Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,323 results
1.63s
187 F. Supp. 2d 260 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 1, 2002
Brown, 711 A.2d at 455; see also supra n. 11. In 1998, while Pursell’s first PCRA petition was pending before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, however, the rules changed. In Commonwealth v. … Brown, 551 Pa. 465 , 711 A.2d 444, 455 (1998) (“This Court generally applies a relaxed waiver rule in capital cases because of the permanent and irrevocable nature of the death penalty.”); Commonwealth v.
Cited 31 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 22, 2022
See Ciolli v. Iravani, 651 F. Supp. 2d 356, 369 (E.D. Pa. 2009). V. … Robinson v. Johnson, 313 F.3d 128, 134-35 (3d Cir. 2002); see also Greiser v. Drinkard, App.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDUBOIS COUNTRY CLUB, LTD v. DEPOSITORS INSURANCE COMPANY
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 10, 2023
Arbaugh v. … V.
Cited 0 timesUnknownKYKO GLOBAL, INC. v. PRITHVI INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, LTD.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 6, 2020
Shearing v. E.F. Hutton Grp., Inc., 885 F.2d 1162, 1165 (3d Cir. 1989), abrog. on other grounds by Beck v. Prupis, 529 U.S. 494 (2000) (citing R.A.G.S. Coulture, Inc. v. … In Bhongir, Kyko sued Omkar Bhongir (“Bhongir’”), a California resident who served on the board of directors of Prithvi from 2005 — 2009, claiming that he induced Kyko to enter into a fraud factoring scheme.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 2021
Yazici also served on Etimine USA’s Board of Directors. (Ud. 419). … v. White Consol.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 2020
Boag v. MacDougall, 454 U.S. 364 (1982); United States ex rel. Montgomery v. … See Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Cty. of Burlington, 621 F.3d 296, 309-11 Gd Cir. 2010); Millhouse vy. Arbasak, 373 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnknownEmerson Electric Supply Co. v. Estes Express Lines Corp.
324 F. Supp. 2d 713 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 2004
Cos., Inc. v. … Rohner Gehrig Co., Inc. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 20, 2022
From the range of circumstances that could point toward the State behind an individual face, no one fact can function as a necessary condition across the board for finding state action; nor is any set of … Auker, 700 F.3d 1180, 1191-92 (9th Cir. 2012); Brown v. Newberger, 291 F.3d 89, 93-94 (1st Cir. 2002); Thomas v. Beth Israel Hosp. Inc., 710 F. Supp. 935, 940-41 (S.D.N.Y. 1989); Haag v. Cuyahoga County, 619 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC. v. BABICH
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 3, 2024
See Directv Inc. v. Figler, Civ.A. 04- 773, 2006 WL 318825, at *1 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 9, 2006). 2 Babich cites Brader v. Allegheny Gen. … , as to the other, at any time, in any manner, directly or indirectly, make any disparaging or detrimental statements about the other to any person or entity, including but not limited to the Board
Cited 0 timesUnknown727 F. Supp. 2d 388 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 23, 2010
Anderson v. … Brown v. Byrd, No. 00-3118, 2000 WL 1780234 , at *6 (E.D.Pa. Dec. 1, 2000) (citing Montgomery v. De Simone, 159 F.3d 120, 126-27 (3d Cir.1998)).
Cited 13 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 2, 2026
See Kelly v. Drexel Univ., 94 F.3d 102, 105 Gd Cir.1996). employment decision as a result of discrimination. Brown v. Saint Vincent Health Ctr., 2022 WL 865818, at *4 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 23, 2022)(citing Sulima v. … Stucke v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 10, 2020
The facility’s Director of Nursing, Sarah Brown, witnessed the exchange and separately reported it to Lieber, stating that she was embarrassed for her colleague. Id. 63. … Spyridakis v. Riesling Group, Inc., 398 F. App’x 793, 799 (3d Cir. Oct. 1, 2010) (quoting Fraser v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. 352 F.3d 107, 111 (3d Cir. 2003)) (alteration in the original); see Hennessy v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownREYNOLDS v. SLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY OF PA
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 2, 2021
Smith v. Life Inv’rs Ins. Co. of Am., No. 2:07-CV-681, 2009 WL 2045197, at *3 (W.D. Pa. July 9, 2009) (quoting Martin v. … To that end, the Rocket article was circulated by email among the Board of Trustees at a time when the SRU administration knew or should have known that the Dickie McCamey Reports addressed a number of the issues raised
Cited 0 timesUnknownTHE LAUREL MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC v. WHITE SHEEP CORPORATION
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 2021
Gonzalez v. … Marshall v. Board of Education, Bergenfield, N.J., 575 F.2d 417, 425 (3d Cir. 1978). This limitation is significant, because it only applies to the prospective or executory application of a court’s equitable degree.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 10, 2026
v. … Brown v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Dep t of Health Emergency Med. Servs. Training Inst., 318 F.3d 473, 482 (3d Cir. 2003).
Cited 0 timesUnknownCAPITAL TELECOM HOLDINGS II LLC v. MUNICIPALITY OF BETHEL PARK, PENNSYLVANIA
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 2022
buildings/structures and where the only evidence that the tower could collapse on another building was the non-testimonial commentary of board member). … See Kaucher v. County of Bucks, 455 F.3d 418, 423 (3d Cir. 2006) (quoting Wetzel v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMALLET AND COMPANY INC. v. LACAYO
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 2025
Orbital Eng’g, Inc. v. Buchko, 2021 WL 5280927, *19 (W.D. Pa. … v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 14, 2021
See also McTernan v. … Brown v. Muhlenberg Tup., 269 F.3d 205, 217-18 (3d Cir. 2001) (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46 (1965)). See aéso Robinson □□ Railroad Passenger Corp., 821 Fed. Appx. 97, 102 (3d Cir 2020).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 2025
See also Brown v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 2025 WL 1284775, at *1 (W.D. Pa. May 2, 2025). … See, e.g., Jones v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSNYDER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 2025
Norfolk also states that Snyder received sickness and unemployment benefits from the Railroad Retirement Board (“RRB”) for the entire period he was not working. ECF No. 33, §63. … Marten v. Godwin, 499 F.3d 290, 295 (3d Cir. 2007) (quoting Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 (1986)).
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna