Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.46s
221 A.3d 186 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 2019
Commonwealth v. Brown, 567 Pa. 272, 786 A.2d 961, 972 (2001). … Brown, 786 A.2d at 972 (citation omitted).
Cited 3 timesPublishedGreene v. United Services Automobile Ass'n
2007 Pa. Super. 344 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 2007
Although the bad faith statute does not include a definition of “bad faith,” the *1188 term encompasses a wide variety of objectionable conduct, as described by a panel of this Court in [Brown v. … Brown, 860 A.2d at 500-501 (some internal citations omitted).
Cited 37 timesPublishedMosley v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
155 Pa. Super. 598 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1944
Where a claimant’s case presents conflicting views on the causes of his disability, the referee and the board are free to adopt the explanation which seems to them to be the more credible one. Savolaine v. … Since the testimony of these witnesses was within defendant’s control, the referee and the board were justified in assuming that, had it been produced, it would have been unfavorable to defendant. Marshall v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedAlbright College Tax Assessment Case
213 Pa. Super. 478 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1968
In the first place, a claimant for a tax exemption has the burden of bringing himself within the exemption statute: Wynnefield United Presbyterian Church v. City of Philadelphia, 348 Pa. 252 , 35 A. 2d 276 ; Com. v. … L. 1019, §58, 46 PS §558(5); Y.M.C.A. v. Reading, 402 Pa. 592 , 167 A. 2d 469 ; McGuire v. Pittsburgh School District, 359 Pa. 602 , 60 A. 2d 44 ; Meadville City v. Odd Fellows’ Home, 128 Pa.
Cited 9 timesPublished200 Pa. Super. 568 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1963
she turned to walk between two cars parked in the first row of cars; that these two cars were approximately two feet apart; that as she got about half-way into the path between the two parked cars she tripped over a dark brown … When this is done, the burden of proving contributory negligence is on the defendant: McCracken v. Curwensville Borough, 309 Pa. 98 , 163 A. 217 . And see Brown v. Jones, 404 Pa. 513 , 172 A. 2d 831 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedMcCleary v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.
184 Pa. Super. 185 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1957
On May 16, 1955 the referee made his findings, conclusions and award which were affirmed by the Board. … The case of Dennis v.
Cited 8 timesPublished74 Pa. Super. 573 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 1920
In Strader v. … Phila., 221 Pa. 266 ; Brown v. White, 206 Pa. 106 ; Hibberd v. Phila., 245 Pa. 265 ; Steck v. Allegheny, 213 Pa. 573 ; Green v. Hollidaysburg, 236 Pa. 430 .
Cited 13 timesPublished107 Pa. Super. 161 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 1932
See 19 Corpus Juris 410; Gruier v. O’Daniel, note to 1 Binney 336, p. 349; Reed v. Reed, 30 Pa. Superior Ct. 229, 235 . … See Hunnings v. Hunnings, 55 Pa. Superior Ct. 261 . Jurisdiction of the subject matter cannot be conferred by estoppel: Wettengel v. Robinson, supra.
Cited 6 timesPublished277 A.3d 1199 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 14, 2022
E.g., Commonwealth v. Pappas, 845 A.2d 829, 838 (Pa. Super. 2004) (a dealer “represented” the quality of cars to buyers when he told them the cars were good and clean); Pirozzi v. … Empowering the Board to control who can present a fact about a vehicle to a consumer thus helps promote the public safety and welfare.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBurlingame v. Paul & Suzanna M. Dagostin, Douglas Zehner, & Country View Family Farms, LLC
183 A.3d 462 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 2018
BOYER, LAMONT & : RUTHANN BROWN, DAVID & GINA BROWN, : THOMAS & MARIE CICINI, PETER & JOANN : COLONE, WILLIAM CONNER, JR. & JUDY : CONNER, ROGER & MICHELE CRAKE, FRANK : & LINDA CRAYTON … Blumenstock v. Gibson, 811 A.2d 1029, 1033 (Pa.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDe Salle v. Penn Central Transportation Co.
263 Pa. Super. 485 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 22, 1979
At sometime prior to 5:45 p. m., both appellee and Wilbert Elwood, the conductor and supervisor of the train crew, boarded a caboose located on the camp track. … They further stated to Lamberson that no one had entered the caboose since they themselves boarded in the late afternoon.
Cited 26 timesPublishedBalanti v. Stineman Coal & Coke Co.
131 Pa. Super. 344 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1938
Superior Ct. 275 ; Com. v. Phillips, 83 Pa. Superior Ct. 213, 216 ; Com. v. Bockes, 103 Pa. Superior Ct. 378, 381 , 157 A. 214 ; Morris v. McKeesport C. & C. Co., 99 Pa. Superior Ct. 112, 115 . … See Morgan v. Heinel Motors, 329 Pa. 360, 366 , 197 A. 920 ; Rau v. W-B & E. R. R. Co., 311 Pa. 510, 513 , *349 167 A. 230 .
Cited 15 timesPublished121 Pa. Super. 373 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 1935
The appellant cites Hart v. Central R. Co. of N. J. (N. J.), 147 A. 733 , and Rossi v. Penna. R. R. Co. (N. … Co. v. Turpin (Ind.), 145 N.
Cited 8 timesPublished138 Pa. Super. 577 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 1939
Com. v. Kelly, 134 Pa. Superior Ct. 241, 243 , ( 4 A. 2d 209 . … Com. v. Duca, 312 Pa. 101, 111 , 165 A. 825 ; Rudy v. Com., 128 Pa. 500, 508 , 18 A. 344 ; Com. v. Barrish, 297 Pa. 160, 170 , 146 A. 553 ; Com. v. Jordan, 328 Pa. 439, 446, 447 , 196 A. 10 .
Cited 4 timesPublished26 Pa. Super. 539 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 1904
The facts of this case are strikingly similar to those in the case of Jennings v. Union Traction Co., 206 Pa. 31 . … In signaling the conductor to stop, the plaintiff arose from her seat, which was on the edge of the car next the running board.
Cited 1 timesPublishedFeld & Sons, Inc. v. Pechner, Dorfman, Wolfee, Rounick, & Cabot
312 Pa. Super. 125 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1983
Sinn v. Burd, 486 Pa. 146 , 404 A.2d 672 (1979); Gekas v. Shapp, 469 Pa. 1 , 364 A.2d 691 (1976); DeSantis v. … Appellants’ self-pity is almost as reprehensible as their conduct before the National Labor Relations Board.
Cited 35 timesPublished157 Pa. Super. 401 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1945
The referee, the board, and the court below were of one mind that he was an employee of defendant. … We agree with the board’s finding “that claimant was injured in the regular course of defendant’s business.”
Cited 17 timesPublishedPennsylvania Power & Light Co. v. Maritime Management, Inc.
693 A.2d 592 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1997
See Maritime Management, Inc. v. Liquor Control Board, 153 Pa. Commw. 375 , 621 A2d 1097 (1993). … Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Court House Motor Inn, 13 Pa. Commw. 164, 168 , 318 A.2d 383, 385 (1974).
Cited 10 timesPublishedChevra Achewa Chesed Anshe Cheval v. Philadelphia
116 Pa. Super. 101 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 1, 1935
Co. v. Stowe Twp., supra; Barnes Foundation v. Keely, supra; Dougherty v. Phila., 314 Pa. 298, 301 . … See Methodist Episcopal Church Board v. Phila., 266 Pa. 405 , 109 A. 664 ; Laymen’s Week-End Retreat v. Butler, 83 Pa. Superior Ct. 1 ; Barnes Foundation v. Keely, 314 Pa. 112 , 171 A. 267 .
Cited 8 timesPublished285 Pa. Super. 237 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1981
United States, 418 U.S. 87 , 94 S.Ct. 2887 , 41 L.Ed.2d 590 (1974); Bradley v. School Board of Richmond, 416 U.S. 696, 711 , 94 S.Ct. 2006, 2016 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974); Thorpe v. … In Bradley v. School Board of Richmond, supra, Mr.
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna