Case law

Commonwealth v. Corish

296 Pa. Super. 92 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 1982

On December 1, 1979, a parole board warrant was outstanding for appellant’s arrest. On that day he was observed driving a vehicle in the City of Harrisburg, Dauphin County. … Harris v. United States, supra; Commonwealth v. Tome, 484 Pa. 261, 271 , 398 A.2d 1369, 1375 (1979); Commonwealth v. Harris, supra 479 Pa. at 138 , 387 A.2d at 873 ; Commonwealth v.

Com. v. Solomon, P.

247 A.3d 1163 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 2021

agency in addition to or in place of the board. … See Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Swift

291 Pa. Super. 90 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 1981

Although mere presence at the scene is insufficient to convict, Commonwealth v. Bailey, 448 Pa. 224 , 292 A.2d 345 (1973), Commonwealth v. Roscioli, 454 Pa. 59 , 309 A.2d 396 (1973) , Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Potter, 445 Pa. 284 , 285 A.2d 492 (1971), Commonwealth v. Caesar, 478 Pa. 575 , 387 A.2d 471 (1978).

Commonwealth v. Dillard

221 Pa. Super. 310 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 16, 1972

Brown was riding in the back seat. A state police corporal signaled the automobile to stop. Before the automobile stopped he saw two items thrown from the automobile by Merigo. … See Commonwealth v. Giacobbe, 341 Pa. 187 , 19 A.2d 71 (1941); Commonwealth v. Karamarkovic, 218 Pa. 405 , 67 A. 650 (1907).

McMillan, E. v. Children and Youth Servs. Del Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 27, 2022

Brown’s abuse of Je.M. … See also Coulter v.

Hecker v. Shannopin Coal Co.

137 Pa. Super. 581 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 1939

Opinion by Cunningham, J., In its main features, this workmen’s compensation case so closely resembles that of Harring v. … The referee awarded compensation to the widow and children, the board affirmed the action of the referee and the court below entered judgment on the award; this appeal is from that judgment.

Commonwealth v. Rose

2013 Pa. Super. 305 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 25, 2013

Commonwealth v. Brown, 26 A.3d 485, 493 (Pa.Super.2011). Article I, Section 17 of the Pennsylvania Constitution is Pennsylvania’s ex post facto clause. … See Commonwealth v. Brown, 741 A.2d 726 (Pa.Super.1999); Commonwealth v. Scott, 345 Pa.Super. 86 , 497 A.2d 656 (1985); Commonwealth v. Grady, 337 Pa.Super. 174 , 486 A.2d 962 (1984); see also Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Jackson

146 Pa. Super. 328 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 2, 1941

Com. v. Park & Reed, 1 Gray 553, (Mass.); Com. v. Nichols, 10 Met. 259 , (Mass.). The same rule was applied in Com. v. … Rohrer v. Milk Control Board, 322 Pa. 257 , 188 A. 338 .

Commonwealth v. Banker Bros.

38 Pa. Super. 101 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 26, 1909

S. 489 ; Brown v. Houston, 114 U. S. 622 ; Emert v. Missouri, 156 U. S. 296 ; American Steel & Wire Co. v. Speed, 192 U. S. 500 ; Diamond Match Company v. Ontonagon, 188 U. S. 82 ; General Oil Company v. Crain, 209 U. … Should the tax be regarded as a tax upon a trade, or the business of vending merchandise, as it in Pennsylvania has been held to be, Knisely v. *110 Cotterel, 196 Pa. 614 ; Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Leddington

2006 Pa. Super. 250 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 2006

Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v.

Com. v. Kuhn, C.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 27, 2018

As a probationer, Walter Brown had “limited Fourth Amendment rights because of a diminished expectation of privacy.” Commonwealth v. Parker, 152 A.3d 309, 316 (Pa. Super. 2016). … Commonwealth v. Rathfon, 705 A.2d 448 (Pa.

Com. v. Golden, K.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 23, 2026

Commonwealth v. … Brown, 141 A.3d 491 ([Pa.

A. Schulman, Inc. v. Baer Co.

197 Pa. Super. 429 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 1962

Carlos Baer *433 was the president of the company, the other brothers and sisters being members of the Board of Directors and apparently officers of the company. … See Severance v. Heyl & Patterson, Inc., 123 Pa. Superior Ct. 553 , 187 A. 53 (1936); Osborne v. Victor Dairies, Inc., 138 Pa. Superior Ct. 117 , 10 A. 2d 129 (1939); Farneth v.

Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. Milne

90 Pa. Super. 68 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 1926

We have held that by analogy thereto the same rule should apply in orders for support pendente lite, (Lynn v. Lynn, 68 Pa. Superior Ct. 324 ), and in proceedings for maintenance (Com. v. Kramer, 80 Pa. … See Wellesley v. Duke of Beaufort, 2 Russell C. C. 1, pp. 23, 30; The Qneen v. Joyce, 16 Viner’s Abr. 423.

Com. v. Hopkins, G.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 31, 2015

She asserted that at one point that day, she walked through the apartment, and observed that the victim's ironing board was up along with the dress she had worn the night before lying over the ironing board. … (citing Hoffa v.

Weir v. Rahon

279 Pa. Super. 508 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 8, 1980

See, e. g,, Polka v. May, supra; Hertzog v. Hertzog’s Administrator, 34 *513 Pa. 418 (1859); Immel v. Herb, 43 Pa.Super. 111 (1910); Stephens v. Barnes, 30 Pa.Super. 127 (1906); Swayne v. … See Rineer v.

Schenck v. Goodman

98 Pa. Super. 384 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 1929

We held in Nicholson v. Schaffer, supra, that the provision in the Practice Act of 1915, P. … It was a “default which ordinarily would be relieved against”: Spinelli v.

Arthurs v. PITTSBURGH

185 Pa. Super. 85 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1958

Calvert Distillers Corp. v. Board of Finance and Revenue, 376 Pa. 476, 480, 481 , 103 A. 2d 668 (1954). … He cites Commonwealth v. Bayuk Cigars, 359 Pa. 202, 208 , 58 A. 2d 445 (1948) as authority for this proposition.

Shore v. Shore

201 Pa. Super. 473 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 1963

Burt v. Burt, 194 Pa. Superior Ct. 34 , 166 A. 2d 85 (1960) ; Lee v. Lee, 185 Pa. Superior Ct. 252 , 137 A. 2d 827 (1958). … In MacDonnell v. MacDonnell, 190 Pa.

Hahn v. Richter

427 Pa. Super. 130 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 16, 1993

Castagna, supra and Incollingo v. Ewing, supra, in cases involving the warning labels on prescription drugs. Therefore, as was aptly set forth by the California Supreme Court in Brown v. … See, Brown v. Superior Court (Abbot Laboratories), 44 Cal.3d 1049 , 245 Cal.Rptr. 412 , 751 P.2d 470 (1988). DeLuryea v. Winthrop Laboratories, etc. (8th Cir.1983) 697 F.2d 222, 228-29 ; Basko v.