Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspasuperct

10,000+ results

2.13s

  • Zedalis Et Ux. v. Jeddo-Highl'd C. Co.

    113 Pa. Super. 49 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 1934

    The ruling is in accord with our decisions in Franey v. Glen Alden Coal Co., 105 Pa. Superior Ct. 448 , 161 A. 433 ; Holsapfel v. Great Lakes Stages, 105 Pa. Su *52 perior Ct. 410, 161 A. 449 ; Faucett v. Phila. R. T. … Superior Ct. 449 ; Conroy v. Loew’s Inc., 102 Pa. Superior Ct. 523 , 157 A. 495 ; Dunbar v. Jacobson, 106 Pa. Superior Ct. 95 , 161 A. 431 ; ;as well as those of the Supreme Court. See Todd v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Cridland v. Stevens

    9 Pa. Super. 41 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 1898

    Brown for $3,000 was afterwards accepted by the defendant, in lieu of the mortgage. … The effect of this receipt, under the circumstances, was also for the jury: Shepherd v. Busch, 154 Pa. 149 . The specifications of error relate mainly to matters of fact which were properly submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Patton v. Worthington Associates, Inc.

    2012 Pa. Super. 74 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 2012

    In Peck, a corrections officer employed by Wackenhut Corrections Corporation brought a negligence action against the Board of Prison Inspectors (the Board). … The Prison Board is [ ] not a statutory employer here because Peck’s employer, Wackenhut, is an independent contractor. Simonton v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Mallory v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.

    162 Pa. Super. 541 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1948

    Upon appeal both the Board and the Court of Common Pleas affirmed the award. … accident, it was proper for.the board to make an award based upon the increase of disability:’. . .”

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Shank v. Consolidation Coal Co.

    161 Pa. Super. 304 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1947

    Upon that point the referee and the board found against the employer, and awarded compensation which included the disputed bills. The court below reversed the board, and the case is here upon the claimant’s appeal. … Kessler v. N. Side Pack. Co., 122 Pa. Superior Ct. 565 , 186 A. 404 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Com. v. Abdul-Ali, N.

    2025 Pa. Super. 216 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 2025

    Brown] confronted the intruders at his bedroom door. [Mr.] Brown yelled at his wife to climb out through the window … onto the roof, which she did. … Brown, 925 A.2d 147, 157 (Pa. 2007) (noting this Court’s approval of the redaction practices permitted under Richardson). Commonwealth v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rydal-Meadowbrook Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

    173 Pa. Super. 380 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 1953

    Arsenal Board of Trade v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 166 Pa. Superior Ct. 548, 552 , 72 A. 2d 612 ; Commuters’ Committee v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 170 Pa. … As an appellant the Association is *384 in a position comparable to that of tbe Arsenal Board of Trade in the case above cited.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Rose

    2003 Pa. Super. 60 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 14, 2003

    Commonwealth v. Cassidy, 447 Pa.Super. 192 , 668 A.2d 1143, 1144 (Pa.Super.1995) (citations omitted). Commonwealth v. … See Fields v. State, 731 So.2d 753, 754 (Fla.Ct.App.1999), review denied, 761 So.2d 328 (Fla.1999). In Brown v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Curran v. James Regulator Co.

    157 Pa. Super. 44 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1944

    Defendant relies upon Toohey v. Carnegie Coal Corp., 150 Pa. Superior Ct. 297 , 28 A. 2d 362 , and Powell v. Hills Garage et al., 150 Pa. Superior Ct. 17 , 27 A. 2d 773 . In the Toohey case, supra, and in Apker v. … L. 1552 (since under the decision in Rich Hill Coal Co. et al. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Carradorini Appeal

    189 Pa. Super. 624 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 3, 1959

    Electric Co. v. … At page 432 it is stated: “An acceptance must be shown by some definite authoritative act of the municipality (Grant v. Dickson City Borough, 235 Pa. 536 ; Steel v. Huntingdon Borough, 191 Pa. 627, 629, 630 ; Wahl v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lattanze v. Silverstrini

    287 Pa. Super. 263 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1981

    See Pennstan Supply, Inc. v. Hay, 283 Pa.Super. 558 , 424 A.2d 950 (1981); Brogley v. Chambersburg Engineering et al., 283 Pa.Super. 562 , 424 A.2d 952 (1981). And see Slagter v. … Brown, J., Mason Avrigian, J., and Frederick B. Smillie, J., and upon consideration of briefs filed, plaintiffs Motion for New Trial is refused.”

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Jackson

    263 Pa. Super. 183 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 7, 1979

    The warrant was run off on a copy machine, a copy of the warrant was put on a bulletin board, accompanied by two pictures of the individuals, names on the warrant were placed on the bulletin board at the station.” … Commonwealth v. Story, 476 Pa. 391 , 383 A.2d 155 (1978). As we stated in Commonwealth v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Madara v. Commissioners of Northumberland Co.

    87 Pa. Super. 440 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 27, 1925

    this day filed in the case of Lehman v. … The judgment of the court below and the award of the Compensation Board are reversed, and judgment is here entered for the defendant.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hodgdon v. Kerr Salt Co.

    176 Pa. Super. 177 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 1954

    Menarde v. Phila. Transportation Co., 376 Pa. 497, 501, 502 , 103 *181 A. 2d 681; Frick v. Pittsburgh School District, supra. … Boyle v. Boyle, 174 Pa. Superior Ct. 188 , 100 A. 2d 385 ; Malik v. Uniontown, 172 Pa. Superior Ct. 562 , 94 A. 2d 151 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bonds v. Ohio River Co.

    220 Pa. Super. 9 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 1971

    See Clift v. Philadelphia, 41 Pa. Superior Ct. 638 (1910). In Mutual Loan and Savings Assn. of Chambersburg v. … In National Corporation v. Brown, 186 Pa. Superior Ct. 46 , 140 A. 2d 469 (1958), the right to a new trial where transcript of the charge was missing was recognized by implication.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Asper v. Haffley

    312 Pa. Super. 424 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1983

    In Commonwealth Industrial Board v. United States Steel Corp., 22 Pa. … Secondly, the court found that the decision of the Commonwealth Court in Baptist Children’s House v. Commonwealth of Pa. Industrial Board of Dept. of Labor and Industry, 51 Pa.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. GHAUL

    205 Pa. Super. 80 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1965

    Commonwealth v. Murray, 202 Pa. Superior Ct. 272 , 195 A. 2d 183 . … The cases cited in appellants’ brief are not controlling: Commonwealth v. Cyans, 88 Pa. Superior Ct. 227 ; Commonwealth v. Koss, 136 Pa. Superior Ct. 173 , 7 A. 2d 20 ; Commonwealth v. Tachoir, 166 Pa.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Mitchell v. Moore

    1999 Pa. Super. 77 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1999

    Brown v. McCurdy, 278 Pa. 19, 22, 122 A. 169, 170 (1928). … See Meehan v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Kottcamp v. York County

    28 Pa. Super. 96 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1905

    The foregoing ruling was in accordance with a long line of reported decisions of the courts of common pleas of the state, beginning with Coleman v. Hess, 1 Browne’s Reps. 274, decided in 1811. … . & R. 505; Lyon v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Liberty Fireman's Social Club Liquor License Case

    168 Pa. Super. 500 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1951

    On the ground that the quota for the Borough of North York was filled, the appellant was refused a license by the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board. The court below sustained the board and this appeal followed. … See also Peters v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.