Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.77s
170 Pa. Super. 245 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 1952
This Court upheld the conviction and affirmed the judgment of sentence (Com. v. Coroniti, 155 Pa. … The Federal Bureau of Investigation is merely one of the many offices, divisions, bureaus and boards which go to make up the Department of Justice.
Cited 11 timesPublished282 Pa. Super. 51 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1980
Commonwealth v. Brown, 464 Pa. 625 , 347 A.2d 716 (1975); Commonwealth v. Johnson, 452 Pa. 130 , 305 A.2d 5 (1973); Commonwealth v. Biebighauser, 450 Pa. 336 , 300 A.2d 70 (1973). … See, e. g., Commonwealth v. Christian, 480 Pa. 131 , 389 A.2d 545 , 94 A.L.R.3d 1 (1978); Commonwealth v. Brown, supra; Commonwealth v. Foster, 221 Pa.Super. 426 , 293 A.2d 94 (1972).
Cited 11 timesPublishedLutz v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund
124 Pa. Super. 149 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 27, 1936
Pee Cubiam, This case is ruled by our decision in Bock v. D. B. Frampton & Co., 105 Pa. Superior Ct. 380 , 161 A. 762 . … We cannot agree with the conclusion of the compensation board that the term ‘Pennsylvania employes’, as used in the act, refers to every employee who is working for a Pennsylvania employer.
Cited 9 timesPublishedBlackwell v. Dahlstrom Metallic Door Co.
111 Pa. Super. 93 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 30, 1933
The board sustained his conclusion and the court affirmed the board. The appellants’ sole contention is that there was not sufficient competent evidence to show a causal connection between the injury and the disability. … This medical testimony, under the rulings of Fink v. Sheldon Axle & Spring Co., 270 Pa. 476 , 113 A. 666 ; McCrosson v. P. R. T.
Cited 7 timesPublished342 Pa. Super. 480 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 1985
Gordon was a pharmacist licensed by the State Board of Pharmacy. … An element of both offenses is that the defendant not be registered under the Act (the CSDDCA) nor be licensed or registered by the appropriate State Board. Commonwealth v.
Reversed by Commonwealth v. Gordon, 511 Pa. 481 (1986)Cited 2 timesPublishedRovere v. Interstate Cemetery Co.
164 Pa. Super. 233 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 1948
Opinion by Hirt, J., In this workmen’s compensation case both the referee and the board refused an award. … The board here so found upon admitted facts. Judgment affirmed.
Cited 18 timesPublishedKempa v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.
133 Pa. Super. 392 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1938
Superior Ct. 349, 351 ; Mohr v. Desimone & Sayers, 110 Pa. Superior Ct. 44, 49 , 167 A. 504 ; Witt v. Witt’s Food Market et al., 122 Pa. Superior Ct. 557, 564 , 186 A. 275 . In McLaughlin v. … See, also, Broad Street Trust Co. v. Heyl Bros. et al., 128 Pa. Superior Ct. 65, 69 , 193 A. 397 .
Cited 1 timesPublished87 Pa. Super. 398 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 1925
Chief Justice Mosehzisker, in delivering an opinion in the case of Trust Company v. … The conclusion of the court is further supported by First National Bank v. Colonial Hotel Co., 226 Pa. 292 ; De Forest v. Northwest Townsite Co. 236 Pa. 125 , 241 Pa. 78 . Judgment affirmed.
Cited 3 timesPublished155 Pa. Super. 215 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1944
On appeal to the common pleas, the court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the action of the board, and entered judgment against Travelers Insurance Company, insurance carrier, alone. See Span v. … Cease v. Carter Bache and Alfred B. Cease v. Amelia Thomas, Executrix of James E.
Cited 6 timesPublished108 Pa. Super. 520 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 1933
In Green v. Hiestand, 103 Pa. … Lees, 273 Pa. 85 , 116 Atl. 679 ; Heck v. United Presbyterian Church, 86 Pa. Superior Ct. 77 ; Poffinberger v. Martin, 83 Pa. Superior Ct. 524 and kindred cases.
Cited 7 timesPublished166 Pa. Super. 186 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 1949
In Pinsky v. … See Slotnick v. Lavinc, 160 Pa. Superior Ct. 186 , 50 A. 2d 544 ; Brown & Bigelow, Inc., v. Borish, 165 Pa. Superior Ct. 308 , 67 A. 2d 823 . Order affirmed.
Cited 11 timesPublishedStevenson v. Westmoreland Coal Co.
146 Pa. Super. 32 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1941
Michetti v. State *36 Wkm’s Ins. Fund, 143 Pa. Superior Ct. 458 , 17 A. 2d 712 . Claimant by means of an appeal to the board could have had the extent of his disability determined, followed by an appropriate award. … Lomancik v. Y. and O. Coal Co., 119 Pa. Superior Ct. 263 , 180 A. 731 ; Pete v. MacDonald Eng. Co., 117 Pa. Superior Ct. 605 , 178 A. 530 .
Cited 9 timesPublishedGerst Et Ux. v. Smith-Faris Co.
107 Pa. Super. 30 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 27, 1932
As to the findings of fact by the referee and workmen’s compensation board, the only question for the court is: Does the record contain legally competent evidence to sustain them? Ford v. Dick, 288 Pa. 140 . … to be drawn therefrom: Sgattone v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedCollins, D. v. Philadelphia Suburban Development
179 A.3d 69 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 2018
Additionally, the board of arbitrators awarded Mrs. Cannon-Collins $50,000 for her loss of consortium claim. … -4- J-A31035-17 Appellants based on the board of arbitrators’ award.
Cited 43 timesPublished7 Pa. Super. 206 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1898
The plaintiff was a brother-in-law of the decedent, against whose estate he brought his action to recover boarding, lodging, etc., for six years prior to his death. … In all cases, except that of parent and child, there must be evidence beyond the relationship that the creation of no debt was intended: ” Curry v. Curry, 114 Pa. 367 .
Cited 2 timesPublished144 Pa. Super. 347 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 4, 1941
on January 20, 1939; the board affirmed the award on November 30, 1939, appeal was taken by defendant to *351 the court of common pleas on December 20, 1939. … See also along similar lines, Thompson v. Consolidated Gas Co., 300 U. S. *353 55, 80, 81; Euclid v. Ambler Co., 272 U. S. 365, 395 ; Taylor v. Moore, 303 Pa. 469, 472 , 154 A. 799 . It is so ordered.
Cited 5 timesPublished29 Pa. Super. 172 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1905
Brown, and. at a later date assigned to him their right of action growing out of the entry by the defendant. … Superior Ct. 148 ; Standard Plate Glass Co. v. Butler Water Co., 5 Pa. Superior Ct. 563 ; Thompson v. Traction Co. 181 Pa. 131 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedBeamer v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.
50 Pa. Super. 211 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 1, 1912
As though the board broke under me.” … He also stated *218 that the board next to it was rotten.
Cited 1 timesPublished166 Pa. Super. 532 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 11, 1950
The corporation and the board, dominated by Michael, by the specious device of employing Mrs. … Ladner v. Siegel, 298 Pa. 487 , 148 A. 699 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedFreda v. Lake Ariel Park & Amusement Co.
154 Pa. Super. 625 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 1944
: Chambers v. … In Graham v. Reynoldsville Borough, 132 Pa.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna