Case law

Morgal Et Ux. v. Pinal County Board of Supervisors

510 U.S. 1180 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 7, 1994

510 U.S. 1180 Morgal et ux. v. Pinal County Board of Supervisors et al. No. 93-7436. Supreme Court of United States. March 7, 1994. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir. 2 Certiorari denied. Reported below: 993 F. 2d 883 .

Board of Trustees of the State University v. Fox

488 U.S. 815 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 3, 1988

Zielinski v. Oak Forest Police Pension Board

520 U.S. 1104 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 3, 1997

Jordan v. Kenton County Board of Education

519 U.S. 1142 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 18, 1997

Sailors v. Board of Education of Kent

385 U.S. 966 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 5, 1966

E. V. Williams Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

401 U.S. 937 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 1, 1971

Vohra v. California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

515 U.S. 1146 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 19, 1995

Damascus v. California Board of Dental Examiners

513 U.S. 1165 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 21, 1995

Granville Township Board of Trustees v. Smith

525 U.S. 979 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 4, 1998

Rivkin v. Dover Township Rent Leveling Board

519 U.S. 911 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 7, 1996

Ruston v. Town Board of Skaneateles

562 U.S. 1108 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 13, 2010

Lewis v. National Labor Relations Board

561 U.S. 1055 · Supreme Court of the United States · Sep 16, 2010

DAYTON BOARD OF EDUCATION v. BRINKMAN Et Al.

439 U.S. 1358 · Supreme Court of the United States · Sep 1, 1978

The applicant, Dayton Board of Education, has presented to me an application for stay of the judgment and mandate of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which has been denied by Mr. Justice Stewart. … Justice Stewart stated: “The applicant urges that this case be stayed because it raises many of the issues presented by Columbus Board of Education v. Penick, ante, p. 1348. Mr.

Zahl v. New Jersey Board of Medical Examiners

565 U.S. 818 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 3, 2011

Vermilya-Brown Co. v. Connell

335 U.S. 377 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 13, 1948

Connell v. Vermilya-Brown Co., 73 F. Supp. 860 . … Labor Board v. Gonzalez Padin Co., 161 F.2d 353 . [16] Defense Base Act, 56 Stat. 1035 , 42 U.S.C. § 1651 (1942).

AT&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Board

524 U.S. 949 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 26, 1998

Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Board of Equalization

287 U.S. 573 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 7, 1932

Section 237 (a), Judicial Code as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 ( 43 Stat. 936 , 937); Citizens National Bank v. Durr, 257 U. S. 99, 106, 107 ; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 4, 5, 6 . … Hugh Webster for the Board of Equalization of Tulsa County. Messrs. Ernest F. Jenkins and Guy L. Horton for the Board of County Commissioners of Payne County.

AT&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Board

523 U.S. 1135 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 26, 1998

Luckenbach Steamship Co. v. Franchise Tax Board

377 U.S. 215 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 18, 1964

Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

463 U.S. 147 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 24, 1983

It observed that our decision in NLRB v. Servette, Inc., 377 U. S. 46 (1964), had rejected a narrow reading of the proviso and that the Board had consistently construed it in an expansive manner. … NLRB v. Denver Building & Construction Trades Council, 341 U. S. 675, 692 (1951). 8 In this case, the Board did not find that any product produced by High was being distributed by DeBartolo or any of Wilson’s cotenants.