Case law

In the Int. of: M.F.-O., Appeal of: S.F.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 2024

Commonwealth v. Flowers, 113 A.3d 1246, 1250 (Pa. Super. 2015); see also Commonwealth v. Dempster, 187 A.3d 266, 272 (Pa. … Brown’s testimony.

Lowe v. L. & H. Transportation Co.

149 Pa. Super. 481 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1942

The board fixed deceased’s wages at $7.50 per day (12 hours at 62% cents per hour), and his weekly wage at 5% times that amount, or $41.25, and in. doing so relied on Romig v. … An argument can be made in support of tbe methods of computation adopted by tbe referee, the board, and appellants.

Commonwealth v. Warner

309 Pa. Super. 386 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 2, 1983

Commonwealth v. Vukovich, 301 Pa.Super. 111, 117 , 447 A.2d 267, 269 (1982), citing Commonwealth v. Brown, 346 Pa. 192, 199 , 29 A.2d 793, 796-97 (1943). … And, in Commonwealth v.

Com. v. Poole, J.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 2020

Smith v. … v.

Commonwealth v. Flowers

245 Pa. Super. 198 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 1976

See generally Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); Commonwealth v. Davenport, 453 Pa. 235 , 308 A.2d 85 (1975); Commonwealth v. … Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975).

Commonwealth v. Blackburn

272 Pa. Super. 1 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1979

Commonwealth v. Brown, 467 Pa. 388, 392 , 357 A.2d 147, 149 (1976). … In Commonwealth v. Bell, 442 Pa. 566, 571 , 276 A.2d 834, 836 (1971), quoted in Commonwealth v.

Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Boiler Erection & Repair Co.

2008 Pa. Super. 280 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 2008

Rittner Co. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Rittner), 76 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 596, 464 A.2d 675 (1983). Generally, injuries received by an employee travelling to or from work are not compensable. Wolfe v. … Jones v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Rehabilitation Coordinators, Inc.), 88 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 426, *390 489 A.2d 1006 (1985).

Fletcher v. Raymond Corp.

424 Pa. Super. 605 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1993

Sherk v. Daisy-Heddon, Div. of Victor Comptometer Corp., 498 Pa. 594 , 450 A.2d 615, 618 (1982). Id. at 513. See also: Brown v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 741 F.2d 656, 661 (3d Cir.1984). … See: Sherk v. Daisy-Heddon, supra; Staymates v. ITT Holub Industries, 364 Pa.Super. 37 , 527 A.2d 140 (1987); Conti v. Ford Motor Co., supra. AFFIRMED.

Funeral Benefit Ass'n v. Col. Ellsworth Council No. 960

66 Pa. Super. 10 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1917

the defendant did not withdraw, from the plaintiff association, nor give notice of any intention to withdraw, but separated itself from the association by failing and re *21 fusing to pay the assessments ordered by the board … As we held, in construing this same by-law in Funeral Benefit Association v. Hyatt Council, 62 Pa.

Flinn v. Sonman Shaft Coal Co.

153 Pa. Super. 76 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 1943

Opinion by Kenworthey, J., The Workmen’s Compensation Board found that at the time of his death William Flinn stood in loco parentis to his seven minor brothers and sisters and that they were members of his household. … J. 358, note 77 [a]; or ‘A person assuming the parental character, or discharging parental duties’; Wetherby v. Dixon, 19 Ves. Jr. 407, 412; Vonder Horst v. Vonder Horst, 88 Md. 127 , 41 A. 124 .” Renovich v.

Panther Valley Water Co. v. Public Service Commission

70 Pa. Super. 8 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 10, 1918

A. v. Beaver V. W. Co., 68 Pa. Superior Ct. 122 , in which case this court said: “The complaint was as to the unreasonableness of a rule or regulation. … They have uniformly held that service pipes from the main to the curb line should be installed by the company: City of Janesville v. Janesville Water Company, 7 Wis. R. C. R. 628; Consumers’ Co. v. Hatch, 224 U.

Commonwealth v. Miller

189 Pa. Super. 345 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1959

See also Com. v. Barfod, 160 Pa. Superior Ct. 59 , 50 A. 2d 36 ; Com. v. Richardson, 174 Pa. Superior Ct. 171 , 100 A. 2d 155 . Com. v. Somers, 14 Pa. C. C. 159; Com. v. Harris, 22 Lack. Jur. 221; Com. v. … Reg. 297; Com. v. Avery Hill, 7 Chester 72; Dillingham v. U. S., 2 Wash. C. C. 422 .

Burgis v. Philadelphia County

169 Pa. Super. 23 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 19, 1951

While it is scarcely necessary to cite authorities for this, see Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Martha Company et al., 359 Pa. 347, 352 , 59 A. 2d 166 , citing U. S. v. Fisk, 70 U. S. 445, 447 . … Augustine v. County of Philadelphia, 7 Pa. Law Journal Reports *27 124.

Kress House Moving Co. v. Brennan

77 Pa. Super. 57 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 1921

The rule applicable was stated in an opinion by Judge Trexler in Keown v. Bunton, 61 Pa. Superior Ct. 220 at 223 , to be: a party who has had a jury trial under the Act of May 5, 1911, P. … Wolfe, 111 Pa. 471, 480 ; Bailey v. Marshall, 174 Pa. 602 ; Crawford v. Pyle & Brown, 190 Pa. 263 . The order is affirmed.

Bottinger v. Independence Indemnity Co.

108 Pa. Super. 39 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1932

See Johnson v. Jeddo Highland Coal Co., 99 *43 Pa. Superior Ct. 94, 97; Heifer v. P. & R. C. &; I. Co., 102 Pa. Superior Ct. 235 , 156 A. 722 ; Krock v. Ballard Sprague & Co., 104 Pa. Superior Ct. 389 , 159 A. 191 . … Board is affirmed.

Beck v. Philadelphia Automobile Trade Ass'n

59 Pa. Super. 145 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 24, 1915

As a general rule it is improper to permit a defendant to interject a defense on cross-examination: Bohan v. Avoca Borough, 154 Pa. 404 . … It also appears that this commission of twenty-five per centum, received by the plaintiff, alleged to be wrongfully taken, was known to the treasurer of the show committee and to the board of directors.

In re E.P.

2003 Pa. Super. 473 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 2003

Conner v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 820 A.2d 1266 (Pa.Super.2003). We have a broad scope of review in cases such as this. See In re R.W.J., 826 A.2d 10, 12 (Pa.Super.2003). … Morrison v. Com., DPW, 538 Pa. 122 , 646 A.2d 565, 570 (1994). If a trial court gives specific reasons for its disposition, we may only examine its stated reasons.

Kiser v. H. S. Kerbaugh, Inc.

40 Pa. Super. 163 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 14, 1909

In the recent case of Sowers v. … In Kerbaugh v. Caldwell, 151 Fed.

Banks v. Brazze

165 Pa. Super. 268 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1949

Smith v. Rossiter & Sons Co. et al., 158 Pa. Superior Ct. 128 , 44 A. 2d 298 . … Buck v. Arndt et al., 153 Pa. Superior Ct. 632, 637 , 34 A. 2d 823 . *272 The present case is clearly ruled in every aspect by the principles reviewed by us in Rovere v. Interstate Cemetery Co., 164 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Bennett

110 Pa. Super. 303 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1933

Com. v. Coles, 265 Pa. 362 , 108 A. 826 ; Com. v. Weiss, 284 Pa. 105 , 130 A. 403 ; Com. v. Brandler, 81 Pa. Superior Ct. 585 . *306 It was held in Com. v. … Com. v. Brown, 150 Mass. 330 , 23 N. E. 49 , 1 R. C. L. 551.