Opinion

Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Board of Equalization

  • 287 U.S. 573
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Filed
Nov 7, 1932
Status
Published
Cited by
6 cases
Authority
More cited than 94.7%

The opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeals herein are dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 ( 43 Stat. 936 , 937); Citizens National Bank v. Durr, 257 U. S. 99, 106, 107 ; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 4, 5, 6 . Treating the papers whereon the appeals in these *574 causes were allowed as petitions for writs of certiorari, § 237 (c), Judicial Code as amended ( 43 Stat. 936 , 938), consideration thereof is postponed and leave is granted to petitioners to file briefs supporting applications for certiorari within fifteen days, with ten days for opposing counsel to reply.

Messrs. John H. Miley and Wm. P. Mc-Ginnis for appellant. Mr. Hugh Webster for the Board of Equalization of Tulsa County. Messrs. Ernest F. Jenkins and Guy L. Horton for the Board of County Commissioners of Payne County.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.