Case law

Childress v. State

133 Tenn. 121 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1915

State ex rel. v. Kilvington, 100 Tenn., 227 , 45 S. W., 433 , 41 L. R. A., 284. … C.), 196 Fed., 123 ; Marlowe v. Commonwealth, 142 Ky., 106 , 133 S. W., 1137 ; Mill v. Brown, 31 Utah, 473 , 88 Pac., 609 ; 120 Am. St. Rep., 935 ; Lindsay v. Lindsay, 257 Ill. 328 , 100 N. E., 892 , 45 L. R. A. (N.

Curde v. Tri-City Bank & Trust Co.

826 S.W.2d 911 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1992

Boston Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States, 278 U.S. 41, 48 , 49 S.Ct. 52, 54 , 73 L.Ed. 170 (1928) (Holmes, J.), quoted with approval in Watt v. Alaska, 451 U.S. 259, 266 , 101 S.Ct. 1673, 1678 , 68 L.Ed.2d 80 (1981). … or in conformity with any interpretation or approval by an official or employee of the Federal Reserve System duly authorized by the Board to issue such interpretations or approvals under such procedures as the Board may

Dunnebacke v. Williams

214 Tenn. 581 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 4, 1964

Smith v. Smith, supra, and Smith v. Fielden, supra. … In Smith v.

Nat. Optical Stores Co., Inc. v. Bryant

181 Tenn. 266 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1944

Despite these facts found by the Board of Review, conceded to be sustained by material evidence, the insistence of appellant is that Dr. … 'We have re-examined our cases cited for appellant, Texas Co. v. Bryant, 178 Tenn., 1 , 152 S. W. (2d) 627 ; Powell v. Virginia Construction Co., supra; Odom v. Sanford & Treadway, 156 Tenn., 202 , 299 S.

Jennings v. Lamb

201 Tenn. 1 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1956

He then referred to the case of Black v. … Co. v. United States Canopy Co., 111 Tenn. 202 , 77 S.W. 1062 , and in Memphis Casting Works v.

State v. Pendergrass

937 S.W.2d 834 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1996

Brown v. Brown, 198 Tenn. 600 , 281 S.W.2d 492, 497 (1955). Pursuant to Rule 36, Tenn. R.Crim. … P. 37(b)(2)(iv) as it was interpreted by this Court in State v.

Osborn v. City of Nashville

182 Tenn. 197 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1945

L. 169, 170, 171, sec. 141; Lovier v. City of Nashville, 1 Tenn. App. 401 ; Park City v. Owens, 7 Tenn. Civ. App. 359; Jackson v. City of Nashville, 17 Tenn. App. 413, 417 , 68 S. W. (2d) 137 . … Brown v. Brown, 155 Tenn. 530 , 296 S. W. 356 ; Lillard v. Tolliver, 154 Tenn. 304 , 285 S. W. 576 .

Townsend v. Neuhardt

139 Tenn. 695 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1918

Lookout Mountain Rail *698 road Co. v. Houston, 85 Tenn., 224 -226, 2 S. W., 36 ; Brown v. Bussey, 7 Humph. (26 Tenn.), 573, 574; Hall v. Rodgers, 7 Humph., 536 , 540, 541; Mills v. Mills, 3 Head (40 Tenn.), 705, 711. … Tappan v. Campbell, 9 Yerg. (17 Tenn.), 436; Cathcart v. Thomas, 8 Baxt. (67 Tenn.), 172; Rivers v. *699 Thomas, 1 Lea (69 Tenn.), 649, 650, 27 Am. Rep., 784 . So, in either view, there was a consideration. Macon v.

Saylors v. City of Jackson

575 S.W.2d 264 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1978

Spoone v. Mayor and Aldermen of Morristown, 222 Tenn. 21 , 431 S.W.2d 827 (1968); State v. City of Columbia, 208 Tenn. 59 , 343 S.W.2d 888 (1961); Morton v. Johnson City, 206 Tenn. 411 , 333 S.W.2d 924 (1960); Witt v. … In Kingsport v.

Lynn v. Polk

76 Tenn. 328 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1881

The cases of Yost v. Gaines and of Keith v. … The cases of Yost v. Gaines and Keith v. Clark, so far as the recollection of the court goes, were cases in which no written opinions were given, they are not known to be reported.

Prescott v. Town of Lennox

100 Tenn. 591 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1898

As supporting this proposition, we refer to Laramie v. Albany, 92 U. S., 315 ; Mt. Pleasant v. Beckwith, 100 U. S., 525 ; County of Chickasaw v. County of Sumner, 58 Miss., 619 ; Hempstead v. N. … Hempstead, 2 Wend., 109 ; School District v. Tapley, 1 Allen (Mass.), 49; Inhabitants of Bloomfield v. Mayers, etc. (New Jersey, 1896), 33 Atl. Rep., 926 ; Allen v. *593 Macey (Ind.), 10 N. E. Rep., 578.

Arnold v. State

96 Tenn. 82 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1896

Sherman v. Brown et al., 4 Yerg., 561 . The appeal must, therefore, be dismissed at the cost of defendant.

Tennessee Waste Movers, Inc. v. Loudon County

160 S.W.3d 517 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 18, 2005

Odle v. McCormack, 206 S.W.2d 416, 419 (Tenn. 1947) (citation omitted); see also Cooper v. … The Board rejected the plaintiffs’ request, and the plaintiffs appealed to the local chancery court. Id. at 616.

Singer v. Singer

122 Tenn. 671 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1909

Justice Brown, in the case of New Orleans Pac. Railway Co. v. *686 Parker, 143 U. S., 42 , 12 Sup. Ct., 364, 36 L. … In Davies v.

Gotten v. Gowen

113 Tenn. 174 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1904

The cases of Woodbury v. Brown, 101 Tenn., 707 , 50 S. W., 743 , and State v. Frost, 103 Tenn., 685 , 54 S. W., 986 , are not in point.

Curtis v. Garrison

211 Tenn. 339 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1963

Harmon v. Tyler, 112 Tenn. 8 [ 83 S.W. 1041 ]; Board of Directors [etc.] v. Bodkin Bros., 108 Tenn. 713 [ 69 S.W. 270 ]; Baker v. Mitchell, 105 Tenn. 610 [ 59 S.W. 137 ]; In re [New River] Lumber & Mfg. … Gibson’s Suits in Chancery (New) par. 290; Agee v. Dement, 1 Humph. 332 ; White v. Buchanan, 6 Cold. 32 ; Noel v. Scoby, 2 Heisk, 20; Ferris v. Fort, 2 Tenn. Ch. 150; Board v.

State v. Hartman

703 S.W.2d 106 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1985

In United States v. … See generally State v. McKay and Sample, 680 S.W.2d 447 (1984); State v. Austin, 618 S.W.2d 738 (Tenn.1981); State v. Pritchett, 621 S.W.2d 127 (Tenn.1981); Houston v. State, 593 S.W.2d 267 (Tenn.1980).

State ex rel. Simmons v. Latimer

186 Tenn. 577 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1948

Bill for mandamus cannot be filed successfully against a licensing Board to compel an exercise of discretion. State ex rel. v. Beasley, (3 cases), 182 Tenn. 519, 523, 529 , 188 S. W. (2d) 332 ; Wright v. … Chapter 53, Public Acts 1943; Putnam County Beer Board v. Speck, 184 Tenn. 616, 620 , 201 S. W. (2d) 991 ; Cravens v. Storie, Mayor, supra; State ex rel. Cravens v. Delk, supra.

State ex rel. Lyle v. Willett

117 Tenn. 334 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1906

In Foley v. … In State v.

Flannary v. Flannary

121 S.W.3d 647 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 16, 2003

Smith v. Smith, 93 S.W.3d 871, 875 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). Accordingly, the division of a marital estate must start with the classification of the parties’ property. Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 166 (Tenn. Ct. … See Storey v. Storey, 835 S.W.2d 593, 598 (Tenn. Ct.