Case law

Blankenship v. State

858 S.W.2d 897 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1993

Brown v. Perini, 718 F.2d 784, 786 (6th Cir.1983), quoted in Caudill v. Jago, 747 F.2d 1046, 1052 (6th Cir.1984). … Brown v. *905 Perini, 718 F.2d at 788 (citing Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. at 756 , 90 S.Ct. at 1473 ).

Tiffinne Wendalyn Gail Runions v. Jackson -Madison County General Hospital District

549 S.W.3d 77 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 6, 2018

Relying on Hinkle v. Kindred Hospital, No. M2010-02499-COA-R3-CV, 2012 WL 3799215 (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 31, 2012), and Brown v. Samples, No. E2013-00799- COA-R9-CV, 2014 WL 1713773 (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 29, 2014), Ms. … Runions argues that pre-suit notice to the business address of the facility where she received treatment satisfied the pre-suit notice requirement of Tennessee Code Annotated section 29-26-121(a)(1), citing Brown v.

State of Tennessee v. Linnell Richmond

Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 1, 2002

Officer Waggoner further identified photos of Shannon Brown’s clothing with a bullet hole, a wound on Shannon Brown’s side and a picture of Shannon Brown. … Citing State v.

Bendet v. Ellis

120 Tenn. 277 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1907

Co. v. Brown, 66 S. W., 613 , 23 Ky. Law Rep., 2070 ) it appeared that a policy was issued by the insurance company to Charles L. … Brown, and that the first premium Avas paid by George Pinson, Jr.; Brown stating to the insurance agent that Pinson paid for him at his request.

Smith v. Gore

728 S.W.2d 738 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1987

Auth. v. Graves, supra, 314 S.E.2d at 655-656 ; Nanke v. Napier, supra, at 522-523; Weintraub v. Brown, supra, 470 N.Y.S.2d at 641 ; Schork v. Huber, supra, at 862; Mason v. … Western Pennsylvania Hosp., supra, 453 A.2d at 976 ; Public Health Trust v. Brown, supra, at 1085; Coleman v. Garrison, supra, at 13.

State v. McCandless

208 Tenn. 103 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1961

Further, that in such a situation the statement of Judge Cook is applicable which appears in Board of Equalization v. Nashville, C. & St. L. … Co. v. Smith, 147 Tenn. 453 , 249 S.W. 377 ; and Board of Equalization v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry., 148 Tenn. 676 , 257 S.W. 91 .

Wilson v. Clinton Chapel African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church

138 Tenn. 398 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1917

the board of trustees and the church have prosecuted an appeal to this court. … Doty v. Telephone & Telegraph Co., supra; Jonesboro v. McKee, 2 Yerg. (10 Tenn.), 167.

Standard Advertising Agency, Inc. v. Jackson

735 S.W.2d 441 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1987

In the case of Widdicombe v. … The corporation had a separate legal existence apart from Brown.

Scott v. Wagstaff

120 Tenn. 252 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1907

Dec., 185 ; Gibson v. Lane, 9 Yerg., 475 . … This is a fair deduction from the following cases: Cornwell v. Cornwell, 11 Humph., 485 ; Wynne v. Spiers, 7 Humph., 394 ; Keith v. Raglan, 1 Cold, 474; Brown v. Brown, 14 Lea, 259 , 52 Am. Rep., 169 ; Crocker v.

McCurry v. Container Corp. of America

982 S.W.2d 841 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1998

Brown testified that he talked to Mr. Woods that evening and did not notice any signs of anger or intoxication. Mr. … See Branco v. Leviton Mfg. Co., 518 A.2d 621 (R .I. 1986); Baughman v. Eaton Corp., 62 Oh io St. 2d 62 , 402 N.E .2d 1201 (1980); Epler v. North Am. Rockwell Corp., 482 Pa. 391, 393 A.2d 1163 (1 978); Kno op v.

Kroger Co. v. Johnson

221 Tenn. 649 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 1, 1967

In Brown Shoe Co. v. … In Sears-Roebuck & Co. v. Starnes, supra the employee would expect a callous to develop on her finger but would not expect an infection from the callous. In Brown Shoe Company r.

State ex rel. Gilliam v. Hendrixson

202 Tenn. 428 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1957

Hendrixson, the Superintendent of Schools of DeKalb County and the members of the Board of Education for the purpose of enjoining said respondents from transferring each of said ladies from the school where she has been teaching … That statute is *430 rather fully discussed in State v. Yoakum, 201 Tenn. 180 , 297 S.W.2d 635 , to wliicb reference is here made.

Craig v. Mayor and Aldermen

168 Tenn. 413 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1935

Undoubtedly the mayor and board of aldermen had the power to regulate the hours of opening and closing pool rooms, but this board cannot, under the guise of regulation, prohibit to a material degree the exercise of the privilege … In Grills v.

Walker v. Bruno's, Inc.

650 S.W.2d 357 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1983

In Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943), the Supreme Court acknowledged that a state may engage in anti-competitive conduct and not run afoul of the Sherman Act. … Brown and its progeny: “These decisions establish two standards for antitrust immunity under Parker v. Brown.

State v. Renner

912 S.W.2d 701 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1995

See, e.g., Brown v. United States, 256 U.S. 335 , 41 S.Ct. 501 , 65 L.Ed. 961 (1921); Alberty v. United States, 162 U.S. 499 , 16 S.Ct. 864 , 40 L.Ed. 1051 (1896); Beard v. … Brown, 256 U.S. at 343 , 41 S.Ct. at 502 .

Baker v. Milam

191 Tenn. 54 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1950

Muse v. Lexington, 110 Tenn. 655, 665 , 76 S. W. 481 ; Soukup v. Sell, 171 Tenn. 437, 442 , 104 S. W. (2d) 830 . This rule is clearly stated in Red River Furnace Co. v. Tenn. … State Board of Education, 186 Tenn. 11 , 207 S. W. (2d) 1011 , and Baker v. Milam, 186 Tenn. 20 , 207 S.

Charles v. Carter

96 Tenn. 607 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 18, 1896

Cooper v. Sanford, 4 Yer., 452 . … Brooks v. Paper Co., 94 Tenn., 710 .

Johnson City v. Railroad

100 Tenn. 138 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1898

Sutliff v. Lake County, 147 U. S., 238 ; Citizens' S. & L. A. v. Perry County, 156 U. S., 709 ; Chaffee v. Potter, 142 U. S., 355 ; Dixon County v. Field, 111 U. S., 8 ; Bank v. Potter, 110 U. … S., 608 ; Sherman County v. Simonds, 109 U. S., 735 ; Buchanan v. Litchfield, 102 U. S., 278 ; Anthony v. Jasper County, 101 U. S., 693 ; Marcy v. Oswego, 92 U. S., 637 ; Coloma v. Eaves, Ib., 484; Humboldt v.

State ex rel. Nealis v. Nolan

76 Tenn. 663 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1881

The cases and items due for board, as aforesaid, are as follows — setting out each case, wiph the amount due. … The cases of Akers and Union Publishing Co. v. Burch, comptroller, 12 Heis., 613, and State, etc., ex rel. Marchbanks v.

Tidwell v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

520 S.W.2d 721 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1975

To this end it entered into an agreement with the Industrial Development Board of Union City. … The entire physical establishment is owned by the Board, with the bond issue being amortized by rental proceeds.