Case law

Calloway v. Hopkins

58 Tenn. 349 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1872

This was substantially held in Polk’s lessee v. Wendle, 5 Wheaton, 292; also Polk’s lessee v. Wendle, 9 Cranch, 87 . … If made after the Act of 1783, in Armstrong’s office, it was not necessarily void 'because the land was west of Brown’s line, for entries might have been lawfully made west of Brown’s line; but it would still be subject to

McDonald v. City of Nashville

114 Tenn. 540 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1904

In Preston v. … In Daniel v. Coal Company, 105 Tenn., 470 , 58 S.

West v. Pratt

871 S.W.2d 477 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1994

See e.g., Brown v. … Co. v. Glens Falls Ins.

Employers Re-Insurance Corp. v. Going

161 Tenn. 79 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1930

In Mengle Box Company v. … On pag-e 263 (Spurlock v.

Hullett v. Hullett

162 Tenn. 431 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1931

Ragio v. Collins, 101 Tenn., 662 . … The Superior Court of Pennsylvania has so held in Althouse v. Roth, 35 Pa. Super. Ct., 400. See also Brown, Administrator, v. Dunn, 45 R. I., 63. For the reasons stated, the decree of the chancellor must be affirmed.

Automobile Sales Co. v. Johnson

174 Tenn. 38 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1938

As authority for this insistence, Quinton v. Board of Claims, 165 Tenn., 201 , 54 S. W. (2d), 953 , is cited, wherein, on page 215, 54 S. … Rep., 641 ; Mayrhofer v. Board of Education et al., 89 Cal., 110 , 26 P., 646 , 23 Am. St. Rep., 451 .

Caldwell v. Huffstutter

173 Tenn. 225 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 28, 1938

In Gordon v. … In Wilson v.

East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad v. Stuart

1 Shan. Cas. 376 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1875

See on this subject 1st Ohitty, PL, 672-3; Stephen’s PL, p. 147; Horsely v. Branch, 1 Hum., 199 ; Brown v. Parks, 8 Hum., 294 . Such we think is this case.

Smith v. State Technical Institute at Memphis

682 S.W.2d 915 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1984

State Board of Education Rule 0520-2-3-01(5). … As noted in Potts v.

New York Life Ins. Co. v. Bank of Commerce & Trust Co.

172 Tenn. 226 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1937

In Ford v. Brown & Co., 114 Tenn., 467 , 88 S. W., 1036 , 1038, 1 L. R. A. (N. S.), 188, two certificates of deposit were involved, dealt with, together, one of which read, “C. N. … The opinion cited Ford v. Brown & Co., supra, and our older decisions of Alexander v. Alderson, 66 Tenn. (7 Baxt.), 403; Covington v. Anderson, 84 Tenn. *234 (16 Lea), 310, and Caulkins v.

State Ex Rel. Llewellyn v. Knox County

165 Tenn. 319 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1932

In Davis v. … Co. v. Clinton County Comrs., 1 Ohio St., 88 . In Moers v.

Shackt v. Railroad

94 Tenn. 658 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1895

It was of a dark brown color, and of a kind known as jewelry trunks. … In the case of Keeter v.

In Re Estate of Ina Ruth Brown - Concur

Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 22, 2013

In Rogers v. … Relying primarily upon Junot v.

City of Knoxville v. Ft. Sanders Hospital

148 Tenn. 699 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1923

Cumberland Lodge v. Nashville, 127 Tenn., 248 , 154 S. W., 1141 ; Ward Seminary v. Mayor and City Council, 129 Tenn., 412 , 167 S. W., 113 ; Chamber of Commerce v. City of Memphis, 144 Tenn., 291 , 232 S. … In City of Chattanooga v.

State v. Brooks

249 S.W.3d 323 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 20, 2008

See, e.g., id.; State v. Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530, 541-42 (Tenn. 1992); State v. Lewis, 36 S.W.3d 88, 96 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000). … Brown, 836 S.W.2d at 542.

Hold Stitch Fabric MacH. Co. v. May Hosiery Mills

184 Tenn. 19 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1946

Jur. 654 ; Forster v. Brown Hoisting Machinery Co., 266 Ill. 287 , 107 N. E. 588 , Ann. Cas. 1916B, 800 et seq.; Luckett v. Delpark, 270 U. S. 496 , 46 S. Ct. 397 , 70 L. Ed. 703 ; Pratt v. … Rep. 457 ; Forster v. Brown Hoisting Machinery Co., 266 Ill. 287 , 107 N. E. 588 , Ann. Cas. 1916B, 800, 805.

Mayor of Chattanooga v. Geiler

81 Tenn. 611 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1884

And that these facts can only be established by the production of an ordinance of the board, and that the engineer had no authority to establish grades. The case of White v. … Board of Aldermen authority to require such citizens as they may designate, to construct foot pavements in front of their lots, and pass over others equally liable to such duty, nor could the corporation itself do it.

Boruff v. CNA Insurance Co.

795 S.W.2d 125 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1990

See Masiers v. Arrow Transfer and Storage Co., 639 S.W.2d 654 (Tenn.1982); Jackson Sawmill v. West, 619 S.W.2d 105 (Tenn.1981); Lindsey v. Smith and Johnson, Inc., 601 S.W.2d 923 (Tenn.1980); Barnes v. … Wooten Transports, Inc. v. Hunter, 535 S.W.2d 858 (Tenn.1976). As noted in Masiers v.

Memphis Street Ry. Co. v. Rapid Transit Co.

138 Tenn. 594 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1917

People v. George Electric Ry. Co., 172 Ill., 129 , 50 N. E., 158 . … Co. v.

Shea v. Mabry

69 Tenn. 319 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1878

Hewet, 2 Yer., 498 ; Taylor v. Taylor, 2 Hum., 597 ; Cowan v. Mitchell, 3 Col., 278 , and Grider v. Harbison, 6 Col., 208 . … At a meeting of the board on the 27th March following, Dr.