Case law

Burns v. Mitchell

252 Pa. Super. 257 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1977

Quoting Miles v. Penna. Coal Co., 245 Pa. 94 , 91 A. 211 (1914) and Brown v. McKinney, 9 Watts, 565 , 567 our Supreme Court noted in Dimura v. … As we noted in Lyons v.

Commonwealth v. Allison

155 Pa. Super. 290 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1944

he may be there called and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with his sentence or any part of it that had not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas. 1 Now known as The State Board … L. 903, 63 PS 401 et seq. 3 Com. v. Allison, 103 Pa. Superior Ct. 140 , 156 A. 812 ; Com. v. Allison, 132 Pa. Superior Ct. 606 , 1 A. (2d) 920.

Commonwealth v. Cox

276 Pa. Super. 29 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 1980

See, e. g., Commonwealth v. Brown, 264 Pa.Super. 127 , 399 A.2d 699 (1979); Commonwealth v. Griffin, supra; Commonwealth v. Taylor, 254 Pa.Super. 211 , 385 A.2d 984 (1978). … See Commonwealth v. Griffin, supra.

Commonwealth v. Hufnal

4 Pa. Super. 301 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1897

Co. v. Catawissa R. R. Co. 53 Pa. 20 . … Powell, 114 Pa. 265; affirmed in Powell v. Commonwealth, 127 U. S. 678 ; Commonwealth v. Shirley, 152 Pa. 170 .

Com. v. Dixon, N

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 2014

The fire was described by Brown and Sheena Washington, who was inside the residence. … -5- J-S49018-14 Commonwealth v. Brown, 767 A.2d 576, 582 (Pa. Super. 2001). See also, Commonwealth v. Pander, 100 A.3d 626, 639-642 (Pa.

Clancy v. Recker

246 Pa. Super. 205 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 18, 1977

Factor v. Getz, 442 Pa. 384 , 276 A.2d 511 (1971). However, such evidence is admissible to prove the intent of the parties when the written instrument is vague and ambiguous. Factor v. … Finley v. Glenn, 303 Pa. 131 , 154 A. 299 (1931).

Gallo, M. v. Conemaugh Health, Appeal of: Padhiar

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 2015

.”); Gormley v. Edgar, 995 A.2d 1197 (Pa. … In O’Boyle v.

Com. v. Arnold, S.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 4, 2025

See also Commonwealth v. Wheeler, 314 A.3d 1286, 1289 (Pa. … Commonwealth v. Lark, 746 A.2d 585, 588 (Pa. 2000), overruled on other grounds by Commonwealth v. Small, 238 A.3d 1267 (Pa. 2020) (emphasis added).

Commonwealth v. Janek

242 Pa. Super. 340 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 1976

Hester has not been overruled, and in fact has been cited by the Supreme Court in recent cases, including Air Pollution Variance Board v. Western Alfalfa, 416 U.S. 861, 865 , 94 S.Ct. 2114 , 40 L.Ed.2d 607 (1974). … Preston v. United States, 376 U.S. 364 , 84 S.Ct. 881 , 11 L.Ed.2d 777 (1964); Commonwealth v. Tookes, supra.

Commonwealth v. Robinson

2009 Pa. Super. 65 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 9, 2009

Brown, 577 Pa. 315 , 845 A.2d 199 (2004) (remanding per cmiam to the trial court to make on-the-record determination that PCRA petitioner’s waiver of counsel for first PCRA petition was “knowing, intelligent and voluntary … See Commonwealth v.

Com. v. Jackson, L.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 2016

(quoting McElrath v. Commonwealth, 592 A.2d 740, 743 (Pa.Super. 1991). In Brown, the eyewitness, Golla, was six to twelve inches away from Brown when she saw his face. … Although this Court noted in Commonwealth v.

New Amsterdam Building & Loan Ass'n v. Moyerman

95 Pa. Super. 47 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 1928

Stave Co.’s Appeal, 225 Pa. 178, 180 ; King v. Brooks, 72 Pa. 363, 364 . … Chief Justice Brown in the latter case is appropriate: “Conceding that the proper construction of the bond makes it a mere indemnity, and not an absolute undertaking for the payment of money, execution could have issued on

Erie Insurance v. Bullard

2003 Pa. Super. 448 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 24, 2003

Brown v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 314 Pa.Super. 78 , 460 A.2d 773 (1983). ¶ 13 A record that reflects a failure to comply with Rule 237.1 is facially defective and cannot support a default judgment. Fierst v. … See Jones v.

Eberle v. Union Dental Co.

182 Pa. Super. 519 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1956

In this workmen’s compensation case the board affirmed the referee in awarding benefits and the court entered judgment on the award. … Meucci v. Gallatin Coal Co., 279 Pa. 184 , 123 A. 766 . Cf. Feeney v. N. Snellenburg & Co., 103 Pa. Superior Ct. 284 , 157 A. 379 .

Langer v. Superior Steel Corp.

105 Pa. Super. 579 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 3, 1932

It was held in Presbyterian Board of Foreign Missions v. … Alloys Co. v. Cyclops S. Co., supra.

Commonwealth v. One Box Containing Benedictine

89 Pa. Super. 467 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 14, 1926

The grounds for probable belief was very similar to those which were sustained in Com. v. Schwartz, 82 Pa. … Superior Ct. 569 ; Com. v. Vanderpool, 84 Pa. Superior Ct. 552 . See also Com. v. Hunsinger not yet reported. , The assignments of error are sustained, the judgment is reversed.

Toll-Barkan Co. v. TOLL

193 Pa. Super. 221 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 1960

In Fourth Avenue Baptist Church v. … Since the Act of 1901, Brown v. Engle, 75 Pa. Superior Ct. 592 , is authority for naming only the present owner.

Com. v. Thompson, J.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 2025

Commonwealth v. Brown, G. L., 111 A.3d 171, 176 (Pa. Super. 2015) (some citations omitted). … In Commonwealth v. Brown, J., 141 A.3d 491, 502 (Pa.

Testa v. National Radiator Corp.

141 Pa. Super. 206 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1940

The award was sustained by the Workmen’s Compensation Board and by the court below, and judgment was entered for claimant. The employer and its insurance carrier have appealed. … Bontempt v. Suburban Construction Co., 107 Pa. Superior Ct. 258, 260 , 163 A. 46 .

Loftus v. Carbondale

195 Pa. Super. 52 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1961

Rush v. Philadelphia, 62 Pa. Superior Ct. 80 (1916); Kohn v. Philadelphia, 156 Pa. Superior Ct. 112 , 39 A. 2d 531 (1944). … A broad discretion is vested in the administrative officials as to what constitutes just cause for suspension or dismissal under the civil service act; a court cannot substitute its judgment for that of the trial board, in