Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,777 results
0.24s
Andrew Mitchell Berry & Sara Berry
United States Tax Court · Apr 7, 2021
Phoenix’ bank statements and QuickBooks entries establish the amounts and dates of the reported expenses, but they do not establish a business purpose. … The Court will not permit a party to a stipulation to qualify, change, or contradict that stipulation except where justice requires. Id.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished74 T.C.M. 396 · United States Tax Court · Aug 25, 1997
Prevailing Party In order to qualify as the "prevailing party", a taxpayer must establish: (1) The position of the United States in the proceeding was not substantially justified; (2) the taxpayer has substantially … Further, petitioners had raised matters that clearly implicated factual issues.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished68 T.C.M. 30 · United States Tax Court · Jul 6, 1994
Section 117(d) , which applies to education furnished after June 30, 1985, provides that gross income does not include any "qualified tuition reduction". … In affirming Knapp , the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit stated: the Regulation is clearly attempting to distinguish between tuition assistance payments that are a quid pro quo for a particular employee's services
Cited 0 timesUnpublished100 T.C.M. 288 · United States Tax Court · Sep 23, 2010
a taxpayer has not maintained business records or the taxpayer’s business records are inadequate, the Commissioner is authorized to reconstruct the taxpayer’s income by any method that, in the Commissioner’s opinion, clearly … A taxpayer must establish the basis of property for purposes of determining the amount of gain or loss the taxpayer must recognize.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished72 T.C.M. 482 · United States Tax Court · Aug 22, 1996
Edmondson's ex-wife, qualifies for tax relief as an innocent spouse pursuant to section 6013(e). Ms. … Edmondson and his first wife, qualifies for deferred recognition pursuant to section 1034.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedChristine M. Hackl v. Commissioner
118 T.C. No. 14 · United States Tax Court · Mar 27, 2002
Commissioner, 93 T.C. 181, 195 (1989) (holding that stipulations are properly disregarded where clearly contrary to evidence contained in the record). … Hence, even the first receipt of income prong has not been established on the facts before us.
Cited 0 timesUnknownESTATE OF AUGUSTA PORTER FORBES v. COMMISSIONER
81 T.C.M. 1399 · United States Tax Court · Mar 23, 2001
Section 2044 includes in the gross estate the value of all qualified terminable interest property (QTIP); i.e., property in which the decedent had a qualifying income interest for life and for which a deduction was allowed … Here, the totality of the evidence clearly shows a mutual understanding and intent that when Mr.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedEstate of Smith v. Commissioner
28 T.C.M. 127 · United States Tax Court · Feb 12, 1969
Paraphrasing the language of that case, the question here is not whether a remainder interest bequeathed to a charity has sufficient certainty to qualify as a charitable deduction available to a testator's estate but is simply … The use of this discount figure clearly *290 implies that respondent estimates no probability that capital gains will be realized (and paid out) as a result of the sale of any Smith-Douglass stock.
Cited 1 timesUnpublishedSuperior Garment Co. v. Commissioner
24 T.C.M. 1571 · United States Tax Court · Oct 26, 1965
On and prior to December 31, 1959, petitioner had in its employ a competent labor force which was qualified to produce the type, quality, and quantity of garments required by its customers. … other purpose to constitute the "principal purpose." * * * A careful scrutiny of the record in the instant case discloses that the "principal purpose" of Marianne Buchwalter and Shipley in purchasing petitioner's stock clearly
Cited 2 timesUnpublished44 T.C.M. 590 · United States Tax Court · Jul 26, 1982
from tax under section 501(a) and that it qualifies as an organization described in section 170(c)(2) . … And more clearly the research projects even before deadlines, were circulated to a number of public and private individual persons who may very well have benefited. 6.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Tax Court · Aug 8, 2024
Conn. 2009), rev’d, 666 F.3d 836 (2d Cir. 2012), in which the District Court for the District of Connecticut accepted the possibility that an entity might not “qualify as a partner under Culbertson and still . . . qualify … Petitioners argue that “accrued interest receivable [can be viewed] as an asset separate from its underlying debenture when doing so is necessary to clearly reflect a taxpayer’s income.”
Cited 0 timesUnpublished2002 T.C. Summary Opinion 56 · United States Tax Court · May 23, 2002
In order for reliance on a professional adviser to relieve a taxpayer from the negligence penalty, the taxpayer must establish that the professional adviser on whom he or she relied had the expertise and knowledge of … Petitioners clearly did not make a reasonable effort to determine whether their returns were accurate.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished43 T.C.M. 811 · United States Tax Court · Mar 22, 1982
The Supreme Court has specifically *614 upheld the validity of this regulation, stressing that "the definitions supplied by the Regulation clearly are prima facie proper, comporting as they do with the ordinary understanding … Time and again this Court has been asked to rule that payments to interns or residents are excludable from income under section 117 , and almost without exception, we have found these payments not to qualify as scholarships
Cited 0 timesUnpublished74 T.C.M. 1064 · United States Tax Court · Oct 28, 1997
Section 219(g) limits the allowable deduction where the individual is an "active participant" in a qualified retirement plan. … a qualified plan and who has adjusted gross income of less than $35,000.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished49 T.C.M. 445 · United States Tax Court · Jan 3, 1985
where she remained silent, but would fail to qualify where she actively intervened in an attempt to assure the propriety of her husband's business practices. … Moreover, petitioner offered not a shred of evidence either to establish the value of any one of these parcels, or to establish their cost, size, nature or use, such that we might reasonably assess their value.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished69 T.C.M. 1873 · United States Tax Court · Feb 8, 1995
We also concluded that petitioner did not qualify as an innocent spouse because she did not satisfy section 6013(e)(1)(C) , one of the four requirements of the innocent spouse relief provision. … During 1979 and 1980, petitioner clearly lived a very affluent lifestyle.
Cited 2 timesUnpublishedUnited States Tax Court · Jan 13, 2026
Cir. 2019) (“[T]he designation of the Administrative Record, like any established administrative procedure, is entitled to a presumption of administrative regularity.” (quoting Bar MK Ranches v. … Respondent answers petitioner’s claim that Target’s acts of abandoning the LIFO Scheme in 2009 and in renouncing LIFO in 2012 qualify as compensable acts under section 7623(b)(1).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished29 T.C.M. 481 · United States Tax Court · May 6, 1970
Wilson in South Vietnam is clearly taxable. Section 61(a), I.R.C. 1954 , defines gross income as "* * * all income from whatever source derived * * *". … Wilson did not remain in South Vietnam for an entire taxable year or for 510 days out of a period of 18 consecutive months, it is clear that his stay in South Vietnam does not qualify under either of the provisions of section
Cited 0 timesUnpublished2007 T.C. Summary Opinion 8 · United States Tax Court · Jan 17, 2007
A careful reading of the statute clearly demonstrates that the definition of “alimony” does not include a requirement that the divorce or separation instrument “designate” the payment as includable in the gross income … Appx. 126 (3d Cir. 2004), for the proposition that payments of unallocated family support do not satisfy the sec. 71(b)(1)(D) requirement and thus do not qualify as deductible alimony. 4 California law, of course
Cited 0 timesUnpublished46 T.C.M. 1341 · United States Tax Court · Sep 12, 1983
Accordingly, amounts which may have been paid to her in those years do not qualify as ordinary and necessary business expenses and are not deductible by petitioner. … In our view, the facts which have been conclusively established pursuant to respondent's *237 request for admission clearly demonstrate that petitioner fraudulently underpaid its taxes during the years in issue.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna