Case law

Beso v. Eastern Building & Loan Ass'n of Syracuse

16 Pa. Super. 222 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 14, 1901

The management of all the business of the association shall be vested in a board of nine directors, who shall be chosen at each regular meeting; said board shall have full power and authority to fill all vacancies and make … Stewart, 41 Pa. 54 ; Caley v. Phila. & Chester Railroad Company, 80 Pa. 363 . The decree of the court below is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed at costs of appellant.

Kozemchak v. Garner

163 Pa. Super. 328 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1948

Anderson v. Perta, 138 Pa. Superior Ct. 321 , 10 A. 2d 898 ; Mulheirn v. Brown, 322 Pa. 171 , 185 A. 304 . … Anderson v. Perta, supra; Mulheirn v. Brown, supra; Stubbs v. Edwards, 260 Pa. 75, 78 , 103 A. 511 ; Bloom v. Bailey, 292 Pa. 348, 350 , 141 A. 150 ; Collichio v. Williams, 311 Pa. 553 , 166 A. 857 .

Commonwealth ex rel. Fairman v. Cavell

207 Pa. Super. 163 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 1965

Brown v. Bahl, 111 Pa. Superior Ct. 598, 602, 170 A. 346, 348 (1934). In the instant case, however, it is clear that the judge relied heavily on his own recollection of the facts. This was clearly error. … Brown v. Bahl, supra, at 602. Otherwise, the appellant would be denied his right to cross-examine, test and dispute the trial judge’s recollection, and we, on appeal, would not be furnished with a. dependable record.

Williams v. Temple University Hospital

174 Pa. Super. 47 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 1953

The Board’s findings of fact were: “2. … Darmopray v. Budd Manufacturing Co., supra.

Bowser v. Milliron Construction Co.

93 Pa. Super. 34 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 1927

properly applied: Kuca v. … Where there is competent evidence to support it the finding of the Board is as conclusive on appeal as the verdict of a jury: Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co., 286 Pa. 199 .

Com. v. Bush, B.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 9, 2026

Joseph v. Glunt, 96 A.3d 365, 368 (Pa. Super. 2014), citing Brown v. Pa. Dep’t. of Corr., 81 A.3d 814, 815 (Pa. 2013). See also Warren v. DOC, 616 A.2d 140, 142 (Pa. … See Travis v. Giroux, 83 A.3d 525 (Pa.

Commonwealth v. Rolinski

267 Pa. Super. 199 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 1979

Commonwealth v. Ackerman, 239 Pa.Super. 187 , 361 A.2d 746 (1976); Commonwealth v. Brown, 229 Pa.Super. 67 , 323 A.2d 845 (1974). … Commonwealth v. Ackerman, 289 Pa.Super. 187 , 361 A.2d 746 (1976).

Commonwealth v. Burns

198 Pa. Super. 208 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 12, 1962

“In the case of Springer v. State, 196 N.E. 97 , the Supreme Court of Indiana sustained the conviction of the Superintendent of the County Hospital on a charge of embezzling money paid by the patients for board. … See People v. Connolly, supra; O’Shea v. United States, supra. In Williams v.

Urbaczewski v. Urbaczewski

158 Pa. Super. 614 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1945

Van Dyke v. Van Dyke, 135 Pa. 459 , 19 A. 1061 ; Lomax *616 v. Lomax, 87 Pa. Superior Ct. 543 ; Headland v. Headland, 88 Pa. Superior Ct. 417 . … Rosa v. Rosa, 95 Pa. Superior Ct. 415 ; Bates v. Bates, 153 Pa. Superior Ct. 133 , 33 A. 2d 281 .

Anderson v. Schroeder Monumental Works

159 Pa. Super. 620 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1946

Stauffer v. Hubley Manufacturing Co., 151 Pa. Superior Ct. 322 , 30 A. 2d 370 . In Treaster v. North American Refractories Company et al., 156 Pa. … The evidence here shows, as it did in Roschak et ux. v. Vulcan Iron Works, 157 Pa.

Barkanich v. Jeddo-Highland Coal Co.

105 Pa. Super. 145 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 1932

This action was sustained by tbe board and tbe court below, and this appeal by defendant followed. … The court below sustained tbe award upon tbe authority of Dickey v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R. R. Co., 297 Pa. 172 , and Walker v. Quemahoning Coal Co., 99 Pa. Superior Ct. 252 .

Kilgore v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

127 Pa. Super. 213 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1937

The appellant admits that in such case the basic action of the board, as approved by the court below, is in accord with the decisions of the Supreme Court and this court. See Gairt v. … Curry Coal Mining Co., supra; Hudyck v. Wyoming Shovel Works, 299 Pa. 182 , 149 A. 312 ; Chase v. Emery Mfg. Co., 271 Pa. 265 , 113 A. 840 ; Hughes v. American Int.

Potter v. Scranton Railway Co.

19 Pa. Super. 444 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 14, 1902

Co., 150 Pa. 180 ; in which this doctrine was first announced and which has been followed by numerous cases,: Wheelahan v. Traction Co., 150 Pa. 187 ; Brown v. Traction Co., 14 Pa., Superior Ct. 594; Trout v. … Hamilton v.

Moore v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

136 Pa. Super. 182 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 8, 1939

In the case of Wilson v. Reading Co., 95 Pa. … J., in the case of Chase v. City of Erie, 102 Pa.

McGarvey v. Butler Consolidated Coal Co.

157 Pa. Super. 353 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 1945

Metz v. Quakertown Stove Works, 156 Pa. Superior Ct. 70 , 39 A. 2d 534 . … Jones v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co., 154 Pa. Superior Ct. 513 , 36 A. 2d 172 ; Plaugher v. American Viscose Corp., 151 Pa. Superior Ct. 401 , 30 A. 2d 376 .

Bronson v. Domovich

427 Pa. Super. 312 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 30, 1993

D) It is also respondents’ “Policy” pursuant to a consent decree, TCU v. Shapp,’ to return segregated inmates to general population when their behavior has been shown to be modified. … According to Appellant, the review board did not punish him with solitary confinement pursuant to established criteria and policy; hence, because the board violated his due process *316 rights in imposing the punishment,

CROSBY BY CROSBY v. Sultz

405 Pa. Super. 527 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 19, 1991

See also Zimmerman v. … See Zanine v.

Bell SEC. of Banking v. Anderson

143 Pa. Super. 56 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 9, 1940

These facts are wholly different from those in the case of Scott v. Brown, 240 Pa. 328 , 87 A. 431 . … See also DeCoster v. Brown, 129 Pa. Superior Ct. 283, 284-5 , 195 A. 636 , *67 for a recital of sufficient facts respecting notice of dishonor to make out a case against an indorser. In Zollner v.

Stauffer v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.

116 Pa. Super. 277 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1934

On appeal, the court of common pleas remitted the case to the board for further hearing. … The burden was on the claimant to prove her case by a preponderance of the evidence: Condron v. P. & R. C. & I. Co., 78 Pa. Superior Ct. 133 ; Keyes v. N. Y. O. & W. R. R., 265 Pa. 105 , 108 A. 406 .

Manack v. Sandlin

2002 Pa. Super. 328 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 2002

Jamison v. … See DeCoatsworth v.