Case law

State v. Wright

57 Tenn. 237 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1872

People v. … Brown v. O’Brien, 2 Indiana, 423; State v. Jones, 19 Indiana, 356. And so in Illinois they are not clothed with any discretionary power. They are not allowed to reject any returns. 29 Illinois, 422; 15 Illinois, 500.

State of Tennessee v. Takeita M. Locke

90 S.W.3d 663 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 1, 2002

State v . Burns, 6 S.W.3d 453, 464 (Tenn. 1999) (quoting State v. Langford, 994 S.W.2d 126, 128 (Tenn. 1999)). … Recently, in State v.

Harrison v. McMillan

109 Tenn. 77 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1902

as for the board, and that it would be their duty to ascertain from the testimony what would be a reasonable charge for the nursing as well as for the board. … That it was error on the trial of the case in the circuit court to allow testimony of a canse of action not embraced in the warrant is shown by the case of Watkins v. Kittrell, 3 Baxt., 38 . And see Sale v.

William Thomas McFarland v. Michael S. Pemberton

530 S.W.3d 76 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 20, 2017

Stewart v. … See Comer v.

State v. Brooks

224 Tenn. 712 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1970

We think this was error, and hold, on authority of Hite v. State, supra; Young et al. v. State, 185 Tenn. 596 , 206 S.W.2d 805 (1947); Brown v. State, 186 Tenn. 378 , 210 S.W.2d 670 (1948); and Wilson v. … In Brown v. State, supra, 186 Tenn. at page 389 , 210 S.W.2d 670 , 27 Am.Jur., is approvingly quoted as saying- that a variance is immaterial “if the allegation was surplusage”.

Ferguson v. Tyler

134 Tenn. 25 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1915

In Nashville v. … In Knoxville v. Lewis, 12 Lea (80 Tenn.), 180, referring to the specific ruling in Nashville v.

State ex rel. Nicholson v. Bush

136 Tenn. 478 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1916

This act was held constitutional in Woods v. State, 130 Tenn., 100 , 169 S. W., 558 , L. R. A., 1915F, 531. … In section 3 of the act it is specifically provided: “Such convicts, while on parole, shall remain in the lawful custody and under the control of said board, subject at any time to be returned to the penitentiary,” etc.

Crews v. Buckman Laboratories International, Inc.

78 S.W.3d 852 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 24, 2002

In GTE Products Corp. v. … In Burkhart v.

Reasonover v. City of Memphis

162 Tenn. 633 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1931

Devine v. Grocery Co., 97 Tenn., 603 , 37 S. W., 390 ; State v. Schlitz Brewing Co., 104 Tenn., 715 , 59 S. … State v. Railroad, 124 Tenn., 1 , 135 S. W., 773 .

Odom v. Gray

508 S.W.2d 526 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1974

Payne had been involved in a fight with David Brown, an off-duty city policeman. … Loftis v. Finch (1973), Tcnn.App., 491 S.W.2d 370 . This Court does have authority to reinstate all or part of the remittitur suggested by the Trial Judge. Murphy Truck Lines v. Brown, 203 Tenn. 414 , 313 S.W.2d 440 .

Gray v. Cullom MacHine, Tool & Die, Inc.

152 S.W.3d 439 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 20, 2004

Brown, Cleveland, Tennessee, for the Appellee, Billy Gene Gray. … Cleek v.

Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Wright

147 Tenn. 619 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1922

Pictures of accidents showing the benefit from and the necessity of wearing goggles were constantly posted on the bulletin boards. … Bradbury’s Workmen’s Compensation Law (3d Ed.), p. 531; Wick v. Gunn, 66 Okl., 316 , 169 Pac., 1087 , 4 A. L. R., 107; Bersch v. Morris & Co., 106 Kan., 800 , 189 Pac., 934 , 9 A. L. R., 1374.

In Re: Petition To Stay The Effectiveness of Formal Ethics Opinion 2017-F-163

Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 23, 2019

Bar Ass’n v. … In United States v.

Clark v. Vaughn

177 Tenn. 76 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1941

Bales et al. v. Hamilton County et al., 170 Tenn., 371 , 95 S. … For other illustrations of special statutes held invalid because conflicting with general laws, see, for example, Woodard v. Brien, 82 Tenn. (14 Lea), 520; Carlock v. Chattanooga, 130 Tenn., 330 , 170 S.

Woolard v. Nashville

108 Tenn. 353 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1902

The case of Tuttle v. … State v. Jersey City, 24 N. J. L., 662; White Township v. Probate Judge, 53 Mich., 130 ; Kramer v. Cleveland, 5 Ohio St., 140 .

State v. Hatcher

310 S.W.3d 788 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 4, 2010

Chris constantly bullied Defendant, and Brown stated that there were “many times” when she saw Chris “beating” Defendant. According to Brown, Defendant was afraid of Chris. … See State v.

Richards v. Lewisburg Alcoholic Beverage Commission

543 S.W.2d 852 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1977

In Cantrell v. DeKalb Co. … We reaffirmed this holding in Lones v. Blount County Beer Board, 538 S.W.2d 386 (Tenn.1976). Under this standard of review we cannot conceive of any prejudice arising from an inadequate notice. III.

Lodge Mfg. Co. v. Gilbert

195 Tenn. 403 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1953

Trades Council v. *407 Ledbetter, 256 Ala. 678 , 57 So. (2d) 112 , it was held that the Taft-Hartley Act determined the rights of the parties, but sustained the jurisdiction of the State Court on account of the urgent need … In Nashville Corp. v. United Steelworkers, etc., 187 Tenn. 444 , 215 S.

Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Hardie

171 Tenn. 43 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1936

Baird v. Rogers, 95 Tenn., 492 , 32 S. W., 630 . Statutory authority lacking, the immunity extends to the agencies of *45 other governments. Board of Directors v. Bodkin Bros., 108 Tenn., 700 , 69 S. … In Dickens v.

Ready Mix, USA, LLC v. Jefferson County, Tennessee

380 S.W.3d 52 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 30, 2012

V. … Enters. v.