Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,777 results
0.79s
54 T.C.M. 11 · United States Tax Court · Aug 4, 1987
This clearly demonstrates that significant efforts were made to produce a profit from the film. … The record does not establish what part, if any, of the production budget represents qualified United States production costs.
Cited 1 timesUnpublishedJay Douglas Haskett & Cynthia S. Webb-Haskett v. Commissioner
2013 T.C. Summary Opinion 76 · United States Tax Court · Sep 26, 2013
The record does not establish that Ms. Saputa was petitioners’ qualifying relative within the meaning of section 152(d). During 2008 Ms. … MDA’s business records do not clearly explain the adjustment to Dr. Haskett’s paycheck. Because the record shows that Dr.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished70 T.C.M. 761 · United States Tax Court · Sep 21, 1995
Clearly, Congress intended to make these relief provisions available to deserving estates. Estate of McAlpine v. Commissioner , supra at 140 . … L. 97-34, sec. 421 (j)(3), 95 Stat. 313 , directs the Secretary to prescribe regulations to establish the manner in which the election is to be made.
Cited 2 timesUnpublishedJ.E. Seagram Corp. v. Commissioner
104 T.C. 75 · United States Tax Court · Jan 24, 1995
Petitioner points out that these cases hold that a sale that was not pursuant to the plan of reorganization was fatal to continuity of interest where the sale “[established an] intent to divest * * * [the old stockholders … We quote petitioner’s memorandum: The Commissioner clearly would agree that there would be insufficient continuity if the public shareholders who exchanged Conoco shares for DuPont shares sold their shares of DuPont to Seagram
Cited 7 timesPublishedSouth Penn Oil Co. v. Commissioner
17 T.C. 27 · United States Tax Court · Jul 17, 1951
An insurance company’s right to hold funds in trust is clearly recognized in that state. See section 15, Personal Property Law, N. Y. … Has petitioner established a pension trust within the meaning of section 165 of the pertinent statutes ?
Cited 0 timesPublishedCleveland Creative Arts Guild v. Comm'r
50 T.C.M. 272 · United States Tax Court · Jul 1, 1985
Petitioner's sales activities are clearly incidental to its educational activities and are but a means to the end of increasing public appreciation of the arts. Goldsboro Art League, Inc. v. Commissioner, supra. … The absence of any selection criteria does not, in our view, establish that petitioner operates for private purposes.
Cited 2 timesUnpublishedLumpkin HC, LLC, Hurricane Creek Partners, LLC, Tax Matters Partner v. Commissioner
2020 T.C. Memo. 95 · United States Tax Court · Jun 23, 2020
The word “must” clearly requires that the donee receive at least the proportionate value. PBBM-Rose Hill, Ltd. v. Commissioner, 900 F.3d at 208. … We have established above that the contribution does not qualify under section 170 as a “qualified conservation contribution” because the deed’s extinguishment clause fails to meet the requirements of the proceeds regulation
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJudith K. Blomberg v. Commissioner
2014 T.C. Summary Opinion 82 · United States Tax Court · Aug 26, 2014
Proc. 2003-61, 2003-2 C.B. 296, for determining whether a requesting spouse qualifies for relief under section 6015(f). … Although the record does not clearly establish whether Mr. Russell timely sent a copy of the notice to Ms.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished48 T.C.M. 1295 · United States Tax Court · Oct 3, 1984
established that "any amount was for an ordinary and necessary business expense, or was expended for the purpose designated." … The situation in the instant case is clearly different, and more closely parallels the numerous cases that have distinguished Foulkes on its facts. 7 The parties have stipulated that Bobye G.
Cited 3 timesUnpublishedBlossom Day Care Centers, Inc.
United States Tax Court · Jul 13, 2021
Gross income is construed broadly to include all “accessions to wealth, clearly realized, and over which the taxpayers have complete dominion.” Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426, 431 (1955). … failed to substantiate that its qualified wages paid in the years at issue exceeded the qualified wages paid in 1993.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished54 T.C.M. 332 · United States Tax Court · Aug 27, 1987
To qualify for the deduction, a taxpayer must meet three conditions: (1) The expenses must be ordinary and necessary; (2) the expenses must have been incurred while petitioners were "away from home;" and (3) petitioners must … He merely contends that petitioners have failed to establish that they were "away from home" when they incurred the expenses.
Cited 3 timesUnpublished104 T.C. 140 · United States Tax Court · Jan 30, 1995
We first look to what is clearly the most important factor— the right to control the manner and means by which the individual service provider renders the services for which compensation is being paid. 16 The Rockets wanted … It is well recognized that the extent of control necessary for a professional to qualify as an employee is less than that necessary for a nonprofessional. Professional & Executive Leasing, Inc. v.
Cited 41 timesPublishedPatricia A. Moosally v. Commissioner
142 T.C. No. 10 · United States Tax Court · Mar 27, 2014
Again, the Appeals officer concluded that the taxpayers did not qualify for a collection alternative and that the proposed levy was appropriate. Id. … It is well established that “in the absence of a ‘clearly expressed legislative intention to the contrary’, the language of the statute itself ‘must ordinarily be regarded as conclusive’.” Burlington N. R.R. Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished65 T.C. 1034 · United States Tax Court · Mar 2, 1976
A corporation having more than one class of stock does not qualify as a small business corporation. … In any event we held petitioners’ contention in this respect not to be established by the record. The corporation’s complaint sought in part damages for dissipation of its goodwill.
Cited 15 timesPublished84 T.C. 827 · United States Tax Court · May 13, 1985
If the practical effect in honoring the clearly expressed will of Congress is to grant amnesty to pre-1981 commodity tax straddlers, so be it. … Swift , J ., dissenting: The majority opinion holds that losses realized in a straddle transaction will qualify as short-term losses so long as "it can be said" that the transaction offered a prospect of a nominal profit
Reversed by Miller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 836 F.2d 1274 (1988)Cited 44 timesPublished54 T.C.M. 209 · United States Tax Court · Aug 24, 1987
Petitioner's alleged debt clearly does not fall within this criterion. … Petitioner's testimony, as well as the evidence of record, establishes that he was actually employed by Nassau County as the Superintendent of Real Estate.
Cited 3 timesUnpublishedRobert Lewis Starer & Merle Ann Starer
United States Tax Court · Dec 20, 2022
In order to qualify as an ESBT, the trust must elect to be taxed as such. … If a taxpayer’s method of accounting does not clearly reflect income, the Commissioner is authorized to impose a change on the taxpayer’s method of accounting that, in his opinion, does clearly reflect income.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedAmerican Offshore, Inc. v. Commissioner
97 T.C. 579 · United States Tax Court · Nov 25, 1991
A taxpayer need not wait for a default before taking a bad debt deduction if the debt is clearly worthless before any payments are due. Bonynge v. Helvering, supra at 158. … establishes the time at which a debt becomes worthless and thus deductible. * * * Minneapolis, St.
Cited 72 timesPublished99 T.C.M. 1005 · United States Tax Court · Jan 4, 2010
Petitioners bear the burden of proving that their gifts qualify for annual exclusions.5 See Rule 142(a); Hackl v. … The Court held that to establish entitlement to an annual exclusion under section 2503(b), a taxpayer must-- establish that the transfer in dispute conferred on the donee an unrestricted and noncontingent right
Cited 2 timesUnpublishedUnited States Tax Court · Oct 30, 2023
Moreover, because she has not established that her abode was outside the United States, she has not established that she was a “qualified individual,” within the meaning of I.R.C. § 911(d)(1), … Memo. 2015-42, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit did not clearly differentiate between the burden of production and the larger burden of proof.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna