Case law

Pulaski Rubber Co. v. Rolin

481 S.W.2d 369 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1972

In Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance Company v. … Chief Justice Burnett, in Lunsford v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co. (1949) 189 Tenn. 293 , 225 S.W.2d 66 , and the late Justice White, in McKenzie v. Campbell & Dann Mfg.

Pratik Pandharipande, M.D. v. FSD Corporation

Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 17, 2023

He also points to emails between FSD’s board members and minutes from FSD’s board meetings which suggest that the board believed short-term rentals were permitted under the 1984 covenants. … Also, a guest staying one or more nights at a hotel or boarding-house.” (emphasis added)).

Baker v. State

191 Tenn. 559 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1950

Upholding the legislative power to eliminate the disqualification by Private Act, the Court also held that the necessary amendment might probably be made by implication, Turner v. … The decision in Turner v. State, supra, was followed and approved in Darnell v. State, 123 Tenn. 663 , 134 S. W. 307 , which is relied on by the present Defendants.

Herman Bros. v. Katz Bros.

101 Tenn. 118 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 11, 1898

Citing Pennebaker v. Tomlinson, 1 Tenn. Ch., 603; Brown v. Allen, 3 Head, 429 ; Bradley & Dortch v. Kesee, 5 Cold., 226 ; Connell v. Scott, 5 Bax., 598 ; Freeman on Executions, Sec. 268. … Brown v. Allen, 3 Head, 429 ; Bradley v. Kesee, 5 Cold., 226 ; Connell v. Scott, 5 Bax., 598 ; Evans v. Barnes, 2 Swan, 293 .

Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Davis ex rel. Davis

127 Tenn. 167 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1912

Railroad v. Flood, 122 Tenn., 56 , 113 S. W., 384 , and authorities there cited. … Parris v. Brown, 5 Yerg., 267 ; Railroad v. Flood, supra; Manning v. Wells, 9 Humph., 746 , 51 Am. Dec. 688 ; Odell v. Koppee, 5 Heisk., 90 ; Wood v. Hancock, 4 Humph., 467 ; Watkins v.

Caton v. Pic-Walsh Freight Co.

211 Tenn. 334 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1963

On August 5, 1960, these charges were withdrawn from the Board. … Company v.

Provident Life & Accident Ins. v. Prieto

169 Tenn. 124 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1935

Brown v. Sun Life Insurance Co. (Tenn. Ch. App., 1899), 57 S. W., 415 , 416, 51 L. R. … Cas., 1912D, 1246]; Railroad Co. v. Herb, 134 Tenn. [397], 401 [ 183 S. W., 1011 ]; Brown v. Sun Life Insurance Co. [(Tenn. Ch. App.), 57 S. W., 415 ], 51 L. R. A., 252.

Calloway v. Hopkins

58 Tenn. 349 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1872

This was substantially held in Polk’s lessee v. Wendle, 5 Wheaton, 292; also Polk’s lessee v. Wendle, 9 Cranch, 87 . … If made after the Act of 1783, in Armstrong’s office, it was not necessarily void 'because the land was west of Brown’s line, for entries might have been lawfully made west of Brown’s line; but it would still be subject to

Calloway v. Hopkins

58 Tenn. 349 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1872

This was substantially held in Polk’s lessee v. Wendle, 5 Wheaton, 292; also Polk’s lessee v. Wendle, 9 Cranch, 87 . … If made after the Act of 1783, in Armstrong’s office, it was not necessarily void 'because the land was west of Brown’s line, for entries might have been lawfully made west of Brown’s line; but it would still be subject to

Calloway v. Hopkins

58 Tenn. 349 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1872

This was substantially held in Polk’s lessee v. Wendle, 5 Wheaton, 292; also Polk’s lessee v. Wendle, 9 Cranch, 87 . … If made after the Act of 1783, in Armstrong’s office, it was not necessarily void 'because the land was west of Brown’s line, for entries might have been lawfully made west of Brown’s line; but it would still be subject to

Employers Re-Insurance Corp. v. Going

161 Tenn. 79 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1930

In Mengle Box Company v. … On pag-e 263 (Spurlock v.

West v. Moore

193 Tenn. 431 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1952

Compare Wallace v. McPherson, 187 Tenn. 333, 342-343 , 214 S. W. (2d) 50 . … Hagey) were in the continuous adverse possession of the land, the right of action would ordinarily be barred, * * Brown v. Brown, 82 Tenn. 253, 254 .

McDonald v. City of Nashville

114 Tenn. 540 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1904

In Preston v. … In Daniel v. Coal Company, 105 Tenn., 470 , 58 S.

West v. Pratt

871 S.W.2d 477 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1994

See e.g., Brown v. … Co. v. Glens Falls Ins.

Automobile Sales Co. v. Johnson

174 Tenn. 38 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1938

As authority for this insistence, Quinton v. Board of Claims, 165 Tenn., 201 , 54 S. W. (2d), 953 , is cited, wherein, on page 215, 54 S. … Rep., 641 ; Mayrhofer v. Board of Education et al., 89 Cal., 110 , 26 P., 646 , 23 Am. St. Rep., 451 .

Caldwell v. Huffstutter

173 Tenn. 225 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 28, 1938

In Gordon v. … In Wilson v.

Nelson v. Haywood County

4 L.R.A. 648 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1889

In Aspinwall v. … Town of Coloma v. Eaves, 92 U. S., 484 ; Humboldt Township v. Long, 92 U. S., 642 ; Dixon County v. Field, 111 U. S., 94 ; Anderson County, etc., v. Beal, 113 U. S., 238 .

East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad v. Stuart

1 Shan. Cas. 376 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1875

See on this subject 1st Ohitty, PL, 672-3; Stephen’s PL, p. 147; Horsely v. Branch, 1 Hum., 199 ; Brown v. Parks, 8 Hum., 294 . Such we think is this case.

Smith v. State Technical Institute at Memphis

682 S.W.2d 915 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1984

State Board of Education Rule 0520-2-3-01(5). … As noted in Potts v.

New York Life Ins. Co. v. Bank of Commerce & Trust Co.

172 Tenn. 226 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1937

In Ford v. Brown & Co., 114 Tenn., 467 , 88 S. W., 1036 , 1038, 1 L. R. A. (N. S.), 188, two certificates of deposit were involved, dealt with, together, one of which read, “C. N. … The opinion cited Ford v. Brown & Co., supra, and our older decisions of Alexander v. Alderson, 66 Tenn. (7 Baxt.), 403; Covington v. Anderson, 84 Tenn. *234 (16 Lea), 310, and Caulkins v.