Case law

GALLAGHER v. CENTRAL VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 2024

See Ezold v. … Shelton v.

In re Westinghouse Securities Litigation

832 F. Supp. 948 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 27, 1993

Lazard allegedly also prepared a document for use at the February 27, 1991 board meeting entitled Westinghouse Electric — Board Meeting Q & A, and which read as follows: Q: Are the reserves adequate? … In Rochez Bros., Inc. v.

Lee v. United States Government

497 F. Supp. 180 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 1980

Sherbert v. … The Court in Sherbert distinguishes its decision from Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599 , 81 S.Ct. 1144 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 (1961); the comparison is relevant here.

Potts v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.

272 F. Supp. 3d 690 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 2017

James Boscardin, M.D., Board Certified Orthopedic Surgery, and Dr. Brian Peck, M.D., Board Certified Rheuma-tology. (ECF No. 63 at 13.) None of these physicians is licensed to practice medicine in Pennsylvania. Dr. … Plaintiff cites Miller v. Am.

Pittsburgh Press Club v. United States

388 F. Supp. 1269 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 1975

S. v. Ft. … Dues may be changed by the Board of Directors but not more than 25% up or down in any one year. Art. V, sec. 9. 6 . GX-5 7 . William J. Steinbach, of station KDKA. 8 . See PX-2. 9 .

Wobb v. Ford Motor Co.

76 F.R.D. 452 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 1977

COUNT VII This count involves plaintiff’s termination of employment under the Management Contract by Holiday’s Board of Directors at the parent corporation’s suggestion. … See First National Bank of Arizona v. *456 Cities Service Co., 391 U.S. 253 , 88 S.Ct. 1575 , 20 L.Ed.2d 569 (1968); Tripoli Company v. Wella Corporation, 425 F.2d 932 (3 Cir. 1970); Gasperi v.

Wittekamp v. Gulf & Western, Inc.

788 F. Supp. 246 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 1992

In Celotex v. … Matthews v. Ashland Chemical, Inc., 703 F.2d 921 (5th Cir.1983); Frey v. Woodard, 748 F.2d 173 (3d Cir.1984). Plaintiff cannot prevail on the motion presently before the court.

XU v. DHS/ICE OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 2023

Xu appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (the Board). The Board affirmed the Immigration Judge’s decision on November 26, 2021. ECF No. 1-1, at 6-7. Ms. … Duarte v. Mayorkas, 27 F.4th 1044, 1054–55 (5th Cir. 2022) (quoting Martinez v. Napolitano, 704 F.3d 620, 623 (9th Cir. 2012)).

Huge v. Long's Hauling Company, Inc.

442 F. Supp. 1041 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 8, 1977

Any conduct which is even arguably a § 8 violation must first be brought before the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) before it can be asserted here. San Diego Building Trades Council, etc. v. … See Huge v. Old Home Manor, Inc., 419 F.Supp. 1019 (D.C.Pa.1976).

Premier Comp Solutions LLC v. UPMC

163 F. Supp. 3d 268 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 18, 2016

Brown Shoe Co. v. U.S., 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). … Brown Shoe Co. v. U.S., 370 U.S. at 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 ; Tunis Bros. Co., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 952 F.2d 715, 722 (3d Cir.1991).

Lowe v. Columbian Nat. Life Ins.

2 F. Supp. 99 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 1932

A. 3), opinion by Judge Woolley, wherein Walker v. Brown, 165 U. S. 654 , 17 S. Ct. 453 , 41 L. Ed. 865 , and Ingexsoll v. Coram, 211 U. S. 335 , 29 S. Ct. 92 , 53 L. Ed. 208 aro followed. … The decisions cited in the opinions, Walker v. Brown and Ingersoll v.

MORELLI v. ARMSTRONG SCHOOL DISTRICT

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 13, 2025

Brown v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 723 F. Supp. 3d 411, 422 (E.D. Pa. 2024) (quoting Martin-McFarlane v. City of Philadelphia, 299 F. Supp. 3d 658, 670 (E.D. … .”); Brown v. Att’y Gen., 204 F.

Lechtner v. Brownyard

522 F. Supp. 675 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 22, 1981

Plaintiff, a resident and businessman in North East, Pennsylvania, was a member of the North East District School Board. … United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715 , 86 S.Ct. 1130 , 16 L.Ed.2d 218 (1966); Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397 , 9 S.Ct. 1207 , 25 L.Ed.2d 442 (1970). We find that the court had jurisdiction. II.

BECK v. BROOKVILLE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, INC.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 2, 2021

See Lawrence v. … There is no evidence that the Board conducted an independent investigation or review of Beck’s performance. See Walden v.

United States v. Conley

856 F. Supp. 1010 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1994

Horton [v. California ], 496 U.S. [128], at 133-34, 110 S.Ct. [2301], 2305-2306 [ 110 L.Ed.2d 112 ]; [Texas v. ] Brown, 460 U.S. [730], at 739, 103 S.Ct. [1535], at 1541 [ 75 L.Ed.2d 502 ] (opinion of REHNQUIST, J.). … Id., at 134 , 110 S.Ct., at 2306 ; see also Brown, supra, 460 U.S., at 739 , 103 S.Ct., at 1541 (opinion of REHNQUIST, J.).

DOE 1 v. NORTH ALLEGHENY SCHOOL DISTRICT

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 2022

The Supreme Court has articulated a test in Fry v. … PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin, 532 U.S. 661, 675 (2001).

Cooper v. Valley Line Co.

320 F. Supp. 483 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 1970

Ungrund v. Cunningham Brothers, Inc., 300 F.Supp. 270, 272 (S.D.Ill.1969). … The accident allegedly occurred on board a vessel as a result of a faulty loudspeaker, dirty window, and slippery monkey bar.

United States v. Jarrett

334 F. Supp. 2d 810 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 2, 2004

See Santana v. … See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 80 Fed.Appx. 796 (3d Cir.2002) (sentencing imposed in accordance with USSG was legal); United States v.

LURIA BROS. & CO., INC. v. Allen

452 F. Supp. 732 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 11, 1978

At that time he was also a member of the Board of Directors of Bollinger. Greene at the time was an officer of Bollinger and a member of its Board of Directors. … Ragin v. Schwartz, 393 F.Supp. 152 (W.D.Pa.1975).

MILLER v. CITY OF BRADFORD

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 9, 2019

Counts I and II assert violations of Plaintiff’s federal procedural due 1 See Cleveland Board of Educ. v. … Alvin v.