Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,777 results
0.32s
Phi Delta Theta Fraternity v. Commissioner
90 T.C. 1033 · United States Tax Court · May 16, 1988
Petitioner argues that the pubhcation of the ScroU magazine qualifies within the educational purview of section 170(c)(4). … We find petitioner’s expert’s perspective to be too narrow and his understanding of the term “educational” not to properly fit within the established tax law concepts.
Cited 11 timesPublishedAnn Jackson Family Found. v. Commissioner
97 T.C. 534 · United States Tax Court · Nov 12, 1991
Print 1981). 7 Petitioner argues that the legislative history shows clearly that Congress deliberately intended to reheve split-interest trusts from the mandatory distribution requirement applicable to private foundations … 80 T.C. 252 (1983), where a regulation was held invalid, which sought to modify a statutory provision keyed to the “par or stated value” of the outstanding stock of a corporation claiming DISC status under section 992 by establishing
Cited 15 timesPublishedADVO, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
141 T.C. 298 · United States Tax Court · Oct 24, 2013
By adopting these regula- tions, Treasury clearly intended a different interpretation of these terms. … the qualifying activ- ity was occurring?
Cited 9 timesPublished66 T.C. 718 · United States Tax Court · Jul 19, 1976
Finally, respondent argues that there is no evidence establishing a useful life of the airport runway and two adjacent taxiways from which an investment tax credit can be established. … Sec. 46(c) provides: (c) Qualified Investment.— (1) In general. — For purposes of this subpart, the term “qualified investment” means, with respect to any taxable year, the aggregate of— (A) the applicable percentage of the
Cited 25 timesPublished8 T.C. 350 · United States Tax Court · Feb 19, 1947
This is not sufficient to qualify either of these debts as one that became worthless within the taxable year. 5 Mertens Law of Federal Income Taxation, p. 416, ¶30.42, citing authorities. … We think the facts clearly establish that during 1941 Walter, Jr., rendered “vital” additional services to the partnership of Mid-South Paving' Co. within the rule of the Tower and Lusthaus cases, supra, and was entitled
Cited 3 timesPublished34 T.C. 533 · United States Tax Court · Jun 23, 1960
Sections 13-62 and 18-72 merely contain grants of power to the directors to do such acts as disposing of all of the property of a corporation, a power the directors would not ordinarily have since such acts are clearly beyond … Section 112(b) (7) (C) provides as follows : (C) Qualified Electing Shareholders. — The term “qualified electing shareholder” means a shareholder (other than an excluded corporation) of any class of stock (whether or not
Cited 6 timesPublishedScott Paper Co. v. Commissioner
74 T.C. 137 · United States Tax Court · Apr 28, 1980
No part of the primary electric could qualify as section 38 property unless the entire system qualified. … These factors clearly show that the physical makeup of the primary electric is attributable to the variety of power demand at the facility.
Cited 33 timesPublishedHudson City Sav. Bank v. Commissioner
53 T.C. 70 · United States Tax Court · Oct 23, 1969
The fact that an item may not qualify as a deduction for section 591 purposes in a particular year does not mean it cannot qualify as a “liability” for section 593 purposes in such year. … The amount of interest fully qualifies -as a “liability” for purposes of section 593.
Cited 3 timesPublished76 T.C. 153 · United States Tax Court · Jan 28, 1981
Heller & Co., 204 So. 2d 856 (Miss. 1967), relied on by petitioner, is clearly distinguishable. … A clearly measurable standard under which the holder of a power is legally accountable is such a standard for this purpose.
Cited 4 timesPublishedHydraulic Press Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner
27 T.C. 278 · United States Tax Court · Nov 9, 1956
The evidence clearly shows that prior to January 1,1940, the petitioner was committed to a course of action calling for the construction of an addition to its plant. … This reconstruction is based upon all the qualifying factors contended for in petitioner’s various applications for relief and amendments thereto, the principal qualifying factor being the commitment for increased capacity
Cited 0 timesPublishedAdvo, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
141 T.C. No. 9 · United States Tax Court · Oct 24, 2013
By adopting these regulations, Treasury clearly intended a different interpretation of these terms. (continued... … The Supreme Court has established a two-prong test for determining whether to afford an agency pronouncement Chevron deference.
Cited 0 timesPublished71 T.C. 692 · United States Tax Court · Jan 29, 1979
As the facts clearly indicate, the resolution of this issue is not in petitioners’ favor. … We do not reach the question of whether to constitute a plan, the terms of the arrangement must be firm and fixed and the steps clearly integrated.
Cited 9 timesPublished66 T.C. 223 · United States Tax Court · May 5, 1976
Failure to establish any one of these criteria suffices to preclude application of section 119. Gordon S. Dole, supra. … Clearly petitioners realized an economic gain to the extent that Gulf provided them with lodging, the cost of which they would otherwise have incurred in order to live in Tokyo.
Cited 22 timesPublished54 T.C. 59 · United States Tax Court · Jan 26, 1970
The license agreement was obviously not entered into at arm’s length and clearly did not in fact govern and was not intended to govern the business relationships between Medco Electronics and DeGroff. … Indeed it has already been well established that no such exchange for their interest is required in such circumstances. See Ralph C.
Cited 12 timesPublishedMariani Frozen Foods, Inc. v. Commissioner
81 T.C. 448 · United States Tax Court · Sep 21, 1983
But more important, in order that income may be clearly reflected for any taxable year, it is necessary to reflect the state tax liabilities for that year. … This requirement has been adopted by several other circuits: "we hold that Davant establishes criteria which adequately define when a reorganization qualifies as a mere change in form, identity, or place of incorporation.
Cited 6 timesPublished56 T.C. 191 · United States Tax Court · Apr 28, 1971
On the record herein, we hold that petitioners failed to establish the worthlessness of their Mill Fab stock in 1965. … We have already held that the Camden Road property qualified as petitioners' “old residence.”
Cited 31 timesPublished80 T.C. 362 · United States Tax Court · Feb 7, 1983
In particular, petitioner asserts that his gambling losses were trade or business deductions, qualifying as deductions from gross income under section 62(1). … As a result, he argues that petitioner’s gambling loss deductions did not qualify under section 62 as deductions from gross income allowable in computing adjusted gross income.
Cited 33 timesPublished83 T.C. 162 · United States Tax Court · Aug 7, 1984
Petitioner’s surrender clearly does not constitute a loss "incurred in a trade or business” within the meaning of section 165(c)(1). … It would be anomalous, indeed, if a single act (not "netting”) could qualify as a transaction entered into for profit and yet result in a recognized loss.
Cited 7 timesPublishedEstate of Gordon v. Commissioner
70 T.C. 404 · United States Tax Court · Jun 6, 1978
If Dave’s estate carries its burden of showing, in the words of the regulation, that the order of deaths “cannot be established by proof,” it has also established, in the words of Dave’s will, that “it is doubtful” which … App. 440 , 125 N.E.2d 812, 814 (1955) (“clearly speculatory”); In re Meyer’s Estate, 276 App.
Cited 3 timesPublished89 T.C. 1123 · United States Tax Court · Dec 8, 1987
In the absence of a clearly expressed legislative intent to the contrary, 10 the language of the statute ordinarily must be regarded as conclusive. United States v. … A judgment for costs when taxed against the United States shall, in an amount established by statute, court rule, or order, be limited to reimbursing in whole or in part the prevailing party for the costs incurred by such
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna