1 , 173 S. W., 430 , and cases therein cited. The case of Smith v. … Snell authority may be lodged in any board or tribunal which the legislature may designate.” Hagar v. Reclamation District, 111 U. S., 701 , 4 Sup. Ct., 663, 28 L. Ed., 569 ; Reclamation District v.
Cited 7 timesPublished134 Tenn. 599 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1915
Diamond v. State, 123 Tenn., 348, 362 , 131 S. W., 666 ; Brinkley v. State, 125 Tenn., 371, 385 , 143 S. W., 1120 ; Noe v. Mayor and Alderman, 128 Tenn., 350, 362 , 161 S. W., 485 , Ann. … By treating the presumption as conclusive the board of equalizers in effect deprived plaintiffs in error of their day in court.
Cited 0 timesPublished50 Tenn. 278 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1871
The presentment is a copy of one in the ease of the State v. Benthal, 5 Hum., 519 , which was sustained by the court as sufficient. … One of the witnesses, John Hyde, describes the affray as follows: “That he saw James Lemons coming through Everett’s field with Ben Owens, Emerson "Wilson and James Brown, in pursuit of him; they were all throwing rocks;
Cited 1 timesPublishedTagg v. Tennessee National Bank
56 Tenn. 479 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1872
If he have such knowledge he is bound to communicate it to the Board.” … Agricultural Bank v. Robinson, 24 Maine, 276; Lime Rock Bank v. Hewitt, 50 Maine, 269.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTagg v. Tennessee National Bank
56 Tenn. 479 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1872
If he have such knowledge he is bound to communicate it to the Board.” … Agricultural Bank v. Robinson, 24 Maine, 276; Lime Rock Bank v. Hewitt, 50 Maine, 269.
Cited 0 timesPublished145 Tenn. 361 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1920
Quinn v. … Heiskell v. Knoxville, 136 Tenn., 376 , 189 S. W., 857 ; Luehrman v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedMillican v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
224 Tenn. 604 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1970
*608 Petitioners, citing United States Casualty Company v. … In Smith v. Van Noy Interstate Co., et al. (1923), 150 Tenn. 25 , 262 S.W. 1048 ; Tidwell v. Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Co. (1931), 163 Tenn. 420 , 43 S.W.2d 221 ; and Vantrease v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedMurray v. State ex rel. Luallen
115 Tenn. 303 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1905
While it may be true the precise question here presented has not been determined in this State, yet we think the' principle announced in State, ex rel., v. Grace, 113 Tenn., 9 , 82 S. W., 485 , is controlling. … In Johnson v. Brice, 112 Tenn., 59 , 83 S.
Cited 11 timesPublishedState ex rel. Loser v. National Optical Stores Co.
189 Tenn. 433 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1949
Notlow v. State, 125 Tenn. 547, 590 , *447 145 S. W. 177 , 188, L.R.A. 1916F, 177 ; Campbell v. McIntyre, 165 Tenn. 47 , 52 S. W. 2d 162 ; State Board of Examiners for Architects and Engineers v. … Defendant’s next proposition is that by a decree of the Chancery Court of Davidson County, in the case of State Board of Optometry v.
Cited 38 timesPublished96 Tenn. 163 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1896
In Godley v. Hogarty, 20 Pa., 387 , approved in Carson v. … In Waggoner v.
Cited 26 timesPublishedHenderson v. State Ex Rel. Lance
220 Tenn. 520 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1967
Machibroda v. United States, 368 U.S. 487 , 82 S.Ct. 510 , 7 L.Ed.2d 473 ; and Olive v. United States, 6 Cir., 327 F.2d 646 , certiorari denied 377 U.S. 971 , 84 S.Ct. 1653 , 12 L.Ed.2d 740 . *524 Scott v. … The trial judge relied upon our case of Swang v.
Overruled on other grounds by Summers v. State, 2007 Tenn. LEXIS 15 (2007)Cited 30 timesPublished56 Tenn. 475 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1872
At this time Otten was dismissed by the Board. … The same rule is recognized in Snell v. McGavock, 1 Swan, 208 , and upon this question we believe the authorities are uniform. See Young v. Hare, 11 Hum., 308 .
Cited 0 timesPublished56 Tenn. 475 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1872
At this time Otten was dismissed by the Board. … The same rule is recognized in Snell v. McGavock, 1 Swan, 208 , and upon this question we believe the authorities are uniform. See Young v. Hare, 11 Hum., 308 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedHourly Compensation Rate of Court Appointed Counsel v. Mathews
937 S.W.2d 842 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1996
In McCallen v. … Owens v. State, 908 S.W.2d 923, 926 (Tenn.1995); Roseman v. Roseman, 890 S.W.2d 27, 29 (Tenn.1994); Belle-Aire Village, Inc. v. Ghorley, 574 S.W.2d 723, 726 (Tenn.1978).
Cited 28 timesPublishedWilkins v. Chicago. St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad
110 Tenn. 422 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1903
Watson, 10 Yerg., 368 ; and Smith v. McCall’s Heirs, 2 Humph., 163 -166. And as said by Mr. Justice Brown of the supreme court of the United States, in a celebrated case (Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co., 158 U. … Dec., 339 ; Newark Aqueduct Board v. Passaic, 45 N. J. Eq., 393, 18 Ath, 106; Georgetown v. Alexandria Canal Co., 12 Pet., 91 , 9 L.
Cited 16 timesPublishedService Merchandise Co. v. Tidwell
529 S.W.2d 215 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1975
Creative Merchandising had the catalogues and supplements printed by either the Midwest Printing Company or Brown Printing Company, both Minnesota corporations. … Coal Co. v. Bates, 156 U.S. 577 , 15 S.Ct. 415 , 39 L.Ed. 538 (1895); Brown v. Houston, 114 U.S. 622 , 5 S.Ct. 1091 , 29 L.Ed. 257 (1885).
Cited 8 timesPublished99 Tenn. 500 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 9, 1897
Trafford v. Adams Express Co., 8 Lea, 96 ; Railroad Co. v. Smith, 9 Lea, 470 ; Railroad v. Toppins, 10 Lea, 58 ; Fowlkes v. N. & D. R. R. Co., 9 Heis., 829; Railroad v. Gurley, 12 Lea, 53 ; Railroad v. … Co. v.
Cited 13 timesPublished166 Tenn. 476 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1933
Railroad v. Byrne, 119 Tenn., 278 , Coke & Coal Co. v. Steel Co., 123 Tenn., 428 ; Scott v. Nashville Bridge Co., 143 Tenn., 86 ; Cannon v. Mathis, 55 Tenn., 504 . … State v. Yardley, 95 Tenn., 553 ; Railroad v. Byrne, supra; Couch v. State, 140 Tenn., 157 ; Hunter v.
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna