Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,323 results
0.70s
Metallurgical Exoproducts Corp. v. Pittsburgh Metals Purifying Co.
393 F. Supp. 1104 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 30, 1975
Gaddis v. Calgon Corporation, 506 F.2d 880 (5th Cir., 1975). … Kahn v. Dynamics Corporation of America, 508 F.2d 939 (2nd Cir., 1975).
Cited 4 timesPublished125 F. Supp. 314 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 1954
Pursuant to the mandate of the Court of Appeals in Taylor v. Crain, 3 Cir., 1952, 195 F.2d 163 , reversing, D.C., 98 F.Supp. 149 , and our practice in Slepski v. … Dravo Corp., D.C.W.D.Pa.1951, 104 F.Supp. 89 , and Crumrine v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedAlgemene Bank Nederland, N v. v. Hallwood Industries, Inc.
133 B.R. 176 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 30, 1991
Contra, Teachers Ins. and Annuity Ass’n of America v. Butler, 803 F.2d 61 , 65 (2d Cir.1986); Otoe County National Bank v. … See Credit Alliance Corp. v. Williams, 851 F.2d 119, 121 (4th Cir.1988), and Browning Seed, Inc. v. Bayles, 812 F.2d 999 (5th Cir.1987). In A.H.
Cited 5 timesPublishedRodgers v. Conemaugh & Black Lick Railroad
137 F. Supp. 467 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 27, 1956
At about 3:30 p. m. on October 3,1954, plaintiff attempted to board one of the ladle cars. … Co. v. United States, 3 Cir., 191 F. 1 ; Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. Co. v. United States, 8 Cir., 211 F. 12 ; Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. United States, 8 Cir., 189 F.2d 749 ; Brady v. Terminal R. Ass’n of St.
Cited 7 timesPublished327 F. Supp. 99 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 1971
Stapf v. United States, supra; Huber v. United States, 390 F.2d 544 (5th Cir. 1968); Ashworth v. United States, 391 F.2d 245 (6th Cir. 1968); Lee v. United States, supra; Holt v. … Therefore, the sentences shall run concurrently and you too may be released on parole at the discretion of the parole board.” 1 Even following the minority view of the Fourth Circuit, there is no legal basis for affording
Cited 0 timesPublishedSanders v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
872 F. Supp. 216 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 1994
(quoting North Carolina State Board of Education v. Swann, 402 U.S. 43, 46 , 91 S.Ct. 1284, 1286 , 28 L.Ed.2d 586 (1971)). … V.
Cited 1 timesPublished574 F. Supp. 568 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 1983
See Cohen v. United States, 297 F.2d 760 (9th Cir.1962); Ellingburg v. Connett, 457 F.2d 240 (5th Cir.1972); Ott v. U.S. Board of Parole, 324 F.Supp. 1034 (W.D.Mo.1971); U.S. ex rel. Harrison v. … In Ferri v. U.S.
Cited 2 timesPublished316 F. Supp. 846 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 14, 1970
Blakeslee v. United States, 1 Cir., 32 F.2d 15, 17 ; United States v. Radov, 3 Cir., 44 F.2d 155, 157 ; Brink v. United States, 6 Cir., 60 F.2d 231, 234 ; Wood v. … Brown v. New Jersey, 175 U.S. 172 , 20 S.Ct. 77 , 44 L.Ed. 119 [1899]. Extensive voir dire has its dangers. How else but in an extended voir dire examination in the Pryor case was it learned that the juror Mrs.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBall v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.
4 F.R.D. 194 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 27, 1944
Co. v. James B. Berry Sons Co., D.C., 1 F.R.D. 163, 165 ; Hartford-Empire Co. v. Glenshaw Glass Co., D.C., 4 F.R.D. 210 ; Stewart-Warner Corporation v. Staley, D.C., 2 F.R.D. 199 ; Knox v. Alter, D.C., 2 F.R.D. 337 . … This interrogatory requests a statement of what representations were made by this defendant to the War Production Board with respect to the need of any additional theatre in Am-bridge.
Cited 9 timesPublishedSaus v. Delta Concrete Company
368 F. Supp. 297 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 1974
Crawford v. Pope & Talbot Inc., 206 F.2d 784 (3d Cir. 1953); Brown v. American-Hawaiian S.S. Co., 211 F.2d 16 (3d Cir. 1954). In other circuits, however, the Halcyon doctrine has not met with such unswerving acceptance. … Gooden v.
Cited 4 timesPublished304 F. Supp. 966 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 13, 1969
National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951), we “may not substitute * * * [our] inferences for those of the referee which are supported by substantial evidence.” Ferenz v. … Bujnovsky v. Celebrezze, supra. See: Tinsley v. Finch, 300 F.Supp. 247, 254-256 (D.S.C.1969); Huffman v. Gardner, 292 F.Supp. 331, 333 (D.Ore.1968). Cf. Wright v. Gardner, 403 F.2d 646, 647 (7th Cir. 1968).
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 2025
. § 405(g); Biestek v. Berryhill, 587 U.S. 97 (2019); Jesurum v. Secretary of U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs, 48 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Brown v. Bowen, 845 F.2d 1211, 1213 (3d Cir. 1988)). … See, e.g., Skolny v. Bisignano, 2025 WL 1462570, at *6 (M.D. Pa. May 21, 2025).
Cited 0 timesUnknownPension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. Greene
570 F. Supp. 1483 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1983
of the Board of Directors of Bollinger. … In Rosen v.
Cited 29 timesPublished988 F. Supp. 2d 511 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 2013
Geneva is governed by a board of corporators and a board of trustees. (ECF Nos. 91 at 4; 98 ¶¶ 30, 33.) … Members of the board of corporators must be members of the RPCNA and members of the board of trustees must be members of either the RPCNA or some other Reformed or Evangelical Christian congregation. (Id.)
Cited 8 timesPublished170 F. Supp. 941 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 1959
United States v. Sawyer, 3 Cir., 210 F.2d at page 170 .” … A particular apt expression from United States v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedVallerey Stylianoudis v. Westinghouse Credit Corp.
785 F. Supp. 530 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 1992
See Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a); Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsberg State College, 590 F.2d 470 , 492 (3d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979). … James v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedGeorge v. Hillman Transportation Company
340 F. Supp. 296 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 1972
In Mroz v. … American Barge Line, 169 F.2d 61 [3rd Cir., 1948]; Brown v. Dravo Corp., 258 F.2d 704 [3rd Cir., 1968]. The obligation is a continuous one, and each day’s claim may be sued on individually.
Cited 10 timesPublishedRecchion v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
606 F. Supp. 889 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 25, 1985
In Blue Chip Stamps v. … See Zerman v. Ball, 735 F.2d 15, 22 (2nd Cir.1984); Decker v. Massey-Ferguson, Ltd., 681 F.2d 111, 114 (2nd Cir.1982); Cramer v.
Cited 10 timesPublished14 F.R.D. 67 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 1953
directors of a bank are liable for only the official mismanagement which occurs during the time of their directorship, and that the fiduciary relationship between a bank and its directors ceases when the latter leave the board … United States v. Bize, D.C., 86 F.Supp. 939 ; Samuel Goldwyn, Inc., v. United Artists Corp., D.C., 35 F. Supp. 633 ; French v. French Paper Company, D.C., 1 F.R.D. 531 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedMEHNERT v. AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 2020
discussing the boards. … Hugh v. Butler Cnty. Family YMCA, 418 F.3d 265, 267 (3d Cir. 2005) (citing Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323-24 (1986)).
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna