Case law

CONIKER v. MONFORTOH

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 13, 2022

Co. v. Wood, 592 F.3d 412, 419 (3d Cir. 2010) (citing Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Svcs. Inc., 545 U.S. 546, 553 (2005) and Kaufman v. Allstate N.J. Insur. Co., 561 F.3d 144, 148 (3d Cir.2009)). Mr. … Parkell v. Danber, 833 F.3d 313, 340 (3d Cir. 2016) (quoting Montgomery v. Pinchak, 294 F.3d 492, 498 (3d Cir. 2002)). Therefore, to the extent Mr.

Rogers v. United States

696 F. Supp. 2d 472 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 2010

See Waterman v. Farmer, 183 F.3d 208, 213 (3d Cir.1999); Whitney v. Brown, 882 F.2d 1068, 1071 (6th Cir.1989). The Turner analysis is exceedingly fact-intensive. See Wolf v. … See also Brothers v. Lawrence County Prison Board, 2008 WL 146828 , at *5 (W.D.Pa.

OROBIO-ESTACIO v. ICE

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 2025

Barradas Jacome v. Att'y Gen. United States, 39 F.4th 111, 116–17 (3d Cir. 2022), cert. denied sub nom. Barradas-Jacome v. Garland, 143 S. Ct. 2432, 216 L. … The boarding team received authorization to treat the vessel as a vessel without nationality and therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, and removed Orobio-Estacio, a Colombian national, and two

THE PR LIQUIDATING TRUST v. WESTERN LAND SERVICES, INC

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 2021

Dalrymple v. Brown, 549 Pa. 217, 701 A.2d 164, 167 (1997). … Weik v. Estate of Brown, 794 A.2d 907, 909 (Pa. Super. 2002); see also id. at 911 (“Clearly, the recording statute has been given effect beyond determining priority of title.

CLEAN AIR COUNCIL v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATOIN

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 14, 2020

For example, the Clean Air Act created the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, and charged that Board with “establish[ing] by regulation requirements binding on persons for reporting accidental releases into … the ambient air subject to the Board’s investigatory jurisdiction.” 42 U.S.C. § 7412(r)(6)(C)(iii).

J.N. v. Pittsburgh City School District

536 F. Supp. 2d 564 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 25, 2008

Oberti v. Board of Educ. of Borough of Clementon Sch. Dist., 995 F.2d 1204, 1213 (3d Cir.1993). … .”); W.G. v. Board of Trustees of Target Range Sch. Dist. No. 23, 960 F.2d 1479, 1484 (9th Cir.1992); Thomas v. Cincinnati Bd. of Ed., 918 F.2d 618, 625 (6th Cir.1990) (same); Roland M. v. Concord Sch.

Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Intersteel, Inc.

758 F. Supp. 1054 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 15, 1990

In College Watercolor Group, Inc., v. William H. … See Village at Camelback v. Carr, 371 Pa.Super. at 461 , 538 A.2d at 533 ; Reverse Vending Associates v. Tomra Systems U.S., Inc., 655 F.Supp. 1122 (E.D.Pa.1987); Parker v.

SMITH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 2025

See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1153-54 (2019); Jesurum v. Secretary of U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs, 48 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Brown v. … See also Berry v. Sullivan, 738 F. Supp. 942, 944 (W.D.

WEBER v. ERIE COUNTY

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 2020

Corliss v. O'Brien, 200 Fed. Appx. 80, 84 (3d Cir. 2006); see also Blakeney v. Marsico, 340 Fed. Appx. 778 (3d Cir. 2009). … Ohio 1985) (holding that “all the [judge’s] acts ... could have been appealed either directly or by extraordinary writ” and therefore plaintiff had an adequate remedy at law despite judicial immunity); cf Brown v.

Bowles v. Weiss

66 F. Supp. 366 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1946

Heinz et al. v. Bowles, Em.App.. 149 F.2d 277 ; Bowles v. Hurwitz, D.C., 58 F.Supp. 1 ; Armour & Co. v. Bowles, Em.App., 148 F.2d 529 ; Bowles v. Swift & Co., D.C., 56 F.Supp.679; Montgomery Ward & Co. v. … Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp., 7 Cir., 149 F.2d 545 ; Brown v. Conner, D.C., 63 F. Supp. 315 , and Bowles, Price Administrator, v. Hall and Bowles v. Holliday, D.C., 62 F.Supp. 486 .

Rogan v. Giant Eagle, Inc.

113 F. Supp. 2d 777 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 21, 2000

v. … Rush, 113 F.3d at 482 (quoting Berry v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State Univ., 715 F.2d 971, 981 (5th Cir.1983)).

A.J. Cunningham Packing Corp. v. Congress Financial Corp.

611 F. Supp. 532 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 28, 1985

See Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478, 483-84 , 100 S.Ct. 1790 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980); Polite v. Diehl, 507 F.2d 119, 122 (3d Cir.1974) [en banc). … D’Iorio v. Adonizio, 554 S.Supp. 222 (M.D.Pa.1982), relied on Sharp v.

United Mine Workers of America v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.

378 F. Supp. 1206 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 19, 1974

Willis gave a false written statement about an altercation which occurred between himself and the individual plaintiffs during a work stoppage, which statement was admitted into evidence before a joint board hearing, that … Robbins Co. v. Airportels, Inc., supra; Keller v. Local 247 of Int. Bro. of Teamsters, supra, and the common law rule is that an action is not barred by the passage of time. Hauenstein v.

Morrison v. Fox

483 F. Supp. 390 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 1979

Morrison was dressed in levis, boots and a shirt, and was wearing a brown hat. … In Carey v.

Hartwell v. Allied Chemical Corp.

320 F. Supp. 75 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 1970

As stated in Venezia v. Phila. … In Boal v.

Maksin v. United Steel Workers of America

136 F. Supp. 2d 375 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 2000

Ford Motor Co. v. … Western United Life Assurance Co. v. Hayden, 64 F.3d 833, 837 (3d Cir.1995), citing Allegheny Int’l v.

J.R. v. GREATER LATROBE SCHOOL DISTRICT

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 29, 2022

Sanford v. Stiles, 456 F.3d 298, 314 (3d Cir.2006) (citing Brown v. Pa. Dep’t of Health Emergency Med. Servs. Training Inst., 318 F.3d 473, 482 (3d Cir.2003)). … Brown, 318 F.3d at 482.

Harding v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance

809 F. Supp. 2d 403 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 19, 2011

See Brown v. The Paul Revere Life Ins. Co., No. Civ.A. 01-1931, 2002 WL 1019021 , at *7 (E.D.Pa. … Harrow, 279 F.3d at 249 (quoting Brown v. Cont’l Baking Co., 891 F.Supp. 238, 241 (E.D.Pa.1995)).

MERCADO ROSARIO v. UNDERWOOD

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 2025

Ct. 2768, 2774 (“We hold that the requirements of due process are satisfied if some evidence supports the decision by the prison disciplinary board to revoke good time credits.”); see also Gorbey v. … Warden Lewisburg USP, 2025 WL 342189, *1, n.1 (3d Cir. 2025) (citing Reese v. Warden Phila.

SAYERS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 31, 2023

See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1153-54 (2019); Jesurum v. Secretary of U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs, 48 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Brown v. … See also Berry v. Sullivan, 738 F. Supp. 942, 944 (W.D.