Case law

Smith v. Duquesne University

612 F. Supp. 72 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 28, 1985

The university’s corporate board of directors, responsible for oversight and management of the corporation, are elected by members of the corporation. … .”); Allen v. State Board of Electons, 393 U.S. 544, 554-55 , 89 S.Ct. 817, 825-26 , 22 L.Ed.2d 1 (1969) (“no person shall be denied the right to vote____”); Tunstall v.

Langston v. United States

310 F. Supp. 147 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 1970

As stated in Smith v. … See also: Clark v. Blackwell, 374 F.2d 952 (5th Cir. 1967); McKinney v. Taylor, 358 F.2d 689 (10th Cir. 1966).

Oswald v. Veeder Root Co.

662 F. Supp. 952 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 1987

Board of Governors of State Colleges and Universities, 549 F.Supp. 225 (N.D.Ill.1982) (letter received by plaintiffs mom, given to plaintiff next day. Time begins to run on actual receipt by plaintiff). … Espinoza v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co., 754 F.2d 1247 (5th Cir.1985). An apt illustration is provided by Franks v.

United States v. Moses

360 F. Supp. 301 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 18, 1973

See United States v. Bonham, 477 F.2d 1137 (3d Cir., filed April 2, 1973); United States v. Bethea, 143 U.S.App.D.C. 68 , 442 F.2d 790 (1971); Bettis v. United States, 408 F.2d 563 (9th Cir. 1969); Murray v. … See United States v. Davis, 461 F.2d 1026 (3d Cir. 1972); Riley v. United States, 411 F.2d 1146 (9th Cir. 1969); United States v. Jackson, 423 F.2d 506 (9th Cir. 1970).

Townend v. Cohen

296 F. Supp. 789 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 1969

v. … Bujnovsky v. Celebrezze, supra. Cf. Janek v. Celebrezze, supra; Hodgson v. Celebrezze, supra.

BINGAMAN

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 28, 2026

See, e.g., Bond v. Kirby, Civ. Action No. 16-4027, 2017 WL 1352217, at *4 (D.N.J. … Apr. 10, 2017) (“‘In the absence of unusual circumstances,’ remand for a new hearing is the appropriate habeas remedy when a petitioner challenges a [Board] decision.” (quoting Gambino v.

Smith v. Baltimore & OR Co.

48 F.2d 861 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 1931

The execution of the said agreement was authorized and approved by the board of directors of the First Bank at a meeting of said board, attended by all of the members of the board, duly convened on the 23d day of February … In Ahl v.

International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, Lodge No. 335 v. Chicago Pneumatic Co.

452 F. Supp. 592 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 5, 1978

We do not find the rule of tort cases to be applicable to a contract dispute, see United Protective Workers v. Ford Motor Co., 223 F.2d 49 (7th Cir. 1955). We do not find that N.L.R.B. v. … Gullett Gin Co., 340 U.S. 361 , 71 S.Ct. 337 , 95 L.Ed. 337 (1951), applies to this case because that decision involved a review of the discretion of the National Labor Relations Board.

In re Farrell Realty Co.

10 F.2d 612 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 1925

Flynn that the bankruptcy had been authorized by the board, and, strangely, the minute book of the company has disappeared; Freebie and Laning each alleging that it is in possession of the other. … In Zeitinger v. Hargadine et al., after long litigation, the local court had announced its findings and had declared its intention to appoint a receiver.

Shea v. Leisy

85 F. 243 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 8, 1898

Brown v. Spofford, 95 U. S. 474 ; Bast v. Bank, 101 U. S. 93 . … Hunter v. McHose, 100 Pa. St. 38; Irvin v. Irvin, 142 Pa. St. 271, 21 Atl. 816 ; Wodock v. Robinson, 148 Pa. St. 503, 506, 24 Atl. 73 . In Hunter v.

Geruschat v. Ernst & Young LLP

346 B.R. 123 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 2006

Universal Minerals, Inc. v. C.A. Hughes & Co., 669 F.2d 98 (3d Cir.1981); Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Metro Communications, Inc., 945 F.2d 635 (3d Cir.1991). … With no demand having been made on the successor entity’s board of directors, it was appropriate to dismiss the claims on that basis alone.

Johnson v. University of Pittsburgh

359 F. Supp. 1002 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 4, 1973

See Perry v. Sinderman, 408 U.S. 593 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 (1972); Walker v. California State College Board of Trustees, 351 F.Supp. 997 (W.D.Pa.1972). We are, of course, aware of the recent case of Green v. … Board of Regents of Texas Tech., 335 F.Supp. 249 (N.D.Tex.1971) aff’d 474 F.2d 594 (5th Cir. 1973) .

WHITEHEAD

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 2025

Brown, United States Magistrate Judge I. … Brown Christopher B.

Justice v. United States

208 F. Supp. 724 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 20, 1962

Under Pennsylvania law, as set forth in Brown v. … Maio v. Fahs, 339 Pa. 180, 190 , 14 A.2d 105 (1940); Davis v. Miller, 385 Pa. 348, 352 , 123 A.2d 422 (1956); Daugherty v.

YOUNG v. GILMORE

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 2019

McConnell v. Thompson, CIV.A. 14-747, 2014 WL 4348173, at *1 (W.D. Pa. … Facilities, Inc. v. Fla.

Sharon Steel Corp. v. SKW Metals & Alloys, Inc. (In Re Sharon Steel Corp.)

156 B.R. 14 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 1993

Brown v. Pennsylvania State Employees Credit Union, 851 F.2d 81, 84 (3d Cir.1988). The instant appeal is related to a similar appeal filed at Civil Action No. 93-297.

Collins v. Pennsylvania Telephone Union, Local No. 1944

418 F. Supp. 50 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 1976

Martire was tried by the Union trial board for “negligence and incompetence” in discharging his duties as business manager. … In Wood v.

Switalski v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local Union No. 3

881 F. Supp. 205 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 1995

SINGLE-ENTITY TEST Although there is no Third Circuit Court of Appeals case directly on point, sev *208 eral other courts of appeals have adopted a four-prong test utilized by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in … Childs v. Local 18, Int’l Brotherhood of Elec. Workers, 719 F.2d 1379 (9th Cir.1983); Mas Marques v. Digital Equip. Corp., 637 F.2d 24 (1st Cir.1980); Baker v. Stuart Broadcasting Co., 560 F.2d 389 (8th Cir.1977).

In Re Phar-Mor, Inc. Securities Litigation

893 F. Supp. 484 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 26, 1995

COMPUTER LEASING, INC., Plaintiff, v. COOPERS & LYBRAND, et al., Defendants. CENTER CAPITAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. COOPERS & LYBRAND, et al., Defendants. NEW ENGLAND CAPITAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. … Veazey v. Doremus, 103 N.J. 244 , 510 A.2d 1187, 1189 (1986).

Petruska v. Gannon University

350 F. Supp. 2d 666 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2004

Board. … Count Six alleges claims against Gannon and its Board for negligent supervision and retention of Trautman as Chair of the Board, Garibaldi as President, and Rouch as Part-time Vice Present of the University.