Case law

Koch v. William Mann Co.

126 Pa. Super. 366 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1936

Appellant relies upon the case of Mudano v. P. R. T. Co., 289 Pa. 51 , 137 A. 104 , a negligence case, as controlling. … The question has not been squarely raised in a compensation case, but our court indicated its view in Jones v. United Iron & Metal Co., 99 Pa.

Mickshaw v. Coca Cola Bottling Co., Inc.

166 Pa. Super. 148 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 1949

In Davies v. Rhondda District Urban Council, 87 Law Journal Reports, K. B. … However that may be, Feinberg and Myer Ackerman constituted a majority of the board and we think that their conduct was a sufficient ratification of the proposal.

Climax Road Machine Co. v. Allegheny Township

10 Pa. Super. 437 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 28, 1899

Co. v. Montgomery Co. Pass. … Machine Co. v.

Commonwealth v. Thomas

65 Pa. Super. 275 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 1916

In Thackara v. Mintzer, 100 Pa. 151 , and Board of Charities v. Lockard, 198 Pa. 572 , the Supreme Court expressly declined to give to the same argument here advanced, the effect we are now asked to deduce from it. … In Board of Charities v. Lockard, supra, Mr. Justice Potter, thus disposed of the line of .argument we are now considering.

Com. v. Sallam, S.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 2023

Commonwealth v. Brown, 111 A.3d 171, 176 (Pa. Super. 2015) (citation omitted); 42 Pa C.S.A. § 9545(b)(1)(ii). … See Commonwealth v.

Mitchell v. East Nantmeal Township

181 Pa. Super. 482 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1956

Both the board and the lower court affirmed; and judgment was entered against East Nantmeal Township on the award. … But where the evidence, as here, raises an issue of fact, or contradictory inferences can be drawn from it, the question is one for determination by the fact finders — in these cases the referee and the board. Mature v.

Com. v. McCormick, W.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 21, 2014

The court re- ceration with a consecutive year of probation, to be supervised by the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole. … Brown, 741 A.2d 726, 735 (Pa.

Commonwealth v. Lomax

196 Pa. Super. 5 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 1961

J.’ a brown paper bag containing loose weed and some other objects. ‘C. J.’ turned and gave what he received to Hanton, i.e., a brown paper bag containing loose weed and two small capsules containing white powder. … Com. v. Larue, 158 Pa. Superior Ct. 219, 221 , 44 A. 2d 535 ; Com. v. McQueen, 178 Pa. Superior Ct. 38, 40 , 112 A. 2d 820 .

James, F. v, Albert Einstein Medical Center

170 A.3d 1156 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 2017

Peikin’s concession that he is not board certified in oncology. (See Appellant’s Brief, at 29). Nevertheless, there is no dispute that Dr. … See Machado v. Kunkel, 804 A.2d 1238, 1244 (Pa. Super. 2002), appeal denied, 819 A.2d 547 (Pa. 2003); see also Jackson v. Tastykake Inc., 648 A.2d 1214, 1217 (Pa. Super. 1994) (collecting cases).

Lee v. Lee

185 Pa. Super. 252 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1958

The plaintiff boarded at a home in Norris- *254 town, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. The defendant lived with her mother in Norristown. … He went to his boarding house. From that time until the present they have never lived together. It is the plaintiff’s contention that the period of desertion commenced on February 15, 1938.

Com. v. Weber, C.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 2, 2025

See Commonwealth v. Williams, 568 A.2d 1281 (Pa. Super. 1990). … Id. at 1285 (citation omitted); see also Commonwealth v.

Laska v. Zelazowski

134 Pa. Super. 311 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 1938

In Wahl v. Poore, 46 Pa. … Superior Ct. 402 ; Wasser v. Brown, 1 Luz. L. R. Rep. 341. When the defendant had actual knowledge of the pendency of the action, as this defendant had, having been personally served, he was put on inquiry......

Wynn Appeal

188 Pa. Super. 499 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1959

Milford Borough v. Burnett, supra, at page 438. See also: Hazleton v. Lehigh Val. C. Co., 339 Pa. 565 , 16 A. 2d 23 (1940). … In Agardy v.

Webber v. Midway Borough

205 Pa. Super. 464 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 1965

And see Walker v. Nu-Car Carriers, 164 Pa. Superior Ct. 246 , 63 A. 2d 484 . … Whitehouse v. Harris, 248 Pa. 570 , 94 A. 251 , and Commonwealth ex rel. Gardner v.

Pollock v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

139 Pa. Super. 256 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 1939

street railway without a compelling reason beyond his control, and is almost immediately struck by a street car approaching from the rear, he is chargeable with contributory negligence as a matter of law and cannot recover: Brown … v.

Lowry v. Lowry

375 Pa. Super. 382 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 1988

Brown v. … See Brown, 352 Pa.Super. at 273 , 507 A.2d at 1225 (citing In re Holmes Estate, 414 Pa. 403 , 200 A.2d 745 (1964); Bold v. Bold, 358 Pa.Super. 7 , 516 A.2d 741 (1986); Madden v.

Stewart v. GGNSC-Canonsburg, L.P.

2010 Pa. Super. 199 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 2010

Reddam v. KPMG L.L.P., 457 F.3d 1054, 1061 (9th Cir.2006); Brown v. ITT Consumer Financial Corp., 211 F.3d 1217 , 1222 (11th Cir.2000). … v. *220 ITT Consumer Fin.

Wittmer Estate

151 Pa. Super. 274 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 8, 1942

Gantz v. Tyrrell, 7 Pa. Superior Ct. 249 . But if there were any doubt as to testator’s intention it would be dispelled by reference to the will. This was a codicil and not a new will. … Superior Ct. 550 , 184 A. 303 ; Brown’s Estate, 343 Pa. 19 , 21 A. 2d 898 . This conclusion, however, does not affect the result as to appellant’s claim to a share in the estate.

Commonwealth v. Bortlik

154 Pa. Super. 535 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 1944

This appeal is ruled by our decision in Com. v. Conte, 154 Pa. Super. 112 , 35 A.2d 742 , which was based on West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 .

Brunke v. Ridley Township

154 Pa. Super. 182 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1943

amends The General Borough Act, the second amends The First Ol'ass Township Law), five boroughs and three first-class townships of Delaware County, of which the Township of Ridley, appellee, was one, formed a joint sewer board … Co., 268 Pa. 345 [ 112 A. 160 ]; State Highway Route No. 72, 265 Pa. 369 [ 108 A. 820 ]; Spang & Company v. Com., 281 Pa. 414 [ 126 A. 781 ]; Hoffer v.