Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspasuperct

10,000+ results

1.96s

  • Flouders v. FOSTER

    212 Pa. Super. 418 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 13, 1968

    Rice v. Foster, 2, W. & S. 58 (1841); Anderson v. Levan, 1 W. & S. 334 (1841); Hartman v. Stahl, 2 P. & W. 223 (1830). … Klugman v. Gimbel Brothers, Inc., 198 Pa.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Pittman

    200 Pa. Super. 1 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1962

    The men offered no comment but rose and Officer Stewart removed the trash basket, revealing a brown paper bag, the contents of which proved to be heroin. … Spencer v. Ashe, 364 Pa. 442, 445 , 71 A. 2d 799 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Nash v. Chemetron Corporation

    246 Pa. Super. 595 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1977

    The moving party has the burden of proving that a summary judgment is appropriate, Ammerman v. … Barker v. Brown, 236 Pa.Super. 75 , 340 A.2d 566 (1975). We have determined that there is no genuine issue of material fact in this case and that the lower court properly granted appellee’s motion. Therefore, we affirm.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Bready

    220 Pa. Super. 157 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 13, 1971

    Our Court, in Commonwealth v. Brown, 116 Pa. … Morissette v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Diriscavage v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.

    96 Pa. Super. 189 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 4, 1929

    In Calderwood v. … This case comes Within the principle laid down in Gausman v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Com. v. Curry, M.

    Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 13, 2018

    Commonwealth v. Parker, 847 A.2d 745, 750 (Pa. Super. 2004). … Brown’s daughter, and an infant child of Appellant and Ms. Brown. N.T., 3/6/18, at 40. He added that “as a part of his parole supervision, that’s where [Appellant] was required to be living.” Id.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Commonwealth v. Torr

    111 Pa. Super. 178 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 1933

    Reifsteck, 271 Pa. 441, 444 , 115 A. 130 ; Brown v. Com., 78 Pa. 122 ; Donaldson v. Com., 95 Pa. 21 ; McMeen v. Com., 114 Pa. 300 , 9 A. 878 ; Dougherty v. Com., 69 Pa. 286, 289 . In the case of Com. v. … Justice Schaffer in the case of Com. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Carnes

    82 Pa. Super. 335 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1923

    Justice Brown in the same case, Com. v. … See Com. v. Fisher, 213 Pa. 48 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Lovette

    271 Pa. Super. 250 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 1979

    Appellant was holding a brown paper bag in his hand. The officer approached and requested identification, but the men did not identify themselves. … Commonwealth v. LeSeuer, 252 Pa.Super. 498 , 382 A.2d 127 (1977); Commonwealth v. Harper, 248 Pa.Super. 344 , 375 A.2d 129 (1977), as guided by the Supreme Court decisions in Terry v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Commonwealth v. Lovette, 498 Pa. 665 (1982)Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Floczak v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

    289 Pa. Super. 438 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 24, 1981

    Hartmann v. Peterson, 438 Pa. 291 , 265 A.2d 127 (1970); Commonwealth v. Livingood, 22 Pa.Cmwlth. 530 , 349 A.2d 816 (1976). … The judge who decided the present case has also decided Long v. Rockwood, 5 Pa.D. & C.3d 457 (1978), Simonds v. Safeguard Mutual Insurance Company, 5 Pa.D. & C.3d 467 (1978), and Brown v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Com. v. Pratt, K.

    2026 Pa. Super. 73 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 2026

    Commonwealth v. Brown, 414 A.2d 70 (Pa. 1980). Relevant evidence is admissible if its probative value outweighs its prejudicial impact. Commonwealth v. Shain, 471 A.2d 1246, 1249 (Pa. 1984). … Commonwealth v. Brown, 249 A.3d 1206, 1211 (Pa. Super. 2021). “The determination of whether a particular issue raises a substantial question is to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.” Commonwealth v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bruce v. Sch. Dis. of Sykesville Bor.

    96 Pa. Super. 346 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 8, 1929

    The law does not authorize them, while defending them *350 selves, to require the plaintiff school district to pay their counsel and there is no power in the court to require it; Hempstead v. … Such auditors shall also examine, and report to the proper boards of school directors upon the sufficiency and the *351 security of the bonds of the officers, employes, and appointees of the boards of school directors and

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Com. v. Taylor, M.

    Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 23, 2021

    See Commonwealth v. Larkin, 235 A.3d 350, 354 (Pa. … Second, this Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Brown, 134 A.3d 1097 (Pa. Super. 2016), supports the PCRA court’s determination that a hearing was not warranted in this case.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Venchik v. Pennsylvania Railroad

    143 Pa. Super. 438 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 1940

    Blaskey, Appellant v. Penna. R. R. Co., supra; Wink v. Western Md. Ry. Co., 116 Pa. Superior Ct. 374 , 176 A. 760 ; Everetts v. Penna. R. R. Co., 330 Pa. 321 , 198 A. 796 . … R., 225 Pa. 528; Keiser v. R. R., 212 Pa. 409; Knox v. R. R., 202 Pa. 504 ; Zotter v. Lehigh Valley R. R.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Caplan v. Caplan

    174 Pa. Super. 583 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 1954

    Uhlinger v. Uhlinger, 169 Pa. Superior Ct. 574 , 83 A. 2d 423 ; Horton v. Horton, 170 Pa. Superior Ct. 209 , 85 A. 2d 602 . From our independent review of the record, we find no cause to alter the decision. … She now argues that the case was dropped because the plaintiff voluntarily agreed to send her support money and that support is the primary purpose of a divorce from bed and board.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Fuhrman v. Doll

    305 Pa. Super. 277 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1982

    See Stemniski v. Stemniski, 403 Pa. 38 , 169 A.2d 51 (1961); Lindenfelser v. Lindenfelser, 396 Pa. 530 , 153 A.2d 901 (1959); DeLuca v. DeLuca, 388 Pa. 167 , 130 A.2d 179 (1957). … Shoup v. Shoup, 469 Pa. 165, 170 , 364 A.2d 1319, 1323 (1976). As early as Brown v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. O'Brien

    273 Pa. Super. 198 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 1979

    Commonwealth v. Brown, 242 Pa.Super. 240 , 363 A.2d 1249 (1976). Defendant raises one other issue. … See Commonwealth v. Perkins, 473 Pa. 116 , 373 A.2d 1076 (1977); Commonwealth v. Butcher, 451 Pa. 359 , 304 A.2d 150 (1973); Commonwealth v. Tomlinson, 446 Pa. 241 , 284 A.2d 687 (1971).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Starling v. Lake Meade Property Owners Ass'n

    2015 Pa. Super. 170 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 11, 2015

    Accord Potis v. … See Ecenbarger v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Starling v. Lake Meade Property Owners Ass'n, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 1209 (2017)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • McCollum v. Pittsburg Railways Co.

    51 Pa. Super. 637 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 14, 1912

    of building stone lying along the street curb; she did not see the stone on account of the darkness and because of the fact that she had just left the lighted car; *640 the pile of stone was nearly as high as the running board … Monroe, 202 Pa. 626 ; Meitzner v. B. & O. R. R. Co., 224 Pa. 352 ; Danko v. Pitts. Rys. Co., 230 Pa. 295 ; Smith v. Jackson Twp., 26 Pa. Superior Ct. 234 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Hochberg v. Hochberg

    166 Pa. Super. 306 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 12, 1950

    See Strobel v. Strobel, 100 Pa. Superior Ct. 536, 538 ; Ussler v. Ussler, 158 Pa. Superior Ct. 215, 216 , 44 A. 2d 526 . … Brown, for the purpose of effecting a reconciliation, yet, at that time, she evinced no resentment to or concern about any previous misconduct of libellant, which, it seems to us, would have been the natural reaction of an

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.