Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.07s
178 Pa. Super. 75 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1955
Flood and James Lenahan Brown are attorneys who represented three taxpayers in an appeal from the Auditor’s Report of the Borough of Exeter for the year 1946. … However, in the leading case of Hempstead v. Meadville Theological School, 286 Pa. 493 , 134 A. 103 , Mr.
Cited 10 timesPublished33 Pa. Super. 108 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 25, 1907
It ceased to exist as a street and no further action was necessary to effect the restoration of the vacated portion to the abutting landowners : Wetherill v. R. R. Co., 195 Pa. 156 ; Carpenter v. R. R. … None of the acts recited in the petition could postpone the vacation which had been effectually accomplished by the action of the board of surveyors on June 8, 1895: Stull’s Appeal, 11 W. N. C. 350; Alcorn v.
Cited 3 timesPublished438 Pa. Super. 499 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 1995
Following the denial of post-verdict motions, Stepp was sentenced by the Honorable Carson V. Brown. … In Commonwealth v.
Cited 9 timesPublished226 Pa. Super. 445 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 1973
See Commonwealth v. Brown, 444 Pa. 318 , 282 A. 2d 364 (1971). Appellant’s statement indicated an interest in both the Avoman’s money and her body. … Viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, Commonwealth v. Johnston, 438 Pa. 485 , 263 A. 2d 376 (1970), it is clear that the evidence in this case supports a conviction for both of the charges.
Cited 1 timesPublishedHartman v. Standard Steel Works Co.
159 Pa. Super. 122 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1946
The Workmen’s Compensation Board affirmed the referee’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order of disallowance. The court below affirmed' the board and dismissed claimant’s appeal. … The Workmen’s Compensation Board attempted to distinguish its disallowance of compensation in this case from its award of compensation in Bingaman v. Baldwin Locomotive Works, Inc., 159 Pa.
Cited 1 timesPublished437 Pa. Super. 334 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1995
Knorr, 527 Pa. 83, 86-87, 588 A.2d 503, 505 (1991), where our Supreme Court stated: Parties to a divorce action may bargain between themselves and structure their agreement as best serves their interests, Brown v. … Millstein, 311 Pa.Super. 495 , 457 A.2d 1291 (1983) (an agreement for child support may not be reduced by the court, although an Order to increase support is *342 permissible when circumstances warrant) and Brown v.
Cited 7 timesPublished189 Pa. Super. 624 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 3, 1959
Electric Co. v. … At page 432 it is stated: “An acceptance must be shown by some definite authoritative act of the municipality (Grant v. Dickson City Borough, 235 Pa. 536 ; Steel v. Huntingdon Borough, 191 Pa. 627, 629, 630 ; Wahl v.
Cited 3 timesPublished144 Pa. Super. 385 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 1941
The referee who heard the case awarded compensation and subsequently the board affirmed the referee. … S. 2748” appeared on V.. Roger ¿Myers’ truck. Exceptions were filed by the appellants to the board’s findings and these exceptions were dismissed by Krei-sher, P. J. This appeal followed.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDower Unemployment Compensation Case
179 Pa. Super. 201 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 1955
Opinion by Ervin, J., This is an appeal from the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review denying benefits on the ground that claimant was disqualified to receive unemployment compensation benefits for the … Barclay White Company v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, supra, 356 Pa. 43 , 50 A. 2d 336 .
Cited 5 timesPublished2011 Pa. Super. 24 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 3, 2011
Commonwealth v. Polo, 563 Pa. 218, 224 , 759 A.2d 372, 375 (2000). … Commonwealth v. Beattie, 411 Pa.Super. 177 , 601 A.2d 297, 301 (1991).
Cited 18 timesPublished44 Pa. Super. 552 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 1910
The question raised by this specification of error has been considered by this court in Commonwealth v. Shaleen, 30 Pa. Superior Ct. 1 ; by the Supreme Court of this state in Commonwealth v. … him to testify as to the differences between the certificate in question and the signatures thereto and the genuine certificates issued by the board.
Cited 5 timesPublished244 Pa. Super. 154 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1976
During their inventory the police found a brown paper bag under the front seat and, upon opening the bag, discovered a plastic bag of suspected marijuana. 2 Relying on our Supreme Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. … The brown paper bag may have been in plain view, but not the marijuana. The contraband was not in plain view.” .
Cited 29 timesPublishedVersellesi v. Elizabeth Township
136 Pa. Super. 362 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1939
See Sonnett v. Stowe Township, 100 Pa. Superior Ct. 397 . In Sames v. Borough of Perkasie et al., 100 Pa. … In Barclay-Westmoreland Trust Co. v. Borough of Latrobe, 131 Pa.
Cited 2 timesPublished165 Pa. Super. 229 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1949
The referee and the board both concluded that deceased was an employe and an award of compensation was made in favor of Hazel Felten, deceased’s widow. … The court below affirmed the findings of the board and entered judgment on the award.
Cited 10 timesPublished176 Pa. Super. 27 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 1954
.” *30 It is clear that the indictment in this case meets the standards required in this Commonwealth as set forth, inter alia, in Com. v. Wooden, 94 Pa. Superior Ct. 452 , and Com. v. … Haywood, as such members of and composing the said board of commissioners of public grounds and buildings, as aforesaid, and the said John C.
Cited 4 timesPublished2004 Pa. Super. 244 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 2004
Cox v. Commonwealth Board of Probation and Parole, 507 Pa. 614 , 493 A.2d 680 (1985). Initially, the parole board found that the time in Eagleville was “time at liberty on parole” rather than being in custody. … Stallsmith v.
Cited 6 timesPublished312 Pa. Super. 357 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 8, 1983
Commonwealth v. Rodriguez, 296 Pa.Superior Ct. 349, 351, 442 A.2d 803, 804 (1982). See also Commonwealth v. Roscioli, 454 Pa. 59, 62 , 309 A.2d 396, 398 (1973); and Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Chamberlain, 277 Pa.Superior Ct. 503, 419 A.2d 1261 (1980) (nine pounds of marijuana); Commonwealth v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDiCampli v. General Electric Co.
193 Pa. Super. 427 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1960
See also Kovatch v. … The case of Williams v. John B. Kelly Co., 128 Pa. Superior Ct. 228 , 193 A. 97 , relied upon by the Board and the court below is not controlling.
Cited 7 timesPublished281 Pa. Super. 541 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 1980
pounds they receive for cash which is then turned back over to Brown. … The cash is then split between Brown and Richard and Michael Luddy.
Cited 39 timesPublished439 Pa. Super. 216 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 10, 1995
Commonwealth v. Carter, 403 Pa.Super. 615, 617-18 , 589 A.2d 1133, 1134 (1991), citing Commonwealth v. Seese, 512 Pa. 439 , 517 A.2d 920 (1986); Commonwealth v. Brown, 408 Pa.Super. 246, 249 , 596 A.2d 840 (1991). … See, Commonwealth v. Campbell, 418 Pa.Super. 391 , 614 A.2d 692 (1992); Commonwealth v. Brown, 408 Pa.Super. 246, 252 , 596 A.2d 840 (1991); Commonwealth v. Robinson, 399 Pa.Super. 199 , 582 A.2d 14 (1990).
Cited 16 timesPublished
Ask Donna