Case law

Szarmack v. Welch

220 Pa. Super. 407 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1972

Terry v. … . & C. 2d 217 (Delaware County 1970) ; Muschar v. University and City Ministries, 118 P.L.J. 409 (Allegheny County 1970) ; Brown v. Metz, 48 Pa.

Eberle v. Union Dental Co.

182 Pa. Super. 519 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1956

In this workmen’s compensation case the board affirmed the referee in awarding benefits and the court entered judgment on the award. … Meucci v. Gallatin Coal Co., 279 Pa. 184 , 123 A. 766 . Cf. Feeney v. N. Snellenburg & Co., 103 Pa. Superior Ct. 284 , 157 A. 379 .

Holland v. Kohn

155 Pa. Super. 95 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 11, 1944

It was only an estimate made of the speed of a car coming towards him, which is always difficult to gauge correctly (Mulheirn v. Brown, 322 Pa. 171, 173 , 185 A. 304 ; Anderson v. Perta, 138 Pa. … See Freedman v. Ziccardi, 151 Pa.

Philadelphia v. Hinkle

64 Pa. Super. 495 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1916

In 1907 an ordinance was adopted by the councils of the city directing the board of surveyors to place upon the city plan......“Yenango street, of the width of fifty feet, as now physically open.” … Railway Co. v. Dunn, 56 Pa. 280 ; Commonwealth v. Moorehead, 118 Pa. 344 ; Commonwealth v. Shoemaker, 14 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Merschen

340 Pa. Super. 387 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 15, 1985

Brown, 491 Pa. 507 , 421 A.2d 660 (1980): To avail oneself of deadly force for self-protection, three factors must be found to exist. … Herein, if the appellant’s story is given credence, it meets the requirements set forth in Brown .

Commonwealth v. McDonald

73 Pa. Super. 341 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 1920

The testimony was fairly reviewed by the trial judge, and the jury was instructed that “if the proceeding was open and above board and the sale was made honestly and in good faith, the defendant should be acquitted.” … The defense interposed was substantially the same as that in Com. v. Berney, 262 Pa. 174 , to witThat it was not a leasing, but a sale of the property.

City of Wilkes-Barre v. Garabed

11 Pa. Super. 355 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 28, 1899

Two notable instances of it are found in Commissioners v. Gas Co., 12 Pa. 318 , and in Kneedler v. Norristown, 100 Pa. 368 . … A. 110; Richmond v. Dudley, 129 Ind. 112 ; 13 L. R. A. 587; State v. Dering, 84 Wis. 585 ; 19 L. R. A. 859, where will be found a voluminous collection of the cases on this subject; Chicago v.

Commonwealth v. Vidal

198 A.3d 1097 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 2018

Commonwealth v. Gibbs, 181 A.3d 1165, 1166 (Pa. Super. 2018); accord Commonwealth v. Kyle, 874 A.2d 12, 17 (Pa. 2005). … See Commonwealth v. Brown, 982 A.2d 1017, 1019 (Pa.

Betts v. American Stores Co.

105 Pa. Super. 452 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1932

State Insurance Fund, 279 Pa. 524 ; Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co., 284 Pa. 348 ; Potter v. Claar, 289 Pa. 418 ; Diriscavage v. Penna. Coal Co., 96 Pa. Superior Ct. 189 . … In Clark v.

LaBriola v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

227 Pa. Super. 305 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 1974

Farrell v. Placer County, 23 Cal. 2d 624 , 145 P. 2d 570 (1944); Rand v. Andreatta, 60 Cal. 2d 846 , 36 Cal. Rptr. 846 , 389 P. 2d 382 (1964); Cruise v. City & County of San Francisco, 101 Cal. … App. 2d 558 , 225 P. 2d 988 (1951); Tillman v. City of Pomona Beach, 100 So. 2d 53 (Fla. 1957); Rabinowitz v. Bay Harbor Island, 178 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1965); Bauer v.

Com. v. Mason, S.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 2, 2026

I found Trooper Brown’s testimony that the sign was clearly visible to be credible. … See, e.g., Commonwealth v.

Braddock Electric Railway Co. v. Bily

11 Pa. Super. 144 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 28, 1899

They are undertakings not only with the company and the commonwealth, but with all the other subscribers to the stock; Graff v. Pittsburg & Steubenville R. R. Co., 31 Pa. 489 . … Co. v. Bowser, 48 Pa. 37 .

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Crane v. Rosenberger

212 Pa. Super. 144 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 1968

Christos v. Christos, 156 Pa. Superior Ct. 238 , 40 A. 2d 165 (1944). … Meholiff v. River Transit Company, 342 Pa. 394 , 20 A. 2d 762 (1941).

Com. v. Rosendary, E.

2024 Pa. Super. 51 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 2024

See United States v. … See Commonwealth v. Brown, 361 A.2d 846, 850 (Pa. Super. 1976). We find United States v.

Clancy v. Recker

246 Pa. Super. 205 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 18, 1977

Factor v. Getz, 442 Pa. 384 , 276 A.2d 511 (1971). However, such evidence is admissible to prove the intent of the parties when the written instrument is vague and ambiguous. Factor v. … Finley v. Glenn, 303 Pa. 131 , 154 A. 299 (1931).

Com. v. Cornish, J.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 24, 2014

In Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v.

Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

185 Pa. Super. 460 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1958

Water Co. v. Pa. P. U. C., 164 Pa. Superior Ct. 320 , 64 A. 2d 500 .” … Philadelphia Suburban Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 164 Pa. Superior Ct. 320 , 64 A. 2d 500 ; Brown v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 152 Pa.

Lauffer v. Vial

153 Pa. Super. 342 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1943

Ferri et al. v. Liberatoscioli et al., 338 Pa. 454, 456 , 13 A. 2d 45 ; McDowell v. Simpson, 3 Watts 129,136 .) … It is, of course, “repugnant to every sense of justice and fair dealing that a principal shall avail himself of the benefits of an agent’s act, and at the same time repudiate his authority’’: Presbyterian Board v.

American Rehabilitation & Physical Therapy, Inc. v. American Motorists Insurance

2003 Pa. Super. 273 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 23, 2003

As such, they are excluded from coverage under the “professional services” exclusion. ¶ 17 We find this Court’s decision in Board of Public Education of the School District of Pittsburgh v. National Union Fire Ins. … Board of Public Education of the School District of Pittsburgh, 709 A.2d at 913 .

Com. v. Prince, A.

320 A.3d 698 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 24, 2024

See Commonwealth v. … Elliot, 50 A.3d 1284 (Pa. 2012), our Supreme Court held that the Parole Board and its agents “cannot impose any condition of supervision it wishes, carte blanche.