Case law

State ex rel. Chitwood v. Murley

202 Tenn. 637 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1957

This case is appealed merely as a test case for the four Board members. … Maloney v.

Marshall v. Burke

158 Tenn. 133 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1928

members of the board to be selected from two of the predominant political parties. … In State ex rel. v.

White v. German National Bank

56 Tenn. 475 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1872

At this time Otten was dismissed by the Board. … The same rule is recognized in Snell v. McGavock, 1 Swan, 208 , and upon this question we believe the authorities are uniform. See Young v. Hare, 11 Hum., 308 .

Beasley v. Cunningham

171 Tenn. 334 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1937

board of commissioners.” … In State v. Wm.

Howe Realty Co. v. City of Nashville

176 Tenn. 405 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1940

The Board shall adopt such rules and regulations as it may deem necessary to carry into effect the provisions of this ordinance. … Publicity Leasing Co. v. Ludwig, 218 N.Y. 540 , 113 N.E. 532 ; Wheat v. Barrett, 210 Cal. 193 , 290 P. 1033 ; Kingshighway Presbyterian Church v. Sun Realty Co., 324 Mo. 510 , 24 S.W.2d 108 ; Geneva Investment Co. v.

Taylor v. Tennessee State Democratic Executive Committee

574 S.W.2d 716 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1978

Elections § 148, p. 421; Heiskell v. Ledgerwood, 144 Tenn. 666 , 234 S.W. 1001 (1921). There is no such statute in this state. … It does hold that, under existing Tennessee statutes, the complainant’s redress, if any, rests with the State Democratic Primary Board rather than the Chancery Court.

Beaver v. Hall

142 Tenn. 416 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1919

Plaugher applied to, and received from, this board a license to sell liquors at his saloon in the city of Camden. … And in the note to Howard v. Burke, 140 Am. St. Rep., 186 , the editor, in referring to the cases of Lang v. Bayonne and Norton v.

Whitley v. Hix

207 Tenn. 683 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1961

In Sandlin v. … Casenburg v.

New Rivieria Arts Theatre v. State Ex Rel. Davis

219 Tenn. 652 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1967

Kingsley Books, Inc., v. Brown, 354 U.S. 436 , 77 S.Ct. 1325 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1469 (1957). … Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown, supra.

Shay v. Harper

202 Tenn. 141 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 3, 1957

Wood v. Hancock, 23 Tenn. 465 . … Co. v.

Foster v. Duggin

695 S.W.2d 526 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 12, 1985

See, e.g., Christy v. Saliterman, 288 Minn. 144 , 179 N.W.2d 288, 307 (1970); Andrews v. Cain, 62 App.Div.2d 612, 406 N.Y.S.2d 168, 169 (1978); Kane, Kane & Kritzer, Inc. v. … See Winter v. Brown, 365 A.2d 381, 386 (D.C.App.1976). The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. Costs are taxed to the defendant, Marshall E. Duggin. FONES, BROCK, HARBISON and DRO-WOTA, JJ., concur.

Greer v. Williford

7 Tenn. 289 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1823

Brown, J. delivered the opinion of the Court. … This upon the authority of the case of Lattig v.

Jacob Walker v. Hugh Dunlop

6 Tenn. 271 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1818

See, as to misrepresentation, Lewis v. McLemore, 10 Yer. 206 ; Donelson v. Weakley, 3 Yer. 178; Phillips v. Hollister, 2 Cold. 269 ; Merriwether v. Larmon, 3 Sneed, 448; Drew v. Clarke, Cooke, 374 ; Sparks v. … Flora, 1 Tenn. 426 ; Brents v. Brown, 3 Head, 560 . See King’s Digest, 2242, 2562-64, 2585-89.

Perry v. City of Elizabethton

160 Tenn. 102 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1929

In Miller v. … In Reams v.

Keese v. Hamilton County

184 Tenn. 171 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1946

However, in University of Tennessee v. Peoples Bank, 157 Tenn. 87 , 6 S. … In McAndrews v. Hamilton County, 105 Tenn. 399 , 58 S.

Steven Kampmeyer v. State of Tennessee

Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 13, 2022

Moreno,479 S.W.3d at 804 (citing Brown v. State, 783 S.W.2d 567, 572(Tenn. Ct. App. 1989)(Koch, J., concurring)). … .§ 9-8-402(a)(5)('Claims not within thejurisdiction ofthe claims comrnission shall be sent to the board of claims.").

Allen v. Dayton Hotel Co.

95 Tenn. 480 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1895

Dispatch Line v. Bellamy Mfg. Co., 37 Am. Dec., 20 ; Edgerly v. Emerson, 55 Am. Dec., 216 ; Sargent v. Webster, 13 Metcalf (Mass.), 497 (S. C., 46 Am. Dec., 746 ). Says Mr. … Blackwell on Tax Titles, 399, 400; Brien v. Marsh, 1 Tenn. Ch., 630; Watson v. Ryan, 3 Tenn. Ch., 46; *490 Boyd v. Allen, 15 Lea, 91 .

Alsup v. Murfreesboro Bread & Ice Cream Co.

165 Tenn. 591 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1933

Kenny v. Railroad Co., 152 N. Y. S., 117. That helps but little. … These facts bring the case within the reasoning and the rule as applied in Southern Surety Co. v. Childers, 25 A. L. R., 373. See also Skouitchi v. Chic Cloak & Suit Co., 15 A. L. R., 1288, Anno., and Linnane v.

Henley v. State

98 Tenn. 665 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 29, 1897

Dom. (2d *724 Ed.), Sec. 9; Miller v. Norton, 152 Mass., 540 ; Tiedeman on Police Power, Sec. 42; Markham v. Brown, 37 Ga., 277 . These are the great reserved powers of the State. 53 Am. St. Rep., 564 . … . & V.), §6454.

UPTAIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. McClain

526 S.W.2d 458 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 18, 1975

Washington County Board of Education et al. v. Hartley, 517 S.W.2d 749 (Tenn.1974); Tom Still Transfer Company v. Way, 482 S.W.2d 775 (1972). … Washington County Board of Education et al. v. Hartley, supra; Floyd v. Tennessee Dickel Company, 225 Tenn. 65 , 463 S.W.2d 684 (1971). As heretofore noted the only witness other than appellee was Dr. Tom K. Young.