Case law

Frye v. Memphis State University

806 S.W.2d 170 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1991

Frye then appealed to the Board of Regents. The personnel committee of the Board of Regents reviewed the appeal and recommended to the Board that the termination be upheld. The Board accepted that ruling today.” … Rasimas v.

Gray v. Holloway Construction Co.

834 S.W.2d 277 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 26, 1992

Accord True v. … .”); Grizzard v.

State v. Gibson County

134 Tenn. 526 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1916

In the case of State ex rel. v. Cummins, 99 Tenn., 667 , 42 S. … In State v. Davidson, 96 Tenn., 178 , 33 S.

Wallace v. McPherson

187 Tenn. 333 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1947

Rogers v. Winton, 21 Tenn. 178 ; Brown v. Brown, 82 Tenn. 253 , 52 Am. Rep. 169 . … See Swiney v. Swiney, 82 Tenn. 316, 318 , and cases cited; also Brummit v. Brown, 159 Tenn. 612 , 21 S. W. (2d) 626 . The intention of the testator in all will cases is controlling.

State Ex Rel. Town of South Carthage v. Barrett

840 S.W.2d 895 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1992

Haywood v. … Roach v.

Nash v. Knoxville

108 Tenn. 68 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1901

Complainant alleges that at that time he was Secretary of the Municipal Board of Health. … Counsel cite in support of this position Nashville v.

Fox v. State

111 Tenn. 154 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1903

State, 6 Lea, 146 ; *159 Jones v. State, 10 Lea, 588 ; Brown v. State, 85 Tenn. (1 Pickle), 439, 2 S. W., 895 . In the case of Taylor v. … Similar to this was the case of Brown v. State, 85 Tenn. (1 Pickle), 441, 2 S.

Halliburton v. Flowers

59 Tenn. 25 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1873

Brown, E. Boy-ett, and J. H. McDaniel. On the 1st of July, 1871, two of the arbitrators met with the plaintiff and defendant, for the purpose of arbitrating the cause. … Cooley v. Dill, 1 Swan, 313 . We have already expressed the opinion that the present case was not affected by the statute, and it follows, therefore, that the decision just cited is a controlling authority in this case.

Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Falls

169 Tenn. 324 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1935

Co. v. Lucky Strike Oil & Gas Co., 70 Okla., 146 , 173 P., 845 , 22 A. L. R., 398; National Ins. Co. v. Brown, 128 Pa., 386 , 18 A., 389 ; Cornell v. Milwaukee Fire Ins. … Co. v. Brown, 128 Pa., 386 , 18 A., 389 . This court, in Mecklenburg Real Estate Co. v. Kyoleum Co., 142 Tenn., 295, 302 , 218 S. W., 821 , 823, 14 A. L.

State Ex Rel. Angle v. City of Knoxville

180 Tenn. 462 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1944

Hancock v. Davidson County et al., 171 Tenn., 420, 433 , 104 S. W. (2d), 824 ; Rushing v. Tenn. Crime Comm., 173 Tenn., 308, 318 , 117 S. W. (2d) 4 . … State ex rel. v. Hamilton County, 170 Tenn., 371 , 95 S. W. (2d), 618 ; Anderson v. Carter County, 172 Tenn., 114 , 110 S. W. (2d), 321 ; State ex rel. v. Trotter, 153 Tenn., 30 , 281 S. W., 925 .” (Emphasis ours.)

Blanz v. Bain

95 Tenn. 87 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 25, 1895

Jackson v. Rutledge, 3 Lea, 626 ; Hook v. Donaldson, 9 Lea, 60 ; Meagher v. Hollenberg , 9 Lea, 392 ; Browning v. Browning, 11 Lea, 110 ; Federlicht v. Glass, 13 Lea, 487 ; Willingham v. Lake, 7 Bax., 453 . … Lusalle v. Powell, 7 Cold., 277 ; Sexton v. Alberta, 10 Lea, 452 .

State v. Simpson

198 Tenn. 695 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1955

W. (2d) 480, 482 ; Douglas v. Pittman, 239 Ky. 548 , 39 S. W. (2d) 979 ; and that is true even where there remains in office only one member, which is our exact situation in the present case. Barton v. … Glass v. Hopkinsville, 225 Ky. 428 , 9 S. W. (2d) 117 . In Note 87 to the text in C. J. S., the Missouri case of State ex rel. Thurlo v. Harper, 336 Mo. 717 , 80 S.

Hart v. Brandon

169 Tenn. 411 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1935

See, among others, Frazier v. East Tennessee, V. & G. Ry. Co., 88 Tenn., 138, 140 , 12 S. W., 53 7; Hunter v. Memphis, 93 Tenn., 571, 572 , 26 S. W., 828 ; Southern Const. Co. v. Halliburton, 149 Tenn., 319 , 258 S. … of education [see the recent case of State ex rel. v.

Abercrombie v. City of Chattanooga

203 Tenn. 357 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1958

We know of no board, or public official, that may hold an election for a municipal purpose except the complainant Board of Election Commissioners. … In Southern v.

Jackson v. Van Dresser

188 Tenn. 384 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1949

Other than Brown v. Eckhardt, 23 Tenn. App. 217, 230 , 129 S. W. (2d) 1122 , and Pritchett v. … Brown v. Eckhardt, supra; Bradford v. American Nat. Bank, 25 Tenn. App. 413, 419 , 158 S. W. (2d) 366 ; Kirk v. Sumner County Bk. & Tr. Co. *391 et al., 25 Tenn. App. 150, 156 , 153 S. W. (2d) 139 ; Walker v.

Lansden v. City of Jackson

142 Tenn. 650 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1920

In Nashville v. … See, also, Mayor, etc., v. Hagan, 9 Baxt., 495 ; Belote v. Wynne, 7 Yerg., 341 ; Muse v. Donelson, 2 Humph., 166 .

Memphis v. Smythe

104 Tenn. 702 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1900

Meaher v. Chattanooga, 1 Head, 76 ; Wood v. Grand Junction, 5 Heis., 440. … The Board took no action until Friday morning, when one of its employees telephoned to the defendant in error that a report of the ease of diphtheria at his house was required.

City of Winchester v. Finchum

201 Tenn. 604 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1957

McCrady, supra, 174 Ténn. 166, 124 S.W.2d 248 ; Batts v. City of Nashville, supra, 22 Tenn.App. 423 , 123 S.W.2d 1099 ; City of Nashville v. Brown, 25 Tenn.App. 340, 347 , 157 S.W.2d 612 , [617]; Osborn v. … '“In Adams v. Brown, supra, plaintiff violated a statute by overtaking and attempting to pass another vehicle in an intersection of highways.

Unicoi County v. Barnett

181 Tenn. 565 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1944

Chandler v. Davidson County, 142 Tenn., 265 , 218 S. W., 222 , which might have sustained recovery on the nuisance theory, has been expressly overruled in Buckholtz v. Hamilton County, 180 Tenn., 263 , 174 S. … If the landowner so desires he may prosecute his claim befbre the Board of Claims.

Halliburton v. Flowers

59 Tenn. 25 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1873

Brown, E. Boy-ett, and J. H. McDaniel. On the 1st of July, 1871, two of the arbitrators met with the plaintiff and defendant, for the purpose of arbitrating the cause. … Cooley v. Dill, 1 Swan, 313 . We have already expressed the opinion that the present case was not affected by the statute, and it follows, therefore, that the decision just cited is a controlling authority in this case.