Case law

Pennsylvania v. Flaherty

760 F. Supp. 472 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1991

Board of Education v. Dowell, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 630, 636 , 112 L.Ed.2d 715 (1991). Here we must decide whether or not the preliminary injunction issued by Judge Weber must be dissolved. II. … No additional showing of “grievous wrong evoked by new and unforeseen conditions” is required of the school board. of Board of Education v. Dowell, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 630, 636-37 , 112 L.Ed.2d 715 (1991).

BELL v. LITTLE

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 5, 2024

See, e.g., Smolko v. Unimark v. Lowboy Trans., LLC, 327 F.R.D. 59, 63 (M.D. Pa. 2018); King v. Mansfield Univ. of Pennsylvania, No. 1:11-CV-1112, 2014 WL 563323, at *3 n. 1 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 11, 2014); M.S. v. … Brown Christopher B. Brown United States Magistrate Judge

Pittsburgh Die Sinkers Lodge No. 50 v. Pittsburgh Forgings Co.

255 F. Supp. 142 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 16, 1966

Ltd. v. N.L.R.B., 321 F.2d 397 (9th Cir. 1963); N.L.R.B. v. Robert S. Abbott Publishing Co., 331 F.2d 209 (7th Cir. 1964). … Consolidated Tile and Slate Co. v. Fox, 410 Pa. 336 , 189 A.2d 228 (1963).

Bey v. Williams

590 F. Supp. 1150 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 1984

On the same date, these Plaintiffs also filed charges with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”). The NLRB subsequently dismissed the charges. … See Metz v.

United States ex rel. Hart v. Maroney

230 F. Supp. 468 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 22, 1964

Brown v. Allen, 1953, 344 U.S. 443, 474-476 , 73 S.Ct. 397, 416-417 , 97 L.Ed. 469 ; Stroble v. State of California, 1952, 343 U.S. 181, 196-198 , 72 S.Ct. 599, 606-607 [ 96 L.Ed. 872 ]; Gallegos v. … Melton v.

BURMUDEZ-RODRIGUEZ v. CHANG

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 2025

Bookwalter v. Keen, No. 1:CV-15-1291, 2015 WL 7294462, at *1 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 19, 2015). See also Porter v. … .”); Muhammad v. U.S. Marshals Serv., 385 F.

Zeltzer v. Carte Blanche Corp.

375 F. Supp. 717 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 1974

Section 226.7 of Regulation Z, the interpretation of TILA issued by the Federal Reserve Board of Governors under their mandate from Congress to prescribe regulations to effectuate the purposes of the Act ( 15 U.S.C. § 1604 … As held in Bone v. Hibernia Bank, 493 F.2d 135 , (9th Cir. 1974), the deference due an administrative agency’s construction of its own regulations requires court approval of a Regulation Z interpretation.

Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Federal Insurance

884 F. Supp. 979 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 1995

During the relevant time period, the six members of the Board of Directors of Giant Eagle also comprised the majority of the Board of Directors of Phar-Mor. … Co., 507 F.2d 1332, 1337 (3d Cir.1975) (clear and convincing evidence required for reformation); Central Transportation, Inc. v. Board of Assessment Appeals, 490 Pa. 486 , 417 A.2d 144, 147-48 (1980) (same); Blair v.

INGRAM v. SCI SMITHFIELD

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 2022

Horan/ v. ) Magistrate Judge Patricia L. … Rieco v. Moran, 2015 WL 1898140 (W.D. Pa. 2015); Okey v. Strebig, 2012 WL 5439042 (M.D. Pa. 2012); Alexander v. Fritsch, 2010 WL 1257709 (W.D. Pa. 2010); Bullock v. Horn, 2000 WL 1839171 (M.D. Pa. 2000).

In re Torchia

185 F. 576 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 1, 1911

Knoll v. Railway Company, 121 Pa. 467 , 15 Atl. 571 , 1 L. R. A. 366. A right of damages for a change of grade is a personal claim and does not pass with the subsequent sale of the lauds. Campbell v. … Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania Schuylkill Valley Ry. Co., 151 Pa. 569 , 25 Atl. 177 .

MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION v. LOMBARDI

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 2020

In late 2018, two more former Matthews employees, Christopher Brown and James Norton, went to work for Implant. [ECF 1, p. 25, ¶ 137]. … Brown and Norton. [ECF 38-2, Ex. C]. Ultimately, Matthews decided not to pursue legal action over Messrs. Brown and Norton. On December 3, 2019, shortly after Messrs.

KLANCHAR v. UPPER YODER TOWNSHIP SUPERVISORS

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 2025

for how a member of the public may go about addressing the Board. … On February 15, 2024, Plaintiff attended an Upper Yoder Township Board of Supervisors (the “Board’”) meeting where he was slated to have approximately three minutes to address the Board.

United States v. Cook

311 F. Supp. 618 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1970

. § 462(a). 1 The indictment charges thát on or about August 26, 1968, the defendant, a registrant with Local Board No. 87 at New Castle, Pennsylvania, did wilfully and knowingly fail to report for and submit to induction … United States v. O’Brien, 391 U.S. 367 , 88 S.Ct. 1673 , 20 L.Ed.2d 672 (1968), rehearing denied 393 U.S. 900 , 89 S.Ct. 63 , 21 L.Ed.2d 188 (1968); United States v. Robel, supra; Lichter v.

Mensah

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 2026

Mensah acknowledges that he filed an appeal with the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), including the issue of his detention under § 1226 (ECF No. 1 at 2, 4-5), and that appeal remains pending (ECF No. 13-5). … In Borbot v. Warden Hudson County Corrections Facility, 906 F.3d 274, 276 (3d Cir. 2018), the court denied a similar request from a petitioner being held in discretionary detention under § 1226(a).

Calhoun v. Foerster

656 F. Supp. 492 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1987

Draper v. Washington, 372 U.S. 487 , 83 S.Ct. 774 , 9 L.Ed.2d 899 (1963); Griffin v. People of State of Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 , 76 S.Ct. 585 , 100 L.Ed. 891 (1956). Only last Term, in Long v. … See Elliot v. Weinberger, 564 F.2d 1219 (9th Cir.1977), aff’d in part, rev’d on other grounds sub nom, Califano v.

TODD v. BERRYHILL

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 2019

Sullivan, 970 F.2d 1178, 1182 (3d Cir. 1992), cert. denied sub nom., 507 U.S. 924 (1993); Brown v. Bowen, 845 F.2d 1211, 1213 (3d Cir. 1988). See also Berry v. Sullivan, 738 F. Supp. 942, 944 (W.D. … Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 197 n. 2 (3d Cir.2011). State agent opinions merit significant consideration as well. Chandler v. Comm’r of Soc.

SARKISOV v. UNDERWOOD

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 5, 2025

See, e.g., Queen v. Miner, 530 F.3d 253, 254 (3d Cir. 2008); Barden v. Keohane, 921 F.2d 476, 478-79 (3d Cir. 1990); see also Dababneh v. Warden Loretto FCI, 792 Fed. Appx. 149, 150 n.2 (3d Cir. 2019). B. … Institution v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 455-56 (1985) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also Denny v.

FISK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 31, 2021

Ct. 1148, 1153-54 (2019); Jesurum v. Secretary of U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs, 48 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Brown v. Bowen, 845 F.2d 1211, 1213 (3d Cir. 1988)). See also Berry v. Sullivan, 738 F. … Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 197 n. 2 (3d Cir.2011). State agent opinions merit significant consideration as well.

Meyer v. Nicholson

441 F. Supp. 2d 735 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 26, 2006

Thus, it must be determined “ ‘whether the evidence presents a sufficient disagreement to require submission to a jury or whether it is so one-sided that one party must prevail as a matter of law.’ ” Brown v. … Weston v.

ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY v. STEPHENSON

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 2024

Co. v. George V. Hamilton, Inc., 571 F.3d 299, 311 (3d Cir. 2009). … V.