Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspawd

4,323 results

1.25s

  • Washington Coal & Coke Co. v. Heiner

    42 F.2d 681 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 16, 1930

    In Stange v. United States, C. C. H. … Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C. C. A. 6th Cir.) 38 F.(2d) 425 , paragraph 668, vol. 1, 1930 P. H. Fed. Tax Service.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. Crews

    755 F. Supp. 2d 666 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 2010

    Co. v. … Bank v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • BROOKS AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 8, 2020

    As noted by the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, “the Board of Vehicles Act does not define the terms ‘unreasonable’ or ‘reasonable.’” Rohrich Cadillac, Inc. v. … Grp, Ltd. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • WOODARD v. EVANS

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 10, 2023

    Atkins v. Borough of Phoenixville, 336 F. Supp. 3d 511, 520 (E.D. Pa. 2018). The Board of Elections argues that Mr. Woodard has not made out a substantive due process claim and this Court agrees. First, Mr. … See Hardwick v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • RICHARDS

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 14, 2026

    Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). … Brown United States Magistrate Judge

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wildi v. ALLE-KISKI MEDICAL CENTER

    659 F. Supp. 2d 640 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 18, 2009

    See EEOC v. … In Stopka v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • CARMICHAEL

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 2026

    In support of this assertion, he cites only to a United States Supreme Court case, Morrissey v. … Petitioner has not been taken into custody by the USPC and, as the Supreme Court explained in Moody v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Allen v. Washington Hospital

    34 F. Supp. 2d 958 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 12, 1999

    Thomas, its President and CEO, John Frazier, M.D., a member of the Board of Trustees and a staff member, and Nell Hart, M.D., a staff member. … As to the first assertion, the record suggests that Frazier, as a member of the Hospital’s Board, voted in favor of the Moratorium.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • MARSHALL v. GEO RIVERS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 4, 2025

    Brown v. Philip Morris Inc., 250 F.3d 789, 800 (3d Cir. 2001). Marshall’s other grievances against the Federal Defendants do not—and cannot—make out violations of the First or Fifth Amendments. … Institutional Inmates v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • SARKISOV v. UNDERWOOD

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 5, 2025

    See, e.g., Queen v. Miner, 530 F.3d 253, 254 (3d Cir. 2008); Barden v. Keohane, 921 F.2d 476, 478-79 (3d Cir. 1990); see also Dababneh v. Warden Loretto FCI, 792 Fed. Appx. 149, 150 n.2 (3d Cir. 2019). B. … Institution v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 455-56 (1985) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also Denny v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Zeltzer v. Carte Blanche Corp.

    375 F. Supp. 717 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 1974

    Section 226.7 of Regulation Z, the interpretation of TILA issued by the Federal Reserve Board of Governors under their mandate from Congress to prescribe regulations to effectuate the purposes of the Act ( 15 U.S.C. § 1604 … As held in Bone v. Hibernia Bank, 493 F.2d 135 , (9th Cir. 1974), the deference due an administrative agency’s construction of its own regulations requires court approval of a Regulation Z interpretation.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Federal Insurance

    884 F. Supp. 979 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 1995

    During the relevant time period, the six members of the Board of Directors of Giant Eagle also comprised the majority of the Board of Directors of Phar-Mor. … Co., 507 F.2d 1332, 1337 (3d Cir.1975) (clear and convincing evidence required for reformation); Central Transportation, Inc. v. Board of Assessment Appeals, 490 Pa. 486 , 417 A.2d 144, 147-48 (1980) (same); Blair v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • BELL v. LITTLE

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 5, 2024

    See, e.g., Smolko v. Unimark v. Lowboy Trans., LLC, 327 F.R.D. 59, 63 (M.D. Pa. 2018); King v. Mansfield Univ. of Pennsylvania, No. 1:11-CV-1112, 2014 WL 563323, at *3 n. 1 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 11, 2014); M.S. v. … Brown Christopher B. Brown United States Magistrate Judge

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In re Torchia

    185 F. 576 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 1, 1911

    Knoll v. Railway Company, 121 Pa. 467 , 15 Atl. 571 , 1 L. R. A. 366. A right of damages for a change of grade is a personal claim and does not pass with the subsequent sale of the lauds. Campbell v. … Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania Schuylkill Valley Ry. Co., 151 Pa. 569 , 25 Atl. 177 .

    Reversed on other grounds by In re Torchia, 188 F. 207 (1911)Cited 24 timesPublished
  • United States ex rel. Buszka v. Sielaff

    386 F. Supp. 1056 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 26, 1974

    The attorney for Buszka argues that Gray v. … Sielaff, 483 F.2d 508 (3d Cir. 1972); Braxton v. Carlson, 483 F.2d 933 (3d Cir. 1973); see Ford v. Board of Managers of New Jersey State Prison, 407 F.2d 937 (3d Cir. 1969); Gray v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Parson

    599 F. Supp. 2d 592 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 25, 2009

    Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603-05 , 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2262 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416, 427 (1975). The government has the burden of showing admissibility in that the primary taint was purged. Id. … Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603-04 , 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2262 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416, 427 (1975). In this matter, any attenuation between Parson’s statements and the Fourth Amendment violation is limited.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • INGRAM v. SCI SMITHFIELD

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 2022

    Horan/ v. ) Magistrate Judge Patricia L. … Rieco v. Moran, 2015 WL 1898140 (W.D. Pa. 2015); Okey v. Strebig, 2012 WL 5439042 (M.D. Pa. 2012); Alexander v. Fritsch, 2010 WL 1257709 (W.D. Pa. 2010); Bullock v. Horn, 2000 WL 1839171 (M.D. Pa. 2000).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Cook

    311 F. Supp. 618 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1970

    . § 462(a). 1 The indictment charges thát on or about August 26, 1968, the defendant, a registrant with Local Board No. 87 at New Castle, Pennsylvania, did wilfully and knowingly fail to report for and submit to induction … United States v. O’Brien, 391 U.S. 367 , 88 S.Ct. 1673 , 20 L.Ed.2d 672 (1968), rehearing denied 393 U.S. 900 , 89 S.Ct. 63 , 21 L.Ed.2d 188 (1968); United States v. Robel, supra; Lichter v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • HAYES v. TICE

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 2024

    Brown and Starr left. … Brown v. DiGuglielmo, No. 07-3465, 2007 WL 4242266, at *1 n.2 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 29, 2007) (citing Williams v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hoffman Electric, Inc. v. Emerson Electric Co.

    800 F. Supp. 1279 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1992

    In our previous opinion in this case, Hoffman Electric, Inc. v. … The board had authorized them to pay up to $12 million.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.